With the National Team Team's Goals Pre-Assisted Strict criteria: Direct pass→Direct pass→Goal Messi: 20.55% Maradona: 12.07% Pelé: 9.80% Cristiano: 3.52% Total Goal Contribution % Goals Assists (Opta) Assists (Non-Opta) Pre-Assists (Opta) An interesting fact is that Messi has a similar percentage of open play goals where he pre-assists himself Messi: 20.78% Pelé: 11.67% Maradona: 11.11% Cristiano: 0.97% So, Messi not only Pre-assists ~20% of his teammates' goals but also Pre-assists ~20% of his own goals. At least in the national team, he almost doubles Pelé and Maradona in this particular metric.
Estêvão First 49 Games Goals: 10 (3 PK, 1 FK, 1 Hdr) Assists: 10 Non-Opta: 2 Shots p90: 3.61 Key Passes p90: 2.13 Dribbles p90: 3.47 G+A p90: 0.885 Team Contribution 27/59: 45.76%
Trachta @ 10 Do you know more ++++ players with a lot of assists..in a full official season adding the National Team Games plus +++ with the official club Games???
Age at First Free-Kick (Game N°) Maradona: 16y 4m (14) Estêvão: 17y 7m (49) Cristiano: 18y 8m (43) Neymar: 19y 9m (166) Puskás: 20y 5m (128) Pelé: 21y (210) Messi: 21y 3m (150) Zico: 21y 5m (84) Goal N° Maradona: 3 Cristiano: 6 Estêvão: 15 Zico: 27 Messi: 58 Neymar: 86 Puskás: 108 Pelé: 264
Diego Armando Maradona's best seasons in relation to the maximum number of assists between the National Team and Clubs.. Which years were it??? you know that ???
Ronaldo Stats We've covered the incredible career of Ronaldo Nazário, "O Fenômeno" From his stunning breakthrough at Cruzeiro to his retirement for club and country, R9's stats showcase why he remains one of football's most iconic players.Ronaldo Luís Nazário de Lima 🇧🇷 career stats pic.twitter.com/ncYgjTsfG0— Mr.Idolo. (@Puskas1953) December 7, 2024 Calendar Year Stats
Do you have the full numbers of C.Ronaldo's career per 90 minutes Stats correctly ??? It's not C.Ronaldo's fault that Ronaldo Nazario ended his career too soon... due to injuries and nightlife later... .. A kind of unhealthy anti-professionalism . i have the Stats .. Of total Appearances only ..not per 90 minutes played . C. Ronaldo .. 1255 matches 916 goals 321 assists ( Non-Opta also including ) 0, 73 % goals 0, 25 % Assists ..
C. Ronaldo .. 1255 matches 916 goals 0, 84 % average Of goals ... Stats per 90 minutes played is correct this ????
Diego Armando Maradona All career Status : Argentinos Jr.. 166 matches 116 Goals Boca Juniors 40 matches 28 Goals ... Barcelona 58 matches 38 Goals Napoli 259 matches 115 goals Sevilla 29 matches 8 goals News Old Boys 5 matches 0 Goals Boca Juniors 31 7 Goals Argentina National Team Side : 91 matches 34 goals Total ... 679 matches ............ 346 Goals .... Why do you do to put Diego Armando Maradona with 344 Goals always here only ??? Where is wrong in the List above in your view or general knowledge about Diego Armando Maradona.. ???
... .. .... Copa do Rei Rodada Data Cidade Por Adversário Resultado Pos. 4ª eliminatória - jogos de ida 01/12/92 F Alcazar C F 0:2 não esteve no plantel 4ª eliminatória - jogos de volta 30/12/92 C ... Alcazar CF 5:0 1 2 90' 5ª eliminatória - jogos de ida 12/01/93 F ...CP Mérida 0:1 não esteve no plantel 5ª eliminatória - jogos de volta 19/01/93 C .. CP Mérida 1:1 1 90' Oitavas de final - Jogos de ida 02/02/93 C .. Valencia 0:0 90' Oitavas de final - Jogos de volta 16/02/93 F... Valencia 2:0 não esteve no plantel Plantel: 3, Onze inicial: 3, Suplente utilizado: 0, Suplente não utilizado: 0, Suspenso: 0, Lesionado: 0, Ausência: 0 the Wrong ... is at Sevilla ... the right thing is : 29 matches .... 7 goals ... 679 matches .. 345 goals ...
yes ... Great ...Numbers .. for sure ... better than .. Ronaldo Nazario the bigger Fat .. C. Ronaldo ... 0, 80 % goals ..per90minutes Ronaldo Nazario de Lima .... 0, 76 % goals ...per90minutes ..
