Not this again. The rockets started literally as soon as the last Israeli left Gaza. The "blockade" was a result of a murderous terrorist group sworn to your destruction being "elected" to power as your neighbor. Strictly speaking about Gaza, if the answer to your question is "supporting Hamas" or joining Hamas and there's nothing else, then perhaps you don't really love your children. Need I to link countless videos of mothers/fathers/grandparents wishing nothing more than for their loved ones to become martyrs? To willingly send your son/daughter to become a shaheed? Perhaps the answer is fighting for different leadership, different education, coexistence? How about not swearing to destroy your neighbor simply b/c they are of a different faith? Not that you care or planning to see things any differently, but the real answer lies somewhere in the middle. It's not "Israel should or shouldn't do this" or "Palestinians should or shouldn't do that", but rather "Israeli and Palestinians should and shouldn't do XYZ".
Hamas could surrender, I know, I know, that is not going to happen. Or the blockade is to stop Hamas from getting rockets. But it has not worked obviously.
Honest question, do you think if Israel left Gaza alone and gave up the West Bank, would a Palestinian state stop attacking Israel in a 2 state solution ?
Fatah and Hamas have already set out their conditions for a peace treaty with israel and their position aligns with international law. The Palestinian position was set out pretty much in the late 1980s with their declaration of independence. East Jerusalem is a massive part of that, so if you include East Jerusalem as part of the West Bank, then yes, the Palestinians have pretty much renounced their claims to the areas occupied by israel before 1967. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_43/177
I don't think you understand the meaning of "from the river to the sea" or have heard the many Palestinian voices (and some elsewhere in the world) calling for the destruction of Israel. Jews were evicted from the Old City of Jerusalem in 1948 and could not even visit until the 1967 war. After Israel regained control of the Old City, anyone could visit this historic and holy (to multiple religions) part of the world. Relevant Wikipedia pages have been hijacked by Jew haters. Wikipedia is not a reliable source of info for anything related to Israel!
An then what? Israel magically stops running an apartheid state and maybe in a few decades down the road the west will grow a conscience like they did for South Africa and stop supporting Israel - dare I say sanction them? Kind of naive, don't you think?
What'd you expect, they'd just keep calm and carry on with their lives in an open air prison and just "accept" the land they lost to illegal settlements in the West Bank? Even after Israel withdrew, they did not resolve the underlying issues that drive the conflict. 1-The core issues like the status of Jerusalem, the right of return for Palestinian refugees, the borders, and the existence of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. This had continued to fuel tensions. 2-The continued military control since they maintained control over its borders, airspace, and maritime access, which has been perceived by many Palestinians as an ongoing occupation. 3-In the West Bank, Israeli settlements and military presence continued to expand fuelling tension the situation. This adds another dimension to dehumanizing the Palestinians - why aren't those "lesser" beings just be content with the crap leftovers I'm throwing at them when I know full well that I (Israel) and my pals (the West) would NEVER put up with it in reverse?
Hamas only changed their mission statement supporting a 2 state solution in 2017 (before it being the whole destruction of Israel). And that's with an asterisk as I understand it because it still mentions liberating all of Palestine "from the river to the sea" .. which leads one to believe they view a 2 state solution as a transitional phase.
https://aje.io/u5ps4s see also https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna24235665 Hamas leaders such as Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, Khaled Mashaal and Ismail Haniyeh have all explicitly offered long term peace in return for israeli withdrawal to the pre1967 borders. The term they have used is a Hudna, that second article explains the difference between the English “truce” or “ceasefire” and the Arabic “Hudna”. israel has rejected each time.
This seems a bit ambiguous ... 20. Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. However, without compromising its rejection of the Zionist entity and without relinquishing any Palestinian rights, Hamas considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of the 4th of June 1967, with the return of the refugees and the displaced to their homes from which they were expelled, to be a formula of national consensus.
They don’t want to concede that 1948 (and the pre1948 Zionist movement envisioned by Herzl) was acceptable. But they accept a de facto state of israel in its pre 1967 borders. That should be enough for the israelis, if they are interested in actual peace. Have Hamas explicitly offered long term peace multiple times or not? Are the terms they offered in line with international law, or not? Do you believe in international law, or not?
Nearly a hundred people killed in a bombing on a school and mosque which the israelis bombed during morning prayers. https://apple.news/ABJvw5ii-RJ2NDJBWb8mOhg
More info: NEW: @cnn confirms a US-made GBU-39 small diameter bomb was used in an Israeli strike on a school and mosque compound in Gaza which killed at least 93 Palestinians according to local officials (h/t) to @easybakeovensz for helping identify the weapon pic.twitter.com/LLtsjiuFC5— Allegra Goodwin (@goodwinallegra) August 10, 2024
Israeli strike in Gaza kills more than 70, hospital head says https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8erk37yn2no
we can hear the screams of families trapped in the school being burned alive in Gaza city , but are unable to help due to Israeli occupation forces cutting water access .— حسام شبات (@HossamShabat) August 10, 2024
I don't know how news of casualties come out so rapidly from Gaza. And as you could expect, different set of news comes from Israel. 1822212324972810720 is not a valid tweet id
The last few posts are exactly why Hamas hides in places where IDF will get bad publicity if they are attacked.
They killed a large number of people when bombing a mosque and school full of refugees whilst people were praying. Nobody else made them look evil. They did it themselves.