They are likely one of those "non-profit" healthcare providers that pays doctors and executives $1 million plus.
In 2016 they had total revenue of $10.2 billion with a net income of $31 million. Executive compensation was $55 million (0.6% of revenue), wages and salary for employees was $4 billion (40% of revenue). https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/941196203
Probably. But perhaps that's better than those providers that pay twice those amounts and then pay the executives millions in stock options?
I got no issue with making cash, I just think it is funny how these healthcare "non-profits" are certainly quite profitable for the management/executives.
Non profits are tax exempt businesses because their mission is in the public’s interest (thus they’ve been granted tax exempt status). As a non profit they can’t distribute their earnings to owners like for profits can. Those surpluses go back into the organization to support their mission. There is nothing that says they can’t pay their employees (including their executives) fair market value for their services. They do have to justify the compensation they pay with compensation studies.
C-Level probably, but I would hazard a guess you’re getting that $5mil dividing $55mil by the 10 executive leadership profiles on their website. Just wanted to point out that the executive leadership is not the totality of their executive employees, there are likely hundreds of executive level employees. That said in 2013 the CEO was the highest paid CEO in healthcare in California. Presented without analysis, not stating or implying a position on the topic at hand.
Going forward this will be referred to as the LazyAssAss disclaimer. I forthwith declare that the LAA disclaimer is implied for all of my BS posts-- past, present and future.
https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2019/08/21/xfl-los-angeles-la-wildcats-football/ Another team will be playing in our stadium
Over and under on if they play an entire season and fold or not? I say under. That team is really annoying as they keep referencing their executive's experience with LAFC as a reason why they will be succesful. Never mind that this team is not entering into a market with a proven track record of supporting this level of American Football (unlike what the Galaxy did for Chivas 2.0) and also there aren't a lot of loser Chivas 1.0 fans lying around to pander to for this XFL team in the same way as new Chivas. I wonder if this "executive" is going to insist on calling the Wildcats "Carson"
I have no clue bc I am not big into american throw ball but Can LA handle Rams, Chargers, USC, UCLA and XFL?
My suspicion is that the person/group who starts up these alternative leagues are snake oil salesmen who end up making $ even after they inevitably fold. They just fleece their investors.
Stop us if this sounds familiar 🤦♂️ A beloved San Diego football team is considering Carson as a temporary home while their new stadium is built https://t.co/CQ9C1Z988g— FOX 5 San Diego (@fox5sandiego) May 19, 2020
Throw ball is silly. "Football" as a name comes from the fact that the game is played on foot, not by horse. And the earliest predecessors to "football" had no rules against handling the ball. In fact there were no rules at all--they were essentially a giant scrum played within an English town trying to get the ball from one side of town to the other.
The UPSL, a huge amateur league with two men’s divisions, will be holding it’s Premier Division national final four in the Los Angeles area during the second weekend of August. The semifinals will be played at LA Galaxy’s Dignity Health Sports Park Track Stadium on Friday, August 6. The UPSL Spring 2021 National Final will be two days later at Championship Soccer Stadium in Irvine.