Correct. Although going after this made me remember some wonderful childhood moments. Both of those kits are absolutely perfect. This was such a fun Chile team as well.
Sometimes the manager isn't the deciding factor. Argentina still boasts Messi, Enzo, Álvarez, Infantino, Mac Allister, Martínez, and others. Spain has lesser talents than Argentina, but better players than Ancelotti, Pochettiono had. de la Fuente still has Yamal. Argentina has the most influential player ever on the team, and his name isn't Messi.
Well, that's not what happened, though, is it? The arm is at his side, in a natural position. He is not making his silhouette larger by bringing his arm away from his side. He gains no advantage from anything that happens here. There is no competent official thats calling that play a handball.
I'm guessing that he does care about individual honors, but like you, I'm guessing as well. I dont mind the 3rd place game, TBH. (Shrugs.)
He deliberately moves his arm into the ball, the "silhouette" analysis doesn't come into it, you can't do that. "Gains no advantage"?!? I won't waste my time discussing this with you any further if that's your level of bias.
I'd be shocked if Kane isn't still playing for a club like Bayern or Man Utd in 2029/30. And that implies he'll be in one more WC. He hasn't shown any signs of decline. Yeah, 4 years is a long time in football, but he can afford to decline some and still be worth including.
He should be nowhere close to win that award, no matter what happens in the final - even if he scores a hattrick. You shouldn't award a trophy for a guy who relaxes for six or seven months in the MLS league with his former buddies from Barcelona.
Yup. I think Mbappe plays 90 minutes on Saturday. I'm guessing too but the guess is supported by the fact that he played nearly a full match against the Norway B team and Iraq when those results were secured long before the final whistle.
Those who live close to Miami or just dont care as long as they can watch a fifa game. Some of us can't/won't spend $3k+ for a football match, but there are others who would. Just put a big game in a city with high income demographics and a big latino population and the seats will pretty much sell themselves.
Maybe when "big" sides play, but I think that players from "small" nations, which play such games once in half a century or less, look forward to those games. As fans of Madrid we've all grown accustomed to only winning, but for many a third place, which in many other sports has proper meaning, is a success and a source of pride. Moreover, we like to think of a career while it lasts in terms of winning, but I believe that players, when they look back, they still reflect on those second and third places as an achievement. Just imagine walking into someone's home and this person was second- and third-best in some sport. I think it means a lot later.
I need Argentina to be disappointed. Even if Spain winning makes 8 Barcelona players world cup winners. Literally, the only final most Madridistas didn't want to see. But here we are. If I had to pick the lesser of two evils, it would be Spain by a large margin.
I think "big latino population" is the biggest factor given that prices for the 3rd-place match dropped from $1,300+ to $500 after Argentina won the semi.
Well ... it doesn't matter the WC host those matches still fills up. The only redeemable value is that are typically end up being entertaining matches as the pressure of losing is off.
In previous WCs (before dynamic pricing), 3rd-place match tickets were much less expensive than any other KO round match (if you can call it a KO round match). If you are a travelling fan you probably have a return flight booked after the WC final. So, you're in the area, your country is playing and the prices are reasonable. That said, I was never tempted to attend one.
What Shaqiri and Xhaka did is far from Argentina players did though. What they did is a lot mor similar to what Morata did, for which he got a one match ban.
