I listened to the whole segment several times and don't understand your rush to explain it away at all. First up, Trump is a liar. But it is hard to know in which direction he is lying. IMO this is a classic case where he rushed in to brag, then obfuscate. He may of course have been lying he met with him. That could be the lie. After all, Musk got caught out lying in the same way. We simply don't know if either man met with Putin, or indirectly or what. What we do know 100%, is since leaving office, Trump met with Zelensky (phone), Orban and Bibi (f2f). Orban is a Putin surrogate, and no doubt he conveyed a message. I am fairly certain he has communication with Putin, but most likely it was indirect via Orban and other surrogates. Then he just blurted it out ...
I agree it's a stupid media fixation but there is a real related campaign fixation. For instance in the leadup to '20, RVAT etc was heavily focussed on soft GOP voters who might switch to Biden - there were 1000s of these switchers, suburban college educated was one demo - but also there were even Obama/Trump switchers ... In '24 it's different because you don't so much need to persuade Trump '20 voters to switch (though this demo exists thanks to J6). There is a big focus on Biden '20 voters who have gone soft. This is one reason why Kamala has more upside potential than Trump. He's got a hard ceiling. But Kamala can try to turn out as much of the Biden '20 vote as possible, but get new voters under 29, as well as low propensity women who might now turnout. You are correct that these groups mostly are not undecided about Trump. The real issue is whether they can be turned out.
The “weird”stuff really hurt him (and republicans in general) because it mocked him….something he cannot stand. A line like what you proposed(or harsher) would have broken him.
Really good job….though to be fair to other journalists ….its much easier to control the interview when you control the mic.
It's amazing what cos-play this all is when you stand back and admire it. An insane man in nappies is pretending to be a presidential strongman while an actual prosecutor and vice president of the nation has to act all reasonable about it while simultaneously trolling
I’ve been reconsidering my previous comment where I doubted whether the debate would change much, primarily because Trump’s supposed implosion - to me - wasn’t any different from, and in many cases was toned down from, what he’s been doing for years at his public appearances. I still think that’s largely true. But I think, too, that the issue might be broader than I previously argued, based mostly on which groups constitute the pool of so-called persuadable voters. The focus in here, and in much of the coverage I’ve seen, has equated “undecided,” or independent voters with persuadables. And, fine, those people exist, even though many just seem like nut jobs when they’re given time in the spot light. But the persuadable category has to be more multi-dimensional than that. Like old school GOPers who just can’t take it anymore (for whom things like Dick Cheney’s endorsement might mean something). Or casual voters who don’t follow politics closely, might have seen the debate, and for whom seeing Trump do his thing was a new experience that got their attention. Or young, newly eligible voters who don’t tend to turn out in high percentages, who never would have watched two 80 year old white dudes yelling at each other for 90 minutes, but see Harris all over TikTok and decided to tune in (Swift’s endorsement doesn’t hurt here, either). Or those young, male voters who maybe weren’t eligible to vote in ‘20, like Rogan’s podcast, are Trump-curious, but hadn’t paid close attention to him until Tuesday night. Or some voters in the military, who were already annoyed at Trump’s Arlington NC stunt, have heard him repeatedly disparage people in uniform, and maybe only this week heard Harris’ full-throated statements of support for the military, saw the two potential commanders-in-chief side-by-side, and concluded that Harris seems up for the job while Trump doesn’t. It’s a long list, could be longer, and is perhaps a bit wishful. Still, I don’t see Harris-Walz losing anyone the way they’re going. For Trump, it’s possible, even if we all know the losses will never be large. But a dozen categorical pin pricks in his support, each leaking a trickle of voters can make a difference in an election this close. My wife’s parents passed away in 2016 and early ‘17. They lived in Atlanta, where my wife’s sister and her family also live. Her father was a former naval aviator. Both were rock-solid, old school Republicans. She and I have spoken, numerous times over the years since about what they - especially her father - would have made of Trump. Also, how they’d react to a grandson of theirs in Atlanta who’s decided to begin transitioning to a granddaughter, but that’s a different story. Anyway, maybe it’s wishful thinking, but it’s hard to believe they’d have stayed on the Trump train. I’m not sure they’d vote for a Democrat, but you never know. And we’ll never know.
