Effects of Russian Invasion

Discussion in 'Referee' started by Sport Billy, Feb 24, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sport Billy

    Sport Billy Member+

    May 25, 2006
  2. Law5

    Law5 Member+

    Mar 24, 2005
    Beaverton OR
    Referees for UEFA or FIFA assignments are not 'sent' by their national association. They are assigned by UEFA or FIFA, depending on whose game it is. Cf. CONCACAF Gold Cup games are assigned by CONCACAF, not the host country, much less the referee's country.
     
  3. El Rayo Californiano

    Feb 3, 2014
    I watched Karasev referee Napoli vs Barcelona today. I wonder how many more international matches he’ll have this year.
     
    jarbitro and MassachusettsRef repped this.
  4. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd bet none. Ultimately, from a refereeing perspective, it seems like he and his crew are going to be the only ones affected by this--at least for the rest of this season--as other Russian crews probably reached the end of the line this week, anyway.

    The original premise here is off to me. First, UEFA is likely to ban Russian clubs from competition, right? At the very least, I think they'll make Spartak play away from home at a neutral site. Even if I'm wrong here, I don't know why there's some sudden fear of going to Moscow. Now, going to Kiev? That's obviously a different story. But there are no games scheduled for Ukraine, so that's not an issue.

    The big question is what FIFA does about Russia's WCQ. They could toss Russia. Or they could put that on neutral ground. I don't think they'll keep it in Russia because it sounds like Poland will simply refuse to play. So, if that game does go ahead elsewhere... I wonder who gets the honor of that assignment! Scotland v Ukraine also just got raised a few ticks on the "we need one of our biggest names" scale.

    As for Karasev... I think he's screwed. If the Russian football federation gets unilaterally sanctioned here, he's done. But even if they don't, where does he fit going forward on a big UCL match where he wouldn't become an issue for western clubs (or even governments?). He sort of slid in today on Napoli-Barca, because there was no time to react and there hasn't been an official response from UEFA. But, going forward? I just don't see it. You can't put him on a WCQ now, I don't think. As for UCL... maybe Ajax v Benfica, if he's not de facto eliminated from consideration? Other than that, I just don't see a match that UEFA could be comfortable putting him on. Too much attention or conflict for all the rest. And that would only grow with the QFs. Alternatively, I don't see the benefit of throwing him back into the UEL either, just to give him a game or two. The big question is whether or not his ticket to Qatar, which he worked so hard to earn, is now in jeopardy.
     
  5. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    MassachusettsRef repped this.
  6. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    mfw13, RefIADad, Mikael_Referee and 2 others repped this.
  7. RedStar91

    RedStar91 Member+

    Sep 7, 2011
    Club:
    FK Crvena Zvezda Beograd
    You were expecting full disqualification and full bans from Russian teams?

    Money talks and always has.

    Russia spit in the face of the integrity of the Olympics with doping and couldn't get their athletes banned (they just got their flag banned).

    What makes you think an invasion of another sovereign country would prompt a ban?

    If it's some country that doesn't really matter, then, yeah, they are dropping the hammer on them sporting wise.

    If Serbia decides to invade Kosovo tomorrow to try and regain it back, Partizan Red Star Belgrade are kicked out of Europe as fast as you can say Ukraine.

    This isn't little ol' Yugoslavia where you can kick them out of Euro 1992 and ban them from qualifying for the World Cup in '94 for engaging in a war of aggression on their own territory.
     
    frankieboylampard, Mi3ke and Pierre Head repped this.
  8. Sport Billy

    Sport Billy Member+

    May 25, 2006
    Which is the reason I started the thread.
    I don't expect FIFA to ban them from qualification.
    Hell, Qatar is as corrupt as can be and FIFA is keeping the world cup there.

    So, if as I expect, all of these games still happen, what should referees do?

    I think it should a personal safety decision and shouldn't hurt one's career if they refuse to go.
     
  9. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    I think it's a moot point, to be honest.

    There won't be any international games in either Russia or Ukraine until this is resolved, so no Referee will have to "refuse to go" as there will be nothing to refuse.

