How Kerry is failing the "foreign affairs" test.

Very misleading thread title. This story has nothing to do with John Kerry's foreign policy, and everything to do with Canadian beef.

Seems you might be suffering from a touch of mad cow yourself, Doyle.

 

Mad cows = Canadian WMDs? We'd better pre-emptively non-aggressively invade!

Let's see. Bush pisses off our allies and throws away all U.S. credibility in order to attack the wrong target and then utterly fecks up his little war through a series of miscalculations and you're giving him a free pass while moaning about Kerry irritating Canada over mad cow beef?

*sniff sniff*

I smell Bushie desperation.

 

Re: Mad cows = Canadian WMDs? We'd better pre-emptively non-aggressively invade!

Why do you hate america and want to see patriots turned into brain-decayed zombies just for going to July 4th BBQ's?

 

You "guys?" I'm the first one to respond (Dustin deleted his reply). And you send me negative reputation points because I "didn't read the thread properly?"



Canada DOES have lax testing standards for mad cow. It's obvious that you ate some yourself.

And your thread title still is misleading. The article has NOTHING to do with John Kerry passing a "foreign affairs" test. Hell, Canada is pretty much another US State anyway.

 

Doyle, how do you feel about Bush invading the wrong country?

 

Who's "we"? The spongiforms elect you their spokesman, or something?

 

Simple. The only reason any of us care about Kerry is because he wants Bush's job. If Kerry is to be given a "failing" grade by a partisan poster on BigSoccer, we need to understand how the grading curve is structured. If Kerry is "failing the foreign affairs test" based on his suggested trade policy regarding Canadian beef, then how do the other participants in the test rate? I'm very concerned, since the other prime contender for the presidency doesn't even know which country to invade after getting bombed.

If Kerry gets an "F" for Canadian beef trade policy, what does Bush get for not dealing with Saudi Arabia or Pakistan?

 

You're absolutely right, Roel. It's not like there are any other threads discussing Bush/BushCo./Bushies/Bush Junta/5-4 on the politics board.

 

If Iraq was the right country, why did he have to make up reasons to go after them? I agree with the Pakistan grade. Bush fails with Saudi Arabia. James Baker is a lobbyist paid for by the Saudi royal family, and he has an office in the White House. Bush clearly gets an "F" if the following warrants an "F."

From the article:

"The senators -- including Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry -- say Canada has lax testing standards for mad cow disease.

"The U.S. is reviewing public comments on a proposal to admit live Canadian cattle, banned since the discovery of mad cow disease in Alberta last May. "

By the way, I agree that Kerry will done an inadequate job at foreign policy, much like Clinton came up short. More like a "C". But neither are the spectacular failure that Bush is. That said, I think your grading isn't fair. We haven't seen anything yet that indicates failure from Kerry.

 

Re: Mad cows = Canadian WMDs? We'd better pre-emptively non-aggressively invade!

Because Cheney does not think that the American public can handle the truth.

If Canada actually tries this, we will be getting a new and very large 51st state.

 

This thread is hilarious.

Bush pisses away the greatest outpouring of global goodwill towards the United States since I don't know when, destroys U.S. credibility around the world, and utterly screws up his war and occupation. His untruths about WMDs are exposed and he's losing countries in his coalition of the shilling.

And yet Kerry is a "foreign affairs failure" because of some obscure mad cow tiff with Canada.

Attacking Minded, I salute you. You're a comedy genius.

 

So is you're latest kick to base your replies on which team a poster happens to list in their profile? Why do you continue to comment on AMERICAN politics when you live in Canada?