I fought Matt Law and Matt Law won. Transfer Thread

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by Kerry Dixon's Boots, Jun 9, 2020.

  1. lobomojo

    lobomojo Member+

    Chelsea, Gillingham
    Jul 17, 2004
    Freedom
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    George to Fulham for 24 million "pure profit" permanently. I hate clownlake.

    NJ has rechecked out his "Learn German in Ten Days" book with the loan deal obligation to be made permanent. I hate clownlake. And can see why NJ does at this point, though likely more driven by an Agent who wants a payday,, but if he won't come back ******** him ohh and I repeat ******** clownlake.

    I think the lack of an experienced strong, physical hold up capable striker on the team will really hurt us this year against the many bus parkers we will face. We are awful short and slender up front. Cue "Short People" by Randy Newman. We are a very expensive old days Sunderland/Burnley living off corners so far. Hopefully Guiu steps up huge, Enzo considers a 2nd way, and we stay lucky with var and results.

    Also in a better mood than it sounds this Holiday.:D
     
  2. StamfordBridgeLions

    Chelsea FC
    Sep 4, 2016
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nico to Munich
    • €16.5m loan fee
    • €65m obligation to buy
    however to make the obligation to buy come true NJ will havee to play a lot of games and so my guess is that he will be returned to us next summer.
     
  3. JimWharton

    JimWharton Member+

    Feb 25, 2017
    It does all seem pretty curious. George seemed like a talent, why let him go? Jackson is certainly a better option than Guiu but we already pissed him all the way off. Lots of wingers, tho.
     
    lobomojo repped this.
  4. lobomojo

    lobomojo Member+

    Chelsea, Gillingham
    Jul 17, 2004
    Freedom
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    The George deal was not completed in time in the end so still ours, a good thing I think.

    Sterling still ours also, a very expensive water-boy at 300k/week. Refuses to go to Turkey or to the Saudi League. The new Bogarde?
     
    JimWharton repped this.
  5. Crawleybus

    Crawleybus Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    I think so, thought perhaps Saudi might have interested him though I guess it depends on how long is left on his contract, is it his last season under contract? Perhaps he's hoping to pick up a Premier League club on a free next season.
     
  6. lobomojo

    lobomojo Member+

    Chelsea, Gillingham
    Jul 17, 2004
    Freedom
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    According to NY Times still 2 years left at 300k a week (30 million + in wages left):sick:
     
    StamfordBridgeLions repped this.
  7. StamfordBridgeLions

    Chelsea FC
    Sep 4, 2016
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    325k a week until 2027. He has no desire to leave London. He is totally based in London with his family and doesn't want to go anywhere else.

    Charlton, Millwall or maybe he will return to QPR?

    I thought Brentford might have been an option for him or West Ham?

    But yep, he is the new Winston Bogarde.
     
    lobomojo repped this.
  8. StamfordBridgeLions

    Chelsea FC
    Sep 4, 2016
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    We have four left wingers Neto, George, Gittens, and Garnacho.
    Actually 6 on the books if you also include Sterling and Mudryk LOL

    I get that with 5 subs a manager can easily use 4 wingers in a game, but this is still a bit ridiculous.
     
  9. Dr_Intoxicated

    Dr_Intoxicated Member+

    Sep 10, 2002
    London
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    He is a family man wants to say in London
     
  10. lobomojo

    lobomojo Member+

    Chelsea, Gillingham
    Jul 17, 2004
    Freedom
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Seems clownlake really pissed off Jackson, according to Bayern exec Hoeneß, NJ and his agent paid over 3 million of the loan fee themselves, with Bayern in for 13.5 million. Hoeneß, further says 40 matches is the trigger point to make the deal obligatory and that Jackson "will never get 40 matches...", sounds like contractual bad faith from the go.
     
    StamfordBridgeLions repped this.
  11. Rman3349

    Rman3349 Member

    Chelsea
    United States
    Oct 31, 2006
    Boston
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Even worse than that I think. Maybe its the translation but I saw "40 games from the start" and read that to mean that the requirement is that he starts 40 games, not just 40 appearances. Which yeah, is not gonna happen
     
  12. StamfordBridgeLions

    Chelsea FC
    Sep 4, 2016
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    We will know by Christmas if he is coming back for certain. I mean he may only make 25 appearances but they still might like him.
     
  13. StamfordBridgeLions

    Chelsea FC
    Sep 4, 2016
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
     
  14. JimWharton

    JimWharton Member+

    Feb 25, 2017
    Conor to Spurs? Gross.
     
    StamfordBridgeLions repped this.
  15. lobomojo

    lobomojo Member+

    Chelsea, Gillingham
    Jul 17, 2004
    Freedom
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Gueh to Man City for 20 million but we are going to pay 65 million + for Jacquet

    " is considered an ideal choice to strengthen Chelsea's defense, given his technical abilities that align with the club's current transfer market strategy, as
    well as his capacity to make an immediate impact in matches from the very first moment."

    don't recall seeing him play so who knows but we seem to pay a lot for unproven players
     
  16. StamfordBridgeLions

    Chelsea FC
    Sep 4, 2016
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Personal terms agreed for JJ. Jeremy Jacquet [20]. 50 or 60 million Euros.

    I am sure he is a great young player. We have a bunch of young CBs and hopefully we will have the return of Levi Colwill at some point. What we needed imho was just one experienced CB to hold the team together. But our Directors of Sporting like them young.

    We are not entering the transfer market to make money buying and selling players - this is a real misconception of recent years.
     
  17. JimWharton

    JimWharton Member+

    Feb 25, 2017
    So we lost out on Jaquet to Liverpool and sent Disasi away on loan? Was Disasi worse than Badiashille?
     
  18. Dr_Intoxicated

    Dr_Intoxicated Member+

    Sep 10, 2002
    London
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    No he wasn't
     
    Cosmin10 repped this.
  19. Dr_Intoxicated

    Dr_Intoxicated Member+

    Sep 10, 2002
    London
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
    lobomojo repped this.
  20. Crawleybus

    Crawleybus Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Apparently he wanted to leave. I am surprised we didn't ask for a lot more though wasn't he on a long contract?! Ultimately however it means that as of right now we are a weaker side than the 'relegation form' team we ended with at the end of last season. We better start praying we find a left back at the level of Cucurella (We won't because I'm not sure there is one........certainly not one for sale anyway).

    We're f*cked.
     
    lobomojo repped this.
  21. Khan

    Khan Member+

    Mar 16, 2000
    On the road
    Meh, his kid has autism, and I'd imagine that Cucurella would want his boy to get the help he needs in a more native tongue to his family than English. He has to think of his child's future, and try to maximize his development as best he can, while thinking of his family's future after he retires.

    Your club should be commended for letting him go, because this is a scenario where family >>>> football. (Although, he should have gone to Barça.)
     
    yasik19 repped this.
  22. Crawleybus

    Crawleybus Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    And I'd imagine that we should have asked more for him........we're not a friggin charity.
     
  23. Crawleybus

    Crawleybus Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    Reports saying we're hoping to get Hall back from Newcastle...........I don't know his contract situation but I will be surprised if Newcastle let him go if they can help it. We gotta start praying we can make this happen.
     
  24. Khan

    Khan Member+

    Mar 16, 2000
    On the road
    Maybe? Or maybe madrid had a limit on what they'd spend on the position? Or maybe your club and the player had an agreement to let him go to Spain, because of his kid.

    Sometimes in life family >>>> football.
     

Share This Page