    The only question you may have is whether some Referee may choose to decline an appointment to a match involving a Russian team (on neutral territory, of course), but I think that would be unlikely.

    As for the Scotland v Ukraine game that MassRef mentioned (why would that need a "bigger name", btw?), I am hearing that within UEFA there are real doubts as to whether that will go ahead -the Ukrainian League has been suspended indefinitely, so as things stand they would have to play that vital WC Play-Off with more than half of their squad not having played for over a month. That would not be good.
     
    MassachusettsRef repped this.
  10. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    Actually, I just realised - the Ukrainian League was due to finish their regular 1-month winter shutdown this weekend, so in fact by the time that Play-Off comes around it will be over two months since most of their squad has played.
     
  11. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #11 MassachusettsRef, Feb 25, 2022
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2022
    My argument would be that if the Ukrainian national team actually plays that match in a month, the eyes of the world--not just the sports world--will be upon the event in a way they aren't even for the most high-profile WCQ. The human interest aspect around that match would be off the charts.

    Ultimately, we're talking very minor degrees of difference in referee selection, given the small group of officials UEFA would be choosing from. But, I think all things being equal, "who do we need for the Ukraine match?" just moved up a tick or two versus where it was a few weeks ago.
     
  12. Sport Billy

    Sport Billy Member+

    May 25, 2006
    Poland plays in Russia on March 24. Do you actually think FIFA has the balls to ban a second place in the group Russia?
    Do you think they will move it to a neutral location? Who would take it?
    Would say German allow Russia to play there given the increase in security that would be need for the game?
     
  13. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Probably not, but maybe.

    Yes. Considering Poland would refuse to play, they have to. You ask if they'll kick Russia out. The question being asked, to the extent it is at all relevant, is "would they kick Poland out?" Poland is not traveling to Russia to play a WCQ.

    Qatar or UAE. Or maybe Switzerland, if it has to stay in Europe. But I'd bet on Qatar or UAE.

    Germany isn't exactly neutral territory right now; it's a silly suggestion. I also am not sure what you envisage for "increase[d] security" given both the level of security typically afforded for a WCQ and the nature of this conflict, but that's almost certainly not a discussion worth exploring here. Bottom line is that unless FIFA acts in a draconian fashion (unlikely, but possible) this game will be played on neutral territory.

    Given what @allan_park has said, from an organizational standpoint the Scotland-Ukraine one might be far, far more interesting. Could FIFA DQ a country that is being occupied militariily because their players simply can't travel? If not, how do you re-organize things to have that match and the subsequent match five days later played? That's the nightmare. Ukraine, the geopolitical victim here, could also be the footballing victim, which would be (yet another) PR disaster for FIFA. Moving Russia-Poland, by comparison, should be a walk in the park.
     
  14. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    Personally, I would prefer that UEFA and FIFA suspended the Russian FA and all their clubs until this was resolved. I think that would be the "right" thing to do, but I don't think they have the courage to do so.

    But, if we assume that their games will go ahead on neutral territory, I don't see where a Referee appointed to that game would have a "safety decision" to make. He may not want to do it from a "moral" standpoint - and I would certainly understand that - but I don't think he would think he was in any "danger" by doing it. Why would he be?

    I believe that most of the guys who are in line to do these games feel pretty much the same as most of us - they are disgusted at the behaviour of Putin and would prefer to see their teams excluded for now - but I don't think many of them would decline an appointment if it was offered to them.
     
    JasonMa and MassachusettsRef repped this.
  15. Law5

    Law5 Member+

    Mar 24, 2005
    Beaverton OR
    I will add the observation that the CAF championship this year was held in a country that had a civil war going on! And I don't recall that there was any "cup truce' called.
     
  16. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    IASocFan and RefIADad repped this.
  17. RefIADad

    RefIADad Member+

    United States
    Aug 18, 2017
    Des Moines, IA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Unfortunately, I'd imagine FIFA will cave and basically call this a forfeit. It sucks, but the boycott only will really help Russia get closer to the World Cup.

