Good article on soccer from the perspective of a non-fan

Discussion in 'Business and Media' started by photar74, Aug 5, 2002.

  1. photar74

    photar74 New Member

    Jun 25, 2002
    West Philly
    I’m posting this article to show that despite the common wisdom on this board there are, in fact, thoughtful and intelligent sports fans who don’t watch club soccer. It was written by David Halberstam:

    http://espn.go.com/page2/s/halberstam/020802.html

    Of course, Halberstam is a member of a decidedly older generation, as he is now in his sixties. I think most people on this board would agree that as far as the future of soccer in America goes, what people like him think doesn’t really matter. Also, how could we really expect many people who grew up when he did to really care about a game to which they had little exposure?

    Now on to why I liked this article. First, Halberstam presents it in a decidedly subjective manner, with few exceptions. When it comes to judgments about the game, they are always presented as HIS opinions, not as the moralizing, dogmatic statements often found from blow-hard television and newspaper pundits. Secondly, he doesn’t actually hate soccer. I am always baffled by people who hate a sport they have almost never seen—their hatred obviously comes from something other than the game itself. Third, he is actually interested and aware of the various international demographic trends of the sport, and can accurately place soccer within a larger, non-sports related context. I think that this is something we all need to do more often in order to understand and hypothesize about the state of soccer in this country.

    What I didn’t like about the article was his notion that the rules need to be changed in order to favor artistry and attacking play. Now, I wish that we did see more artistry and attacking play throughout the soccer world, but I really am not sure if any rules changes can be made to facilitate this. In fact, most rule changes meant to increase scoring would probably make the game far less interesting (i.e., significantly relaxing offsides, thereby turning most goals into ugly cherry-picks).

    Anyway, I think it’s a good article. While we disagree with him, we can’t say he’s an idiot and send him angry email.
     
  2. Ringo

    Ringo Member

    Jun 10, 2002
    Rough and Ready
    Club:
    Yeovil Town FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    but angry emails are so much fun ....
     
  3. Flying Weasel

    Flying Weasel Member

    Mar 22, 2001
    Harrisburg, PA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  4. Dr. Wankler

    Dr. Wankler Member+

    May 2, 2001
    The Electric City
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
  5. Dr. Wankler

    Dr. Wankler Member+

    May 2, 2001
    The Electric City
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Oh, and as someone pointed out on each of the other two threads, he decidedly DID NOT see "Britain" win the World Cup in 1966.
     
  6. Viking64

    Viking64 Member

    Feb 11, 1999
    Tarheel State
    Well I'm glad he posted it anyway, because for some reason I missed it until it was re-posted.

    Not a bad read.
     

Share This Page