Columbus Crew owner Anthony Precourt is set to move team to Austin, Texas, in 2019 if downtown stadium can't happen in Columbus. Story soon. Grant Wahl Columbus Crew owner Anthony Precourt is set to move team to Austin, Texas, in 2019 if downtown stadium can't happen in Columbus. Story soon.— Subscribe to GrantWahl.com (@GrantWahl) October 17, 2017
Precourt has had reps travel to Austin looking at potential stadium sites, meeting city/business leaders, etc. Been in the works for a while— Brian Straus (@BrianStraus) October 17, 2017
I hate this kind of stuff and I hate that the sports watching public at large accepts it. I don't believe it should be part and parcel with sports in this country. At the very least, if they do move, leave all the history and name in Columbus.
Especially when it doesn't seem too likely that the franchise is bleeding money out anything like that...
This is a reason I increasingly hate the American system. Relocation and the threat there in. My Kings saw the owners try to move the team to Seattle, Anaheim and Vegas. Was a miracle they stayed. Supersonics fans weren't so lucky. But now the Raiders are in fact leaving, my NFL team. Now the NFL is dead to me. I despise owners moving a team.
A team using relocation as the bargaining chip to gain a new stadium? MLS is now officially a major league in the U.S.
Hopefully the story will answer these questions, but... 1. What exactly does he want from the City of Columbus? If he wants money to build the stadium, I think he has overestimated the Crew's importance. If it is working on getting the land and the Crew would pay for everything, then maybe this would work. 2. Where on Earth would they play in Austin? UT's stadium?
Here's a more fully fleshed out story: http://www.dispatch.com/sports/20171016/crew-sc-owner-considering-moving-team-to-austin-texas
I always figured that once expansion was done, there would be a spat of franchise moves. Has to figure Columbus was going to be under threat to be enticed away by a bigger market, especially one that losses out in the expansion lottery. The surprise is that it’s now and that it’s Austin. I’m a little familiar with Columbus and thought there was an intriguing idea about bringing the team downtown. I don’t know what the roadblocks were. Assuming this is brinksmanship - is there a chance of a deal happening?
All we need now is for a really good Crew team to win MLS Cup in Columbus. This is some shitty stuff.
Uh-oh: “it also included an escape clause in the case Precourt wanted to move it to Austin.” And for the conspiracy theorists among us: “Cincinnati’s case would be stronger if the Crew were no longer in-state.”
And, "A consortium of Columbus businessmen have been trying to work with Precourt to find a local solution. They have scouted locations for a potential Downtown stadium and made offers to purchase all or part of the franchise. Precourt has demurred. Putting it all together, it really sounds like Austin was the goal all along. Plus, Precourt sits on the Expansion Committee at MLS, so he's probably working for Cincinnati to get in after he hightails out of Ohio.
Columbus + Cincinnati + Nashville is the problem. I don't see how you get around that issue. That's too many teams in that region. Cincy & Nashville have monster ownership groups and $150+ million stadiums in the works. Hard to see Columbus winning this battle.
Wahl's story is up: https://www.si.com/soccer/2017/10/16/columbus-crew-austin-texas-anthony-precourt-stadium
Columbus has one of my favorite crests and color schemes in the league, so I would hate to see it go. As someone mentioned, I hope the brand identity stays in Columbus in case a potential future owner wants to resurrect it in some form. I understand the future upside that makes Austin (along with Vegas) the "hot" expansion/relocation market in sports at the moment, but I also feel this is MLS' chance to position itself as the league that won't rip teams out of their cities. Other than Wimbledon FC, clubs aren't supposed to relocate--they are supposed to be so entrenched in their cities and communities that they live and die in them. As insufferable as the pro/rel zealots can be, this is definitely one of the drawbacks of the North American franchise model that irks me to no end.
Complete and utter garbage. I forgave the initial contraction because it was essentially clubs going out of business. I forgave the next relocation because in the end the Quakes revived themselves. And finally I forgave the Chivas contraction because it essentially amounts to a replacement by LAFC. But relocating the Crew for stadium politics would end my interest in this league. There would have to be something dire for me to be OK with a contraction ... bankruptcy, attendance collapse, city disappearing in a asteroid hit or something like that. If it's just a case of an owner that doesn't want franchise anymore, the league needs to buy it and keep it in business for a number of years to give time for new potential ownership groups to come in. If you want Austin, sell Columbus to the league first and then go in the back of the expansion line, just like everyone else.
Poor Columbus, this kills San Antonio's bid as well. Maybe that's why no info has been coming out of SA if this move has been in the works for a while.