The Ballon d'Or has steadily lost its credibility since 2009/10 and has gradually become little more than a popularity contest. The criteria seem to change every single year, depending on who people want to win. One of the biggest problems is the excessive importance given to international tournaments. That immediately puts players from smaller national teams at a huge disadvantage, no matter how dominant they are at club level, Haaland in 2022/23 being the perfect example. It also creates a system where a player can be underwhelming for an entire club season, play six or seven great matches in the summer, and suddenly become the Ballon d'Or winner. 2009/10, Wesley Sneijder Sneijder should have won after leading Inter to a historic treble and the Netherlands to the World Cup final. He won the World Cup Silver Ball and finished with the Bronze Boot, only missing out on the Silver Boot because Thomas Müller had more assists. If you still think he did not deserve it, then Iniesta would have been a far more logical winner than Messi after scoring the World Cup winning goal and playing a key role in Barcelona's domestic double. 2011/12, Andrés Iniesta If international tournaments are supposed to matter this much, then Iniesta should have won. Spain won Euro 2012, he was named Player of the Tournament, and he remained one of Barcelona's best players throughout the season. Instead, the criteria suddenly shifted once again. 2012/13, Franck Ribéry Ribéry should have won after leading Bayern to the treble and being one of the best players in the world all season. Instead, FIFA extended the voting deadline after Ronaldo's play off hat trick against Sweden. Changing the voting rules in the middle of the process was one of the most embarrassing decisions in the history of the award. 2018/19, Virgil van Dijk Van Dijk was robbed. He completely transformed Liverpool's defence, was arguably their best player, helped eliminate Barcelona on the way to winning the Champions League, and finished the season as the UEFA Men's Player of the Year. His impact went far beyond goals and assists. 2019/20, Robert Lewandowski Canceling the award was ridiculous. Lewandowski produced one of the greatest individual seasons ever by a striker, led Bayern to the treble, and finished as top scorer in every competition. There wasn't even a close second that year. The excuse that COVID disrupted the season made no sense. If international tournaments played in the summer count, then the Champions League being completed in the summer should not suddenly invalidate the award. 2020/21, Robert Lewandowski After being denied the award in 2019/20, Lewandowski should have won in 2020/21 as well. He broke Gerd Müller's long standing Bundesliga scoring record with 41 league goals despite missing several matches through injury, won the Bundesliga, and was once again among the best players in the world. Bayern were eliminated by PSG in the Champions League quarter finals while Lewandowski missed both legs through injury, making it impossible to judge him based on that tie. Instead, the award went to Messi, largely because of Argentina's Copa América triumph, even though Barcelona's only trophy that season was the Copa del Rey. Once again, a short international tournament outweighed an entire club season. The inconsistency becomes even more obvious when looking at the 2024 Ballon d'Or. Lautaro Martínez won Serie A with Inter, was named Serie A MVP, won the Copa América with Argentina, and finished as the tournament's top scorer. Yet those achievements were suddenly not enough, despite very similar arguments being used to justify previous Ballon d'Or winners. 2022/23, Erling Haaland There is not much left to say. Haaland led Manchester City to a historic treble, broke the Premier League scoring record, won both the Premier League Player of the Season and Young Player of the Season, becoming the first player ever to win both awards in the same season. He also won both the PFA Players' Player of the Year and the FWA Footballer of the Year. If that is still not enough to win the Ballon d'Or, then nobody really knows what the criteria are. As for the 2024 Ballon d'Or, there is no need to expand on it. Everyone already knows why it became one of the most controversial editions in recent memory. The biggest problem is not that one player beats another. The real issue is that the criteria constantly change. One year club football matters most, the next year international tournaments become decisive. Sometimes statistics matter, sometimes they do not. Sometimes trophies are everything, sometimes they are ignored. An award cannot maintain its prestige when the standards change depending on who people want to win. Finally, let's not forget that the Ballon d'Or is decided by 100 journalists, not by objective performance metrics. The 2024 voting exposed just how inconsistent many of those voters are. Some even left Vinícius Júnior completely off their ballots despite his season, something that is impossible to justify using any consistent footballing criteria. When football's most prestigious individual award depends on subjective narratives rather than consistent standards, it inevitably loses credibility.
I would say this is mostly due to most of the other teams becoming worse, rather than England progressing.
I could see that being a bit unfair but 75% of years do not have a WC so those years are somewhat open to everyone. And moreover, Haaland could have won BD in 2026 - a WC year - if he had a better club season. I never got the sense that Euros count for a lot in Ballon d'Or voting. Ronaldo in 2016 was a coincidence - he probably wins BD w/o the Euro. I guess if its a 50/50 race between 2 players the Euros might act as a tiebreaker.
Your opinion doesn't really interest me after the way you've repeatedly trashed the Real Madrid forum and, on top of that, came into the Real Madrid board to insult its fans. It's also quite funny that you suddenly understand exactly what I wrote. Weren't you the one who said Apparently, my posts suddenly became perfectly understandable once you wanted to reply to them. Before addressing me, at least have the integrity to stand behind your own words and apologize for that behavior first. Until then, I have no interest in discussing football with you.
Yup i would have done the same if it was in LA. I mean both teams are stacked with stars even if a lot of them won't play in it. Hope you enjoy and its not too hot like it is over here right now.
I drove my boys 10 hours to watch a Spurs-PSG friendly (plus a trip to Disneyworld) -- of course I would go to France-England World Cup game, regardless that it is the bronze match.