Haitians fearing backlash for that dog/cat eating malarkey. JV Vance like "oh well. Whatevs" My story for @nbcnightlynews from Springfield, Ohio where Haitian immigrants told me they are hurt and scared because of the baseless claims being spread about them by former President Trump and Senator JD Vance. pic.twitter.com/0gkEOHg4mD— Yamiche Alcindor (@Yamiche) September 12, 2024
NEW: A General Services Administration spox tells NPR that as of 11 a.m. ET today there have been 306,422 visitors to https://t.co/WXfQ7iuhYq referred from Taylor Swifts’s URL she shared on Instagram last night— Elena Moore (@ElenaMMoore) September 11, 2024 Most of these will be first time voters and lean liberal/progressive, probably quite strongly. They certainly won't be "pro-life". All Trump and especially Vance had to do was keep their stupid mouths shut. incElon Musk offering to impregnate her was just the cherry/turd on top. That 300K will probably treble by this time next week. Since it's nationwide, it's not enough in itself but an extra 10-15k Harris votes in Michigan, Penn and Wisconsin could make a big difference
“He is like one of those big balloons when you stick a pin in and it swirls around the room until it comes down to nothing.” — Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), talking about Donald Trump on CNN.
seeing clips of the the Tw@t's debate performance will (surely to God!) scare the crap out of young votres. but I think the H-W campaign would be well advised to run ads showing his "greatest hits" that they may not be familiar with - to reinforce just how bad he has always been, and make it clear that Tuesday wasn't just a poor night for him. it wouldn't hurt to remind people of all ages, actually. there's so much to choose from - mocking a disabled man, "inject with bleach", "good people on both sides". "losers in the military" etc etc. he's on the ground - start kicking!
It's hobson's choice: correct him on every lie and the whole debate would break down, plus the cultists' BS whining about bias acquires some superficial plausibility. A handful of corrections on not just blatant, but actually bizarre lies reminds people that he's the liar they've been told he is. The non-hardcore cultists will absorb that and be demotivated, not enough to vote Dem in large numbers, but enough to not vote at all or do a write-in. I wouldn't be surprised to see the GOP side with a noticeable level of undervoting (people voting for a party's down-ballot candidates but not candidate at the top of the ticket) come November.
Yeah, I haven't been following her, but I recall how she used to be. I was wondering if it was a different person with the same name. Like me being mistaken for a 6'5" Black point guard who played for Duke in the '90s.
Who hates Frum around here? He is a conservative but has been on the side of democracy making a lot of sense for the last few years. I actually prefer to listen to From than the likes of Kristol.
This same neo nazi called Stephen Miller who said last year that: "Trump will implement ‘spectacular migration crackdown". What can be "spectacular about a crackdown? The number of heads being cracked by some wannabee storm troopers? How many people can they put in camps in a record time?
This gruff looking white dude called Bill Moynihan (sp?) who is vehemently against immigrants coming to Springfield, evidently suffers from DEEP economic anxiety.
He was anti-Trump a decade before Trump set foot on that damn escalator. Even before Bush left office, it was clear that he was troubled by that administration's policy failures - as he put it in one interview "Who? Us? isn't going to cut it" - and the birther bullshit was a breaking point. As an admirer of his style and a good deal of his politics, I suspect he'd find a lot to admire in Pep's response to the Super League fiasco: "it's not sport [politics] if you can't lose."
Speaking of David Frum "Haitians are eating cats in Ohio.""No.""Possibly it's geese and ducks.""You liked Duck Dynasty. They killed and ate ducks.""Outside city limits.""You voted to legalize open carry of guns inside Ohio cities." "That's for scaring people, not for shooting birds."— David Frum (@davidfrum) September 12, 2024
Back when Miller was emerging into the limelight, I read a profile which did something of a deep dive into his background and spoke to people who'd known him back in high school, where he'd always been outspokenly right wing. One friend who'd joined him some of his "edginess" towards liberals and progressives in the school corridors said "what you have to understand about Stephen is that, Jewish or not, he's SS. This is what he is." For that guy and his friends, it had been about shocking the pearl-clutchers: a bit of fun to make a point, a tool to pick up from time to time and then put away. It was the only tool Miller could use, or wanted to. By the time graduation came around, Miller was doing his "provocations" alone. His friends grew up. He hasn't