Hamas Attacks, Israel Responds Part III. Is It Finally Over?

I hope so too, but Israel has already announced that it will begin restricting aid tomorrow.

 

Well,
I've been told that Infantino was at the Gaza peace talks in Egypt with a by Trvmp initiated wild card for Israel at the WC2026, for signing an end to the war.

 

I'm hearing reports the last (2?) bodies are very hard to recover, being covered by meters of debris as a result of Israeli bombing.
Might be hamas is lying about it, but to what end?

 

If one of them still is alive, that's a good thing to me. I presume hamas has reported them as probably dead, given where they were held is a large rubble mountain?

 

Perhaps, but the provisions for the returns of the remains of deceased hostages seem rather unambiguous, and it's not at all clear that Hamas hasn't returned the remains of hostages in its possession (as opposed those not in Hamas's possession).

This looks like bad faith on Israel's part.

 

Hamas will first have to make sure all Palestinians understand they still hold the power.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025...war-halted-who-is-clashing-with-hamas-in-gaza

Controversial Gaza activist, derogatorily called "Mr. FAFO" due to his performative antics and well known for his support of Hamas and raising an estimated $10 million to build a children's hospital, only to pocket the money, Saleh Al-Jafarawi, was killed today by unknown… pic.twitter.com/7NrkOhtZvE

— Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib (@afalkhatib) October 12, 2025

 

How are they supposed to have leverage by keeping secret they're alive?
You havenot got an advantage by having someone alive, while reporting he'/she's dead.
You only have (false) leverage by suggesting someone, who's been killed under the rubble to be alive.
The opposite you suggest makes no sense at all.

 

How many times did you fail the bar exam.

 

I used to know a guy who passed the bar on his 8th try.

 

Why?

The right to self-defense for a group when they are being repeatedly denied their rights is a core principle in international law.

Palestinians have been living in a state of Apartheid. They get held indefinitely without trial or crime. Movement of goods prior to 10.7 was highly restricted by the Israeli government. Israel certainly isn't a Democracy in the sense that Palestinians do not receive equal rights under the law.

Why do they deserve the same treatment as their oppressors?

 

Because attacks on non-combatants are a war crime. The IDF, Israel's civilian leadership involved in prosecuting the war, Hamas's military leadership, and Hamas's fighters all should be tried for war crimes.

 

There's a difference between fighting an oppressor and willy nilly murdering unarmed civilans.
Nobody can make a war crime/crime against humanity case against any hamas member, when it's about attacking military.
The non IDF victims of the 7th of 10th massacre are person by person a case for a crime against humanity charge against the combattants involved and the ones plotting it.

 

Your post doesnot make sense.

 

How's that going?

 

Yes. This said, today's terrorists are tomorrow's valid interlocutors, with whom one must negotiate, and who must therefore be removed from their status as criminals. It's a classic phenomenon, even if it's not pleasant.
I'm not saying it will happen in that case, nor that it's desirable. Just that it's not something unusual in former cases of liberation wars.