Man, you need to relax and learn to read a bit—pay attention. The comparison is based on the fact that Ronaldo Nazário played 615 matches in his career, and those are Cristiano Ronaldo’s numbers from his first 615 matches. No number is incorrect: Ronaldo’s average non-penalty goals per90 is 0.662, and Cristiano’s in his first 615 matches is 0.562. And another thing, percentages are used as a base 100 relative to a number. It’s not correct to say a player has a 0.70% goal average. If anything, it’s 0.7 goals per match or 0.7 goals per 90 minutes. When I show percentages, I base them on what percentage of the team’s goals the player contributed to.. It’s the percentage of the team’s goals the player participated in with their goals and assists. In this case, Ronaldo Nazário contributed to 50.32% of his team’s goals, while Cristiano contributed to 45.64% in his first 615 matches. Understand?
yes .. I did it already and i know this too... the same thing at comparison Michel Platini vs Ronaldinho Gaucho... TeamGoals averages ..JUventus years ...vs Barcelona years ... yes I understood pretty well the logic behind this... pretty easy for me so Why do you do to Put Diego Armando Maradona with 344 goals ????
You mention Verstappen there. I know you're an F1 fan (more than me). I have lately come to the conclusion that in a way you can compare his impact/influence/significance with the one of Cruijff. Without writing a whole essay, I guess in this way you can compare the influence or importance; 1) He and his dad are the only ones of his country to score a decent amount of points in F1 (all others are on 4 career points or lower). It is not really a major 'sport' here. Neighboring Belgium has had more F1 race winners or points scorers. 2) He is one of only two drivers to win the championship twice while his car did not win the constructor championship (2021, 2024). He is the first in 41 years to win the championship with a car that is ranked 3rd or lower (some say this was because Gasly/Albon/Perez are bad but this does not really compute). Remarkably, he still wins the championship if you delete the first handful races. 3) This was preceded by a season of singular dominance (winning 19 of 22 races in 2023; 86.3% success rate is far ahead of anyone else in history). All sort of Financial Times articles appeared about how this hurt the sport. Typically, it was less of an immediate and pressing issue when e.g. Hamilton/Mercedes was dominant or Schumacher/Ferrari was dominant. Fast forward one year later (2024) and pretty early the BBC came with "Is the Red Bull still the best car? If you walk around the paddock and talk to the team bosses, I've had a couple of very senior people in Formula One this year say to me: "I think Verstappen's got two or three tenths [per lap] on everybody as a driver." 4) His win/points record in wet weather is apparently top two all-time (depends a bit on how you count whether he is per race #1 or #2). 5) He has won races while starting 17th (in the rain, and 14th in the rain). That is really rare. In fact, he has won more races than anyone else in history while starting outside the top 10, top 8 or outside top six. This might mean he's a mediocre qualifier but again, this does not really compute. 'Funnily' we see there the same dynamics and mechanisms as in football (or other sports). Inevitably he'll be placed behind the Argentines, the Brazilians, the English, the Germans... Regardless of how many (race) wins he has. That is how the conspirator and pseudoprofessor forces will always align. F1 their own official ranking did not place him as the best driver of the 2024 year! (not too different from football...) This only confirms the obvious, once again. Spoiler (Move your mouse to the spoiler area to reveal the content) Show Spoiler Hide Spoiler Some, particularly in the English press, wonder if these all-out battles against Norris, on the edge or even beyond legality, are not a sign of nervousness... Damon Hill, consultant for Sky F1, insinuates that Verstappen used his Red Bull in Mexico "as a simple weapon" against his rival. The 1996 world champion, who probably has some memories on the subject, concludes by stating that "you can't just have a 'Demolition derby' to keep your place." "I love him too much as a driver not to be sorry to see him behave like that," adds Martin Brundle. Verstappen responds to these assertions without mincing words: "I'm in my tenth season of F1 and I'm a triple world champion. I know what I'm doing. I like to win and I don't like to lose, and besides, who likes that? As for the rest... There's a word that starts with 'f' that I can't use anymore... [...] The Verstappen clan seems to want to give credence to the idea that he is the victim of a cabal orchestrated by British journalists and consultants, who are pro-Norris by nature. Indeed, after Hill and Brundle, it is Johnny Herbert, also a consultant on Sky, who attacks the Red Bull driver by castigating his "horrible mentality". Problem: the former driver was part of the college of stewards who sanctioned the Dutchman in Mexico [two Brits, one Saudi and one German, yes...]. Jos Verstappen accuses his former colleague of bias and orders him to stop speaking out about his son, since he would be both judge and jury. "It's not bias, I'm just expressing my opinion," Herbert replies. "I hold my tongue when I exercise my duties as steward, but the rest of the time, I have the right to complete freedom of speech." [...] "Where are the English journalists? Already at the airport?" Max Verstappen cynically asks at a press conference. https://www.statsf1.com/en/2024/sao-paulo.aspx https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKc5qM9xJdk https://www.telegraph.co.uk/formula-1/2024/11/24/max-verstappen-world-champion-not-in-top-ten/ https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/the-15-best-f1-drivers-of-all-time/ (of course, just as with Cruijff, Van Dijk etc. all of the actual mathematical models rate him way higher than "outside the top 10" in their job, lolz) Caveat: I saw in the main only the evening races. https://x.com/balcio_nl/status/1868415571832017027
