http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-585546,00.html A GOVERNMENT-backed course is encouraging pupils under 16 to experiment with oral sex, as part of a drive to cut rates of teenage pregnancy. Family campaigners believe that the course, called A Pause, is having the reverse effect by exciting the sexual interest of children. The scheme, which has been pioneered by Exeter University and is backed by the Departments of Health and Education, trains teachers to discuss various pre-sex “stopping points” with under-age teenagers. This is: A) A legitimate starting point for a frank discussion of sex education in schools in the USA. B) Yet another excuse to make jokes about bad oral hygiene. C) A sign that '****sucker' will replace 'wanker' as a standard UK insult. D) The best damn reason to go to Great Britain since they opened up Buckingham Palace.
What the hell kind of kids are these if they need Da Man urging them to have oral sex? I was doing it before I was 16 and I didn't need anyone to tell me to do it.
I think that sort of ************ only happens on reservations. At 13, us affluent WASPs have enough money to pay slutty highschool girls for blowjobs.
While, yes, it shows I was born too early (too late, also. God, growing up in the 80's sucked!), this article shows why us Americans don't need the government's help in making our lives better. (I realize it's a year old, but I doubt the numbers have changed that much): http://www.uwire.com/content/topnews031802001.html The relevant paragraph: While abstinence may be one reason for a decline in teen pregnancy, the rise in popularity of oral sex may be another. According to a report in The Washington Post, oral sex has become a fad for teens, whereas penile-vaginal activity among high school students has appeared to have leveled off or somewhat declined.