I have spoken to many football fans about Fifa Ranking. I personally tend to think that it is important. I have looked at the details of how they rank teams across the world. I feel that ranking is important in terms of drawing groups for competitions like Euro, World Cup and other importnat competitions. If we never had rankings and randomely chose teams to be put into groups, we would have scenarios like Brazil, Argentina, Italy, Germany in the same group. Of course, there are many other scenarios where 4 excellent football nations would be put into the same group and it would not be fair. Well, having said that, many football fans say that the Coca Cola ranking is not a good way of ranking teams around the world. Let me propose a question to all of you football fans, knowing that ranking is neccessary for group drawings and fixtures, is there a better way of ranking teams as an alternative to the Coca Cola rankings? Obviously there is a debate, because as I look at the rankings, I feel that some teams ranked 50-60 can beat a team that's ranked in the 30s. I don't want to mention any specifics to avoid harsh arguments (as it always happens). But you know what I mean. There is no right or wrong answer, please express your football passion and share your experience, and let's have an educated discussion about a better ranking system if you feel it is neccessary.