http://web.mlsnet.com/sights/goal_of_the_week/ Montero's goal was a beauty though. This also puts him in a tie for golden boot.
yes, it will be a Montero slaughter this week. I still voted for Cunny, but I have to ask where is the first goal? I thought his first goal was more impressive.. he turns and one touches a side volley into the goal.
Either Seattle fans got complacent and didn't vote or everyone else is tired of their ballot stuffing too. Much like week 1, the wrong goal won, but congrats to Jeff anyway - he should have had it in some of the previous weeks.
And in Week 1, Kenny Cooper should've won Goal of the Week. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrJPYCIZTvo"]YouTube - Kenny Cooper Golazo[/ame] Sometimes the person you think should've won, doesn't win. I guess you'll just have to live with it the way we had to back then.
no problem at all. We here at the FCD forums are fair... we will wholeheartedly admit that if there was a sexual harassment of the week award, that Montero would win by a landslide.
Cunningham is up for GotW again this week. If you haven't voted, get over there and do so. Voting ends at 1 pm. http://web.mlsnet.com/sights/goal_of_the_week/
Even if you HAVE already voted, get over there and do it again. As often as you like until 1pm. Donovan had a huge lead over everyone just yesterday - when I voted the first time. As of two minutes ago, Cunningham has drawn even (both @ 30% of the vote) and Landin is right behind (29%). Donovan winning would be one thing, but we can't let Landin win this, can we?
I see that the Houscum is now ahead so go vote for JC9. http://web.mlsnet.com/sights/goal_of_the_week/
He wins again!! I just tried voting multiple times, but saw that 1PM had just passed, so my votes didn't count, and while I was voting, Landin lead Cunny by 2%. When I refreshed my screen I saw Cunningham had won, even though when I voted it showed Landin with more votes. Last week, I voted Wed morning, and Cunningham was trailing by 12%. I have a feeling they may be limiting voting to 1 vote per day per IP, but don't have that limit on the percentages that show. Several times now someone has won when nearly the deadline they were trailing by quite a bit... I think maybe mutliple voting alters what we see on the website as results, but behind the scenes they have a way of filtering multiple-votes. Something is definitely strange, anyone have other thoughts on how this works?
It looks like it's more per MAC Address. So even if you are sharing an IP for example at work, each machine gets a vote. And no use trying to clear your cookies either LOL
Cunny is up again... can he make it 3 in a row? Ferreira is up too, but I'd rather throw a 3-peat into the faces of all the ballot stuffers in Seattle and Toronto.