Why doesn't Landon draw more folks? Winning team now (for a while), the poster boy in the historic good soccer city....how much longer can folks blame a bad year in 2000? What's the electro-shock therapy there? Hard to believe SJ has turned into such a lame soccer market (on par with 2nd tier cities like Memphis)...
No... I believe it's the "build a soccer team around a young star in a city where everybody's unemployed" method that's not working...
Given that SJ has improved its attendance over the same time last year by over 3k/game, I'm not sure if that conclusion is warranted. I think a better conclusion is that MLS doesn't sell itself and if you want to transform your franchise from an attendance whipping boy to all-star you need real committment from a sales team like we saw in KC.
Very few soccer players in America can sell tickets all by themselves. Mia could for a while. Pele did. Luis Hernandez did for one match or so. Mattheus didn't. Based on the reactions of teenage girls when the 'Quakes were here May 10, I think some of that goes on with Landon, but I don't know how big the effect is.
even though they talk big i still think mls over all has thousands of miles to go in really marketing themselves to america by the way, i think they have come hundreds of miles in the past few years
Most people in SJ don't know they have a professional soccer team in SJ, even those who are into soccer. I recently talked to a guy in my amature league about the quakes. He said "oh yeah, we used to have a team called SJ earthquakes, but the league folded many years ago." (He was talking about NASL)
Will this finally put to rest the old argument against having American "stars" going off to play in Europe? That American fans will come in droves to watch them play here.
Why not look at the hard numbers? Average attendance after 3 home games 2001 9,645 2002 8,203 2003 11,135 Facts: 1) 2003 home opener drew more than the home openers in 2001 and 2002 2) 2003 second home game drew more than the second home game in 2001 and 2002 3) 2003 third home game drew more than the third home games in 2001 and 2002 I seeing nothing negative in the data. Perhaps expectations are out of whack with the reality of soccer in America? If every team could show this improvement (cough NE cough), the league would be sitting pretty. As for Landon, it is impossible to say what his overall affect is, but one can take heart that San Jose is the third highest road drawing team in MLS right now. Andy
Mia still does. It's true. Freedom road games still draw more than other games. While it's not as pronounced as 2001, Mia is still the biggest draw in the women's game.
I was at the Holland double header last spring but left before the Revs game started, so that does not count. Thinking back, it must have been the last game in the 2001 season. Had a tear in my eye leaving the old cement block. I had really grown to like it as a soccer venue. As you have probably noticed Tom in both the fort concerning diehards and the rest of the stadium for the core base audiance, I am not the only one to have given up on the Revs organization. Andy
Well, Miami and Tampa Bay were showing signficant improvement in attendance -- and sponsorship for TB -- when they were folded. So the 'sitting pretty' comment doesn't really make sense.
I said the entire league, not specific teams. If the entire league was up the same percentage that SJ is up, the league would be sitting pretty attendance wise, at least IMO. YMMV I guess in terms of how much you expect MLS to grow. Andy
It doesn't make it less lame or childish just because you may have company. I personally can't stand the spiteful boycott especially when the survival of MLS is at stake -- if there are mitigating circumstances like you are too busy or otherwise don't feel like going to games, then be honest, why make it about how you were somehow deliberately disrespected or mistreated? Before I get too carried away, maybe you are supporting the league in other ways like by buying the Shootout. But what does your boycott accomplish? From my limited experience, I've noticed that companies that are struggling or are somewhat dysfunctional often have customers and employees who develop an exaggerated sense of self-worth -- e.g., when I leave the company, everything is going to fall apart, or MLS really needs fans, so I'm very important and I should be treated accordingly. It seems to me that truly competent companies that do all the right things, make good choices and treat customers/employees great, etc., are the minority in this world.
You're right. It's just not as dramatic as 2001, when there was a serious effect. Outside that, there aren't many players that people will pay to see specifically.
It is not a boycott per say, its just I have no interest in an organization that does not care at all about soccer. Considering you don't have even the slightest clue of the amount of time I have volunteered over the years for the Revs, I will simply ignore the rest of your ignorant comments. And just to make you look like a total ass, would it help you to know that I am still a season ticket holder? Andy
Why is your goal to make me look like an ass? BTW - you are paying for season tickets but not going? Anyway, I guess I had misread other posts by you -- I was under the impression that you were boycotting games because of incompetence by the Kraft family. I'm happy to be wrong.
yes Because your post was full of terms that included "childish", "lame", "spiteful", "exaggerated sense of self-worth". My goal is not to make you look like an ass, posts like the one you made attacking me accomplish that quite nicely for you. Get rid of the term "boycotting" and replace it with "no longer interested", then replace the term "incompetence" with "disinterest" and this statement would be 100% correct. Andy
Sorry Andy - I was clearly off-base with those adjectives I used. Sorry for the tangent guys. Can any Quakes fans comment on guesstimates on where SJ draws their fans from? I'm just wondering what percent of fans come from Oakland/East Bay and SF.
Back on topic. When you look at the drawing effect of Landon, or someone like him, it's important to remember that the more signifcant draw could be in away markets(as indicated in the quote),where he only shows up once or twice a year, and the hosting team can promote his appearance to whatever extent they want to(we can call this the Hong effect). So even though the SJ front office may not be taking advantage of his drawing power, it doesn't mean that keeping Landon in the league to help attendance has failed.