http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030321-023627-5923r About half way down : A group of American anti-war demonstrators who came to Iraq with Japanese human shield volunteers made it across the border today with 14 hours of uncensored video, all shot without Iraqi government minders present. Kenneth Joseph, a young American pastor with the Assyrian Church of the East, told UPI the trip "had shocked me back to reality." Some of the Iraqis he interviewed on camera "told me they would commit suicide if American bombing didn't start. They were willing to see their homes demolished to gain their freedom from Saddam's bloody tyranny. They convinced me that Saddam was a monster the likes of which the world had not seen since Stalin and Hitler. He and his sons are sick sadists. Their tales of slow torture and killing made me ill, such as people put in a huge shredder for plastic products, feet first so they could hear their screams as bodies got chewed up from foot to head." Hmmm. Reality sets in. Instead of supporting Saddam, he changes his mind.
Reading the initial post, I decided to activate my bulls*** detector and read the link. Did you notice who wrote it? And did you notice the hodgepodge nature of the article? Maybe I'm wrong, but it didn't ring true to me. At all. PS...is UPI Moonie-owned now?
Say, was Saddam doing bad stuff before or after the USA stopped supporting him and selling him biochemincal weapons? Just curious.
I won't speak for Dave, but de Borchgrave has been accused by former workers of allowing Moon to dictate editorial content. And Helen Thomas quit UPI the day after the Moonies bought it, after working there for 50 years. I think it'd be prudent to take anything run by UPI with a grain of salt. I don't know what Moon's motivation would be in this case, but the article did seem rather disjointed. Mind, I'm not claiming Saddam isn't a VeryBadMan. Just that UPI may not be the most trustworthy (editorial) source anymore.
I didn't realize UPI was still around. Remember, you can't spell "cheap" without AP and you can't spell "stupid" without UPI.
The vision I have is of an "editor-at-large" sitting in an office in New York or Washington, reading dispatches, and plopping them into an article, without checking. Doesn't the story strike everyone as awfully convenient? Let's get this straight...this person is committed enough to go to Iraq and become a human shield, but he's not committed enough to be aware that Saddam is an evil son of a bitch? And that same statement applies to the whole group?
Didn't you get the memo? If you oppose the war, you support Saddam. There's absolutely no middle ground. You can't both oppose the war and realize that Saddam is a VeryBadMan.
To be honest, neither was I. Dave sparked my curiosity, so off I went on another glorious GoogleQuest.
Regarding the horrific plastic shredder atrocity, I believe it: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3284-614607,00.html
It's really painful for you to admit Saddam is a horrible person who is bad for his country isn't it? Saddam would put superdave in the shredder feet first and superdave would be blaming Bush the entire way in.
I've noticed that some have suddenly developed an appetite for grains of salt. If the news doesn't agree with you, add salt.