Democratic Debate-Same As It Ever Was!

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by house18, Oct 27, 2003.

  1. house18

    house18 Member

    Jun 23, 2003
    St. Louis, MO
    Watched the debate on that obviously anti-truth network Fox and saw the same things that we always see when the Democrats get together...bashing. Yes they bashed Bush, they bashed each other, hell they probably wanted to bash themselves. Imagine a world where a Democrat said something productive, not just bashing. Hell, Al Sharpton even sounded intelligent amongst all of the typical negativity. Vey sad stuff. Now all you liberals be carefull not to get your panties in to big a bunch, because if you go back everything I said is true! MAke all you dumb arguments, bash me, bash Bush...and prove it again, fall in line!
  2. tcmahoney

    tcmahoney New Member

    Feb 14, 1999
    Truth about the Bush record is always negative.

    That's not my line -- it was said about GW the first by someone in the Clinton campaign -- but it's still devastatingly accurate.

    What I want to know is: Did Lieberman manage to avoid getting booed this time?
  3. superdave

    superdave Member+

    Jul 14, 1999
    VB, VA
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States was it different from the GOP debates in 2000? Except for whose ox was being gored, of course.
  4. riverplate

    riverplate Member+

    Jan 1, 2003
    Corona, Queens
    CA River Plate
    Best part concerned Kerry, who voted for the war but against the $87 billion financing of it, knocking Lieberman, who properly voted for both.

    Here's how the NY Times reported it:

    Mr. Kerry, in defending his vote after Mr. Lieberman questioned it, noted that he had served in Vietnam--and that Mr. Lieberman had not.

    "Well, Joe, I had seared in me an experience which you don't have, and that's the experience of being one of those troops on the front lines when the policy has gone wrong," he said. "And the way you best protect the troops is to guarantee that you put the troops in the safest, strongest position as fast as possible. Our troops are today more exposed, are in greater danger, because this president's been unwilling to share the burden and the task."

    Mr. Lieberman responded: "This is about the votes that he's cast that I believe are inconsistant. In fact, what do we look back and wonder about our time in Vietnam? We didn't support our troops. If everyone had voted the way John Kerry did, the money wouldn't have been there to support our troops."

    Mr. Kerry visibly stiffened at that.
  5. Dan Loney

    Dan Loney BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 10, 2000
    Los Angeles Sol
    Nat'l Team:
    I'm shocked at your lack of civility, fuckface.
  6. Matrim55

    Matrim55 Member+

    Aug 14, 2000
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    You can't quote Bush verbatim. If you do, it's called "mudslinging".

Share This Page