David beckham injures ankle again.

Geez! You think you're buying a BMW and when you get it home, it turns out to be smokin' 75 Pinto with a slipping clutch and bald tires.

 

I don't believe it for a second. 'Tis a rouse to get around the fact that Yallop doesn't want to mess with the Galaxy's winning mojo by re-inserting Becks into the lineup. A rouse, I tell ya!

 

WTF this a joke I love Beckham but man now I think he's trying to milk MLS while not playing.

 

The stars align.

[Result]Freddy Adu is cap-tied to USA...
USA wins on European soil...
England lose to Russia on plastic pitch[/Result]...
David Beckham injured foreverer.

It all makes sense, right?

 

Thanks. Sincerely. I was going to watch that later and have stayed away from any sites or links to international soccer.

 

Fixed.

 

Ha Ha that's what you get for cruising around a soccer message board. I never get sick of someone crying about finding out a game result in a soccer message board.

 

Clearly this is all fixed to help the Galaxy, right? This must be some big conspiracy. . .

 

Wasn't crying, but thanks for your concern. Damn, I wish they would somehow segregate these boards so that US National team news might be somewhere else.

I take back every nice thing I said about Qwest.

Seattle, go ******** yourself.

 

Will he be recuperating his ankle on a beach with his family?

 

WOW are u serious? this is like his 10th injury in the season

 

Just talked to the Galaxy offices...

Beckham did NOT reinjure his knee. He did NOT leave practice early. He will be available tomorrow night.

 

Wow, that article doesn't actually say ANYTHING that FlaGreekGuy claimed.

Is deliberate hoaxing a valid reason to red card?

 

Oddly, the headline on my Yahoo home page does say "Beckham aggravates injured left ankle..."

But yes, the article says nothing of the sort.

 

Seriously stay off the internet and especially out of Big Soccer if you don't want a result. The [R] is about as effective as the pull out method.

 

It wasn't his knee.....supposedly it's his ankle again.

Anyways, the AP content of the AP article has changed. They removed any inference that the ankle was agravated.

 

Weird false alarm..

the Latimes did say his ankle was bugging him a little bit at the end of practice. Not sure what the AP was going on about.

 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/10/17/sports/s152129D75.DTL

Same updated article, with footnote:

Looks like AP got some bogus info earlier.

 

You're being a dick.

Where are you from...let's see, oh yes....Seattle.

I'm shocked.

 

Maybe but it's still the truth.

 

let's be reasonable... his line:

is about as perfect as you can get in regards to the [r] rule

it's not meant for people in the real world


the [r] rule is for people in narnia, lord of the rings, star wars and world of warcraft

 

Then again, the rules of the website say otherwise about being able to visit a thread about an entirely different subject without an (r) in the title and being able to expect to not hear about the result of a match that has no relevance to the thread what-so-ever.

Maybe it's just me, but I think that person should feel safe clicking on this thread and not hearing the USA result from a midday game that finished only hours earlier.