    I'd love to think FIFA will finally grow a backbone on this, but if I did that I'd have to start looking for Bigfoot and Santa Claus on a more regular basis.
     
    dadman, mfw13 and JasonMa repped this.
  18. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    I think, for once, FIFA are going to "do the right thing" and expel Russia, though more because their hand has been forced.

    From what we are hearing, it is highly likely that Sweden and the Czechs - who are in the same bracket as Russia and Poland - will shortly also formally announce a refusal to play Russia. If that happens, I can't see how FIFA could do anything other than kick Russia out as otherwise they would have to throw Poland, Sweden and Czech Republic all out. In truth, I expect a number of UEFA National Associations to follow Poland's lead very soon.

    I do not like "politics" and soccer mixing, but in this instance I think Robert Lewandowski, captain of Poland, and one of the most respected figures in the game today, has put it better than anyone else I have heard: "Russian footballers and fans are not responsible for this, but we can't pretend that nothing is happening".

    Well done, Poland!
     
    tomek75, IASocFan, dadman and 5 others repped this.
  19. RefIADad

    RefIADad Member+

    United States
    Aug 18, 2017
    Des Moines, IA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I sincerely hope you are right. However, FIFA had years and pretty substantial evidence of the atrocities for Qatar in plenty of time to move the 2022 World Cup, and we all see how that went.

    I admit it-I’m incredibly cynical when it comes to FIFA and the International Olympic Committee when it comes to doing the right thing. I’ll believe it when I see it.
     
    mfw13 and Pittsburgh Ref repped this.
  20. Pittsburgh Ref

    Pittsburgh Ref Member+

    Oct 7, 2014
    da 'Burgh
    I share your cynicism, and yet I still retain a spark of optimisim that this time FIFA will do what football expects.
     
  21. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    I am equally cynical about FIFA and their motivations, but there is one critical difference here, and that is their hand being very firmly forced by Poland.

    FIFA's reaction was what we would expect of them - coming up with the "soft option" of making Russian teams play on neutral grounds - and by doing so, they kept the Russian FA and Sponsors "on side" while protecting their own interests But, the actions of Poland are going to force them down the path that they didn't want to take - that of having to expel Russia.

    To be clear, what options do they have if Poland stick by their stance, which I firmly believe they will? Frankly, they only have two options - the first is to expel Russia, and the tournament continues as planned; or, they view the Polish position as "forfeiting" the match, and award it to Russia. There is no third option, unless they somehow "stall" hoping for a swift, peaceful resolution which seems hardly likely.

    Now, I am sorry, and I know this might be viewed differently Stateside, but I can assure you, that expulsion of Poland will not happen. There is NO WAY. Sorry, I don't like to be so "black and white", but heck, there is NO WAY that would be accepted. The vast majority (all?) of the other nations in UEFA would never accept FIFA throwing out a fellow member nation for the "crime" of supporting" a neighbour who has been the victim of an unprovoked attack.

    Not a chance.
     
    roby, IASocFan, Pierre Head and 7 others repped this.
  22. Mi3ke

    Mi3ke Member

    Oct 18, 2011
    New Mexico
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    thoughts on the both team group photo from this morning, and on the[​IMG]
    Thoughts on the both team group photo from this morning, and on the ref team moving out of the way. Would the ref team face repercussions if one/all of them had included themselves in the picture as well?

    Cheers, Mi3ke
     
  23. allan_park

    allan_park Member

    May 15, 2000
    No.
     
    MassachusettsRef repped this.
  24. RefIADad

    RefIADad Member+

    United States
    Aug 18, 2017
    Des Moines, IA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    i saw a photo on the BBC site showing French referees helping hold a support banner before the PSG-St Etienne game. So I agree wholeheartedly that referees would not be sanctioned for being a part of something like this. I would imagine it’s a purely personal choice.
     
  25. faiyez

    faiyez Member

    Feb 16, 2010
    Costa Rica
    Club:
    LD Alajuelense
    Nat'l Team:
    Japan
    Poor Russia.

    If they had even a single superstar player that the football world would miss at the world cup, guaranteed that football fans would be seeing this much differently.
     

Share This Page