This is a long video, but it doesn't take long to recognize the clear indoctrination that Israelis have been fed. It's via reddit, so I don't know how to embed the video here. Video
Maybe hold off on this rhetoric, dude Ben-Gvir, a divisive figure in Israeli politics who wants Israel to annex the Palestinian territories, is promoting legislation that would see the death penalty handed down to terrorists. Hostage family members, holding pictures of their loved ones, vented their frustrations. One of them, Gil Dickmann, whose cousin is being held in Gaza, repeatedly shouted: “Bring them home!” “Maybe instead of talking about the dead, talk about the living. Stop talking about killing Arabs. Talk about saving Jews. This is your job!” shouted Hen Avigdori, whose wife and daughter were taken on October 7. Already frustrated at the apparent lack of progress to free the hostages, the family members accused Ben-Gvir of endangering their loved ones further by putting the issue of Palestinians held in Israeli prisons back in the spotlight. Family members worry that by suggesting that Israel might execute Palestinian prisoners, it could make Hamas less willing to release hostages or increase the likelihood of their mistreatment in Gaza. https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-hamas-war-gaza-news-11-20-23/index.html
Yeah, that seems sub-optimal, doesn't it. Of course, you could probably cherry pick the same sort of interviews in Gaza and the west bank as well.
Since it’s long, can you tell me if the part on killing babies and drinking their blood is worth the wait?
I think it only makes sense to accept that people like Netanyahu, despite saying they want peace, probably don't. They're not unhappy maintaining a sort of low level conflict if it means it provides an excuse for increasing amounts of land to be taken and controlled. Although, obviously, they never envisaged this latest atrocity occurring. TBH I don't think there's another plausible reason for the way they've been acting over the past few decades. It's the only thing that makes sense.
It's by Abby Martin who has, shall we say, her own 'interpretation' of things including the matter of being a 9/11 'truther' which was was against, then for, then against. That's the thing about people like that. If you don't like her opinion about something, give it a minute and another will be along. Y'know, a bit like buses. Put it this way. She's admired by Glen Greenwald Having said that the film mainly consists of ordinary Israelis stating their opinions which is not unreasonable in one way. The problem is in who chooses which ones are selected for showing. Like I say, you could make the same film in Gaza or the west bank, and probably easier.
in Bibi’s case the war might also be keeping him out of jail. Don’t know the details but I think he’s facing potential corruption charges.
Journalistic success https://wpde.com/news/nation-world/...alestine-gaza-hamas-terrorist-war-middle-east
Yemen’s Houthi rebels seize cargo ship in Red Sea and call Israeli vessels ‘legitimate targets’ Footage shows masked gunmen jumping on to Galaxy Leader, which Israel says is British-owned https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...seize-cargo-ship-galaxy-leader-red-sea-israel This seems to be a major escalation. If ships can't reach Israel via the Red Sea, it will add considerable costs as ships have to go around the whole of Africa and the Mediterranean Sea.
Oh yeah. I've seen a video from about 8 years ago of interviewing very regular young (male and females) and some older Palestinians in the West Bank their opinion about Hamas and most had mixed feelings (saying they did good on one hand but didn't like the violent part much) and a couple fully supported them. And I've seen some other celebratory and mocking videos (on both sides) that are really not worth mentioning but truly disappointing of human beings.
That was my one sentence snark response to what you’ve pointed out. Not a big fan of her nor that type of work. One more thing you and I were able to agree on Andy. I think I’ll have a dram of Laphroaig to that.
So what can Israel do? Yemen is about 2000 km away. Is the USA going to be involved? They're said to be consulting with allies, but I doubt European countries are eager to get involved in the Red Sea.
I did not watch the whole video, but if there's "indoctrination" -- wouldn't people all have the same opinions? Instead, every person had a different perspective, mostly anti-terrorist but a minority wishing the Arabs would disappear. (I'm assuming that the pro-peace responses didn't make it into the video.) We also don't know what questions were asked. If the questions themselves were of the "leading the witness" variety (for example: "what should be done about the daily attacks on Israel from Gaza?") the responses are understandably also slanted toward the "get rid of the terrorists" than if the question had been "what's the best way for Israel to achieve peace going forward?" Over and over again, the interviewees expressed a desire for a safe place to live, for both Israel and Palestine. Many sympathized with the Palestinians. I did not hear anyone espousing genocide, though that's the title of the video
Surely the IDF has been sending spy planes over Gaza regularly for decades. They've had all the opportunity and technological ability to do so. That they've razed much of Gaza to rubble in the last 6 weeks should make no difference to what they ALMOST CERTAINLY KNEW beforehand.
I don't think the IDF should be particularly subject to skepticism. The average observer should be very skeptical of what any military puts forth publically. But the IDF has a long history of observable bullshit reasoning that later on is very clearly determined to be lies. They aren't alone by any means, yet that doesn't negate what they are doing now.
I'm saying there may be limits to what aerial surveillance can achieve in a modern, dense urban environment. The rubble likely complicates a situation the technology is not well-suited for. I could be wrong and ground-penetrating radar is the bee's knees for distinguishing land use changes that are separated by very small intervals of time, but I sort of doubt it's that great in such situations. It's really annoying when people think that because a technology exists, all possible applications of said technology are a simple and perfectly efficacious method of discovering whatever it is one thinks should be discoverable.
You have to remember that a lot of the people here get their "expertise" from watching Hollywood Movies or playing Call of Duty. They'll never have the experience of being exposed to such equipment personally, let alone being able to use it.
I wouldn't be surprised if IDF had completely fallen asleep at the wheel not just right prior to 10/7, but in general, with what was going on in Gaza in the last decade. After all, to them, it seemed whatever it is they were doing (or not doing) was having a decent effect and there was little (outside of rocket barrage) to fear. I also wouldn't be surprised if Bibi pulled resources away from Gaza. All in all, perhaps we tend to give more credit to IDF (and Shin Bet/Mossad) than they deserve. If there's any positive that can come of this, is that the security branches and organizations are going to look a whole lot different going forward.
So many posts devoted to arguing about videos, laptops and tunnels. Meanwhile the death toll is now at over 13000 people. Proportional to the population in Gaza, that is equivalent to twice the amount of Corona deaths in the U.S.
What part of my post doesn't make sense to you? That Israel regularly flies over Gaza (and the West Bank, for that matter) for the purpose of spying? That they've got the technological ability to do so? Or that they've razed Gaza over the last 6 weeks? For reference, below is my complete post that you responded to.
I'm reading suspicious activities along the Gaza border have been reported for months by soldiers, but these were ignored because it were female soldiers who were doing that. Well, misogynicism turned deadly if true.
You know the saying lie gets around half the world before the truth has a chance to put its pants on. With social media now, everyone tries to come out with a video ASAP. My wife has entered in a very pro Palestine sub TikTok and it seems for every IDF video there is some rando dissecting it for not being what it says it is. Going forward Armies are gonna need to have social media departments. I am talking sergeant Smith in charge of counter attacking enemy videos on TikTok and two people assigned to Twitter (or whatever replaced it). As a history major, it is wild to see conflicts crank out footage in real time.
And even with that, there is a lot of missinformation, and selective memory. Even with video evidence it is still difficult to change people's perceptions.