Take the battle to Google Interesting in that my first instinct was to refute the information at that site not based upon any really hard counter evidence, but rather based upon my "need" to Google...emotionally, I was not ready to hear that. Interesting. With that in mind, I've submitted an e-mail to Google asking them to answer the charges levied at the above link, and told them that I will not "Google" until they do... I'll post their answer, if any, here.
Re: Take the battle to Google I'm sure the people at Google will be crushed that you're not using their search engine. Especially since your decision is based on the paranoid assertions of some website called "google-watch".
Re: Re: Take the battle to Google Lately I've noticed that you, and others here, are very true to the comtemporary foundational interpretations of the term "Politics." While you argue all around the issues, I continue to ask the question: "Is it true?" I don't care if Google-watch is run by Bellevue's finest; if its accurate, its accurate. Short of conducting my own research, one of the next best things to do is to simply ask Google the question. Much of the truth may be gleaned, much of the direction of further investigative work, if any, can be gleaned from their response... Sorry if this cuts through your focus upon all the "electrons" swirling around the "nucleus" of the issue...
Re: Take the battle to Google Be afraid, be very afraid. I'm sure you've Googled the name "Chomsky" many times. John Ashcroft now has you in his database of loons that he is tracking down, one by one.
Dammit, if I enter ""virgin mary" worship "blessed little children" "lamb of god"" enough times, will it cancel out "naked or nekkid or buck naked"?