I would think, as hard as it is to compare like I alluded to, it would seem like (and general opinion/perception would probably align with this I'm thinking by now) he could be picked out within a group of perhaps 7 candidates for best ever drivers all things considered (in terms of the top level reached, but in a sustained way for a while) which would also include maybe Juan Manuel Fangio (yes of course it's even harder to compare his era to later times in general - for sure for greatest he must be up there anyway but quite possibly also best - it's curious he was quite old in his prime of course and whether the type of cars driven impacts this could be food for thought I guess), Jim Clark, Ayrton Senna, prime Michael Schumacher, prime Fernando Alonso, prime Lewis Hamilton....(I guess potentially an unfulfilled talent like Gilles Villeneuve could be thrown in, maybe although this could be a speculative call the same could be said re: pre-injury Robert Kubica even, and Alain Prost would at least be close for both best and greatest - I tend to think that although he was a little older than Senna and also decided to concentrate on race performance once it seemed clear Senna often/normally would out qualify him, in a more modern environment with less retirements etc or more competition between top teams Senna's outright speed advantage, as well as wet weather driving, might amount to more of a distinct advantage than it did when they both drove at McLaren in the 80s though). Maybe I should keep it succinct on a football forum, but yeah in a nutshell I think he could be similarly in the upper echelon in terms of racing driver performance, as Cruyff was in terms of footballer performance. In some ways though it's harder to even make guesstimates between the top candidates in a sport like that I'd think. The wet weather comment is interesting anyway, because it's not something it seems that gets regularly mentioned like it did for Senna or Schumacher ("Rain meister"), or indeed Gilles Villeneuve I suppose too. There does seem to be a correlation between general performance/speed and really being 'different' in wet weather (although in overall 'lesser' drivers I suppose there is some variation - drivers such as Alesi, Barrichello, Fisichella perhaps IIRC if anything would rank a bit higher in wet weather compared to others in general, while others like Jarno Trulli, Mika Hakkinen probably, prime Daniel Ricciardo perhaps too I would think had more outstanding speed in the dry and specifically in qualifying laps than in the wet which could even be a 'weak point' or disliked condition - although Senna also said he didn't really like driving in the extreme wet despite being better than everyone at it I seem to remember!).
It has been estimated that the car explains up to 90% of the variation (for the 2014-2021 era anyway; he was until 2017-18 still a teenager of course) but like I said, I guess there is now enough proof/bits/data to credibly compare the significance and impact in a similar way as a Cruijff. It starts with the question why suddenly a Dutchman ends up at the top echelons anyway, it is definitely not because it is an commercially attractive proposition, or because his region/nation has a history in the business (there is virtually no prior history! although some mechanics have worked for Schumacher in particular; names like Toet, or Vd Grind who made bespoke and specially designed Bridgestone tires for Schumacher). One example: he now shares with Senna the record for most consecutive pole positions; I think it only adds to the shine when it is split between two different seasons (with two different cars). At the very same time he has also the most wins in history when starting a race outside the top 6/top 8 or top 10. Often I tend to be on the sceptic/suspicious side if anything but over time some data points start to add up and then I might flip to the other end. In general it is rare/infrequent to win a championship with a car that is by universal acclaim not the (joint-)best (for 4/5ths of the season at least), preceded by a season that smashed many ancient records (86.4% win percentage, previous best was 75.0% attained in 1952 - which I already said above). He has said himself though that he'll not be in the sport until his mid-30s and retire early and not hang around until he has all the stats on his side. I'm sure though Cruijff remains the better known person around the world (another one, outside sport, is Henk Sneevliet that every Chinese kid learns in school about, it is mandatory; that is already well over 1 billion people). Quite possibly Cruijff is/was also more 'liked' although you'll also quickly see some/many defenses in favor of Verstappen. Of all the drivers he has spoken to, Verstappen stands out to Brundle as he is ‘so grounded’ when speaking one-on-one with him. “I like Max, talking to Max. I find him very grounded and very straightforward." Whatever, I wanted to share my thoughts with you about how in some ways you can compare significance or impact - making an actual difference. His dad Jos had actually a pretty poor upbringing - if poverty exists. Definitely not a posh boy (he came of age in a time when his region Limburg went into big economic decline as well).