I'm not so sure. Hamas has been able to draw Israel into a massive escalation of this age-old conflict which has left Gaza in ruins, the entire population decimated, displaced and starving. Tens of thousands killed, the whole region left in ruins...the misery incalculable. Israelis are taking to the streets (in Tel Aviv and elsewhere) in record numbers to protest their governments policies in Gaza... ...for there to be any hope for peace in the region, there has to be a regime change in Israel. And hamas must be systematically degraded and/or destroyed (the former seems more likely given that hamas is a pervasive ideology that exists in both Gaza and WB and across the region). But I haven't heard any overt support for hamas here, none.
I literally just did. Not gonna go looking for posts, but he’s been at the very least Hamas-sympathetic.
I lurk in here a lot. When there is something to point to where Israel is to blame, multiple posts, regardless of factual reporting or any verified information. Then Hamas does something verifiable, like executing hostages before they can be rescued, and it's crickets. Like I said, it doesn't have to be overt. It usually isn't. But that doesn't mean it isn't there.
People are furious with respect to Israel's assault on an entire population and what looks like ethnic cleansing being perpetrated by the IDF... ...but I've not encountered a single pro hamas sentiment here.
That doesn’t necessarily imply that they support Hamas, it could just be that they hold Israel to a higher standard as a sovereign nation as opposed to a terrorist organization. But it does seem a little unfair that Israel is implicitly assumed to be the only party with agency in this matter.
or maybe they object to the wholesale slaughter of a helpless population by the Israeli war machine, and they are sickened and outraged by their own country's complicity in this cowardly assault. look, hamas has to go...there's almost universal agreement there. But Israel has taken this opportunity to lay waste TO THE ENTIRE REGION. And this is just the latest round of hostilities in a conflict where Palestinians pay far, far more dearly...EVERY SINGLE TIME. In this case though, Israel has utterly demolished the whole, entire region and it's sickening, and brutal...AND CRIMINAL.
This is posted a lot and while I agree with you 100%, how it could be achieved is never part of the discussion. And referring to 10/7 as "an opportunity" is pretty cold.
well, it's not being achieved by turning all of gaza into a vast wasteland. Sinwar is now running hamas, hamas is active in the WB, there's probably still plenty of hamas in gaza and my guess, a much more radicalized Palestinian population overall. And Bibi uses all this stuff as an opportunity to advance his war of annihilation against his neighbors. After the six hostages were brutally killed (which was completely sickening and inexcusable btw, although I partially blame Bibi for this as well, for not doing enough to get them home safely), Bibi made some double-down comment suggesting he didn't see peace as possible with these monsters, or words to that effect. The sooner the world is rid of Bibi and his gang of criminals, the better.
I'm guessing what Stanger is talking about is the following phenomenon. Israel does X, there are a dozen of posters who rapidly come to criticism, denunciation, and some with open and vile attacks on Israel, Bibi, IDF, settlers, etc.... When Hamas does something, it's deadly silence, and when someone asks about this, the usual statement is "everyone here called Hamas out" or "nobody here supports Hamas". And while a handful of posters who criticize Israel are consistent on being unbias and call out terrorists for who they are, those are far and few in between. So are they ALL anti-Hamas, perhaps, but it appears most are definitely anti-Israel (anti-Israeli actions), and less so vocal about the other side. This is the same point that was raised around protests. The argument is that there aren't any anti-Hamas rallies b/c it's implied people are anti-Hamas. Sadly, I think this is a load of horse manure.
Regarding “regime” change coming up in posts in this thread reinforces what I’ve been posting since prior to this current conflict. People just don’t understand Israeli politics. Getting Bibi out of power is a good thing, no doubt but this belief that the past year will bring in left government and that’s just not true. In some polling that’s out there the name that keeps popping up on top is Naftali Bennett. He’s no Bibi but he’s arguably more of a right leaning hawk.
This is a sentiment I also see quite often and one that is easy to agree with, but also one that misses the opinion of the Israeli public. Yes, nobody here is a fan of Bibi (especially myself), and many many Israelis despise him as well. But if you were to listen to Israelis on the streets, read the Israeli newspapers and absorb much information coming directly from Israel, the picture is a lot less clear. The polls do indicate Bibi is incredibly unpopular, and even in his own coalition government, the latest poll showed only 44% would support his re-election. Also, overwhelming majority want to bring hostages home. However, as it pertains to dealing with Hamas, the how, the when, and the what, as well, as what post this war Gaza looks like (ex. does IDF maintain the Philadelphi corridor or not), things become a lot less clear. In short, yes, Israel should get rid of Bibi, but the sentiment that things would drastically change with Hamas and Gaza is often misleading.
Israelis are going to have to ask themselves if all this hawkishness is improving their standing in the world and making them safer, ultimately. I think these hawks are leading them all over a cliff.
Not only that, but as collateral damage it makes the world very unsafe for non-Israeli Jews....You know, the ones who didnot vote for governments annihilating Gaza.
On the one hand, any nation that's been under attack for generations is bound to vote for whomever promises them security. On the other, it's obvious to almost every single person on earth except for Israeli voters that selecting bellicose ethnofascists for government isn't ever going to end well. Nor should it. But Israel keeps slamming the car door on their testicles and will continue to do so. When Netanyahu was urging people to assassinate Yitzhak Rabin, it was unthinkable that he would someday be PM. Now it's just a matter of time before Ben-Gvir is.
Israelis have been asking themselves this question since 1948. Jews and particularly Israelis have an understanding that being safe comes as a result of not being doves. There is long history of Jews not being consistently safe at any point in our existence. The hostility towards Jews and let’s not bullshit that it’s actually Israelis, because it’s pretty much the commonality is that one thing. I still see Arabs and Muslims around MENA and the globe take to the streets about what they do to each other. Why is that? Being a dove and befriending many Arabs didn’t keep my cousin or his beautiful wife or kids from getting slaughtered so I’m not sure why you think a more pacified approach benefits Israel. Oh yeah, I know why you believe that. It’s because you have absolutely no clue about Israel, the culture, the politics and most importantly the history of our people.