Federal Warning of 'Spectacular Attack'

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by Chicago1871, Nov 15, 2002.

  1. MLSNHTOWN

    MLSNHTOWN Member+

    Oct 27, 1999
    Houston, TX
    Cue Moulin Rouge

    Spectacular Spectacular
     
  2. Nate505

    Nate505 Member

    Feb 10, 2002
    Colorado
    Have the Feds ever read the 'Peter Cries Wolf' story? It may be in their best interest to do so....
     
  3. angus_hooligan

    angus_hooligan New Member

    May 15, 2001
    Chicago
    Do you think that by them categorizing it as spectacular, that it will just be a really cool looking attack?
     
  4. Anthony

    Anthony Member+

    Chelsea
    United States
    Aug 20, 1999
    Chicago
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I guess. But then again they also read the Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga) statements in the Congressional Record.
     
  5. Nate505

    Nate505 Member

    Feb 10, 2002
    Colorado
    Talk about a big waste of time....
     
  6. metrocorazon

    metrocorazon Member

    May 14, 2000
    Oh boy! I cant wait for the BIG Dance number at the end!
     
  7. obie

    obie New Member

    Nov 18, 1998
    NY, NY
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I think the entire strum und drang of "we hear they may do something" is morbidly funny, but I also recognize that the Feds are in a no-win situation here. The public feels like the CIA & FBI screwed up on 9/11 by not heeding warnings and not telling people what they knew. So now they tell people what they know, and it's so vague that nobody knows what to do except sit around and be nervous. Give people not enough information and they berate you; too much information and they panic. (IMO this is function of the public not trusting their government, but that's another story entirely.)

    My only fear is that something terrible happens, and then the CIA comes out and says that their hands are clean this time because they "warned" us. I would hope that they're more professional than that.
     
  8. Ian McCracken

    Ian McCracken Member

    May 28, 1999
    USA
    Club:
    SS Lazio Roma
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    This was not a public warning, it was a confidential warning to law enforcement around the country. Some bozo leaked it out, which is exactly the reason why Ashcroft made public warnings in the past. Everybody has a friggin big mouth in this country.
     
  9. spejic

    spejic Cautionary example

    Mar 1, 1999
    San Rafael, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    It's better to get it out to the public. It doesn't make me nervous one bit, it gives the administration an out if a terrorist act actually takes place, and it even has a tiny chance of tripping would-be plotters and forcing them to rethink their plans. Secrecy does not help anyone.
     
  10. Dan Loney

    Dan Loney BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 10, 2000
    Cincilluminati
    Club:
    Los Angeles Sol
    Nat'l Team:
    Philippines
    It is not better to give generalized, vague warnings to the public. Amber Alerts are the kind of warnings you give to the public - ya know, with concrete information. Warnings like this just turn people into raving yip-merchants. "He's got a turban! GIT 'IM!"

    Here's how seriously the Army is taking the war, anyway:

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20021114/ap_on_re_us/gay_military_linguists_2

    When keeping a closeted military trumps everything else, I know someone isn't taking the threat seriously.
     
  11. Chicago1871

    Chicago1871 Member

    Apr 21, 2001
    Robin Williams, in his HBO show ealier this summer, had a bit about something like this.

    "Every few weeks John Ashcroft will come out and say, 'I don't know where, I don't know when, but something terrible's gonna happen.'"
     
  12. Ludahai

    Ludahai New Member

    Jun 22, 2001
    Taichung, Taiwan
    File this under the damned if you do, damned if you don't file. If they don't warn and something happens (regardless of how unclear the information is or unlikey the attack - i.e. 9/11), you get roundly criticized for knowing something and not telling the American people. You make warnings with the same indications (or more) than 9/11 and you get accussed of scaring the populace. You can't win.

    Remember Bali anyone? They are continuing to go after Western interests. Anyone who wouldn't keep their eyes open and take these warnings seriously is a fool.
     

Share This Page