IMO, probably not. I think that after Trump fails this year, it will be the end of Trump as a presidential candidate but not the end of MAGA . Politicians are always talking about their "base" (like a PR person talking about "branding"), and the MAGA base is the easiest to rile up. As long as there is a MAGA type base in the party (Tea Party, John Birch Society, Christian Right Wing, etc) the party is doomed to have the crazies dominate the party and the George H Bush types have no chance. I remember Pat Buchanan once saying that "you have to throw raw meat at the base" - and say the stuff they want you to hear. Crazy. But to be honest, we've seen the Dems also leaning more and more towards the crazies. We might be screwed.
We have? I'm not so sure about that. The Democrats have some crazies, but they don't seem to be in ascendance right now. What are you seeing that I'm not?
I am super depressed about how we are litigating some social issue. Not to bring stuff up that will send this into a different directions, but a lot of the cultural stuff seems nutty to me. Maybe its my age. But we would've just laughed off a lot of stuff before and not attack other people for it. One quick example, and its something Bill Maher brought up recently, there were recent public attacks on Cheryl Hines for not denouncing RFK Jr for supporting Trump - the attacks were made by some pretty public liberals. We would've never done that in the past; go after a spouse? What is that solving? I've worked on campaigns and on issues, and stuff like that was waaay off bounds at one point. Now it seems that everyone wants a quick "dunk" so they can get likes.
I did a quick search and only came up with one actor, someone I had never heard of before, who attacked her for that. As far as going after spouses, Republicans have a very long history of doing just that - Bill Clinton's wife and Barack Obama's wife, while those guys were president, come to mind very quickly.
I went through imdb and found only three shows that I may have seen him in, if I watched that particular episode: X-Files, Parks and Recreation, and one other that I can't remember now.
The latter was a film not a TV show---quite good psychological thriller/horror. And just to be clear, I don't care about Bradley calling out Hines. He's not a politician, meh. It's just Maher doing a "both sides" which is what Maher does best as opposed to any real insight.
So much of the anti-"cancel culture" discourse is just grousing about society making collective judgements.
I get the nitpick argument about Maher. But was there any blow back for Whitford saying that? Or, does anyone here think that its messed up?
And then Conservative media spent the next few days saying the guy was her husband's gay lover and they were having a lover's quarrel...