CNN Forgot to Hide Their Liberal Bias - Website Calls Bush "A--hole"

So should the 'fundies' not be upset by those liberals who try to shove left-lying beliefs down their throats? Look at 'popular' television. Gays, lesbians, free flowing sex are all prevalent. But you don't see that as shoving it down our throats? The ratings are falling, so you can take your moral-less life and shove it up your...

 

We've got tv's over here in California that allow the user to change channels, as well as a cool invention to turn the crazy thing on or off. When is that technology supposed to hit the Red states?

 

What with the economy doing so well, he'll be fine.

 

In the immortal words of MiamiAce "Very well said."

Once again we're hitting that "moral" wall, the place where things like blatant lies somehow aren't included in "morals", and young Americans dying in the name of those lies add up to less than a pair of cut-off blue jeans.

 

any kid up at 6am on anything other than christmas morning deserves everything they get - they are not normal.

I've no idea what a daisy duke is, but thinking girls are "too young to be wearing that" is one of those signs of ageing.

how do you exploit free speech? Speech is free or it isn't. If you are going to impose limits on it then it stops becoming free speech. I don't know what he said and I don't care because generally when anyone has to shout and get angry to win an argument, then they din't have much of a case in the first place, but unless he said anything that was actually untrue, what's wrong with what he said?

They were neck & neck in the polls for months. Not much sign of any 'lash' in either direction. If anything tipped the balance it might well have been Osama's 'carelessly' timed latest tape. Funny that. It's almost as if he wanted Bush to win and carry on his fine job of winning the hearts and minds of muslims in Iraq and beyond.

 

God, I hope not. I'd have to replace my whole wardrobe.

But I wouldn't put it past him. Anybody here read the Handmaid's Tale? Maybe it's time to invest in burqa manufacturers.

 

Maybe you should contact the tv repair shop and let them know your on off switch and channel selector aren't working properly.

 

If you're going to ban Howard Stern for assassinating Bush, we have to ban Rush Limbaugh for assassinating Clinton. There's a statute of limitiations for presidential assassination.

What are your thoughts about lesbian porn?

 

I think the outlawing of 'Daisy Dukes' is immenent. It is also an important use of our tax dollars, unlike body armor for men going to Iraq. Speaking of Iraq, I noticed that even though the mission has been accomplished, we are still instilling a lot of democracy over there. God Bless. In the net, etc.

 

I think the burqa business is where the smart money is moving!!

 

So i guess drunk driving (bush), phone sex adultery with your empolyees (o'reilly), and illegal drug usage (limbaugh) are all moral? Aren't these people the leaders of your moral revolution? good role models... maybe i'll become a conservative republican. they sound so.... moral.

 

Good point. You convinced me, I'm voting for Kerry!

 

No one shoves anything down anyone's throat on television. There's this really cool invention called a remote... it has a bunch of numbers on it, as well as buttons that allow you to navigate between channels. In a split second, you can rid your TV of liberal scum and turn on the 700 Club or NASCAR. Use it.

 

Exactly! There are plenty of conservative and "Fair and Balanced" media outlets and leaders out there. Both have there pros and cons and all are biased one way or another. Listen to Rush. If you disagree with him you are a liberal idiot. How is that not biased media?

 

MiamiAce, don't go over the causeway to SOBE

 

Just giving you some grief. I lived there for the last 6 years before moving back to Texas and know all about the culture and lifestyles.

I have always wondered what the detraction about gay marriage is. In essence, marriage is a contract between two people, which, when recognized by the state, gives the privledges you mentioned above. Is it the religious side of it that gets to people? I am married and if two men or women were to tell me they were married, all it really means to me is that they love each other enough to enter into a longterm binding relationship and want to spend the rest of their lives together. Would it be better to change to term to "union" or something else?

This will continue to be a big debate over the years.

 

Awfully nice of you not to "cheat" gays and lesbians. I'm sure your kindness and honesty is universally admired.

Study some anthropology. Hell, just google the phrase "kinship structures," and you'll see that this is total ahistorical, ethnocentric blindness.

I thought you said it wasn't a religious issue. Indeed, you did:

You're very, very confused. You should take note of the number of cultures historically wherein polygamy was practiced, and justified on religious grounds. You can start by reading the Book of Genesis. Then, if you can grasp the idea that "marriage" is historically and culturally conditioned, you might be able to come up with a better argument for your cause, instead of one that just rationalizes -- and renders sacred -- a fear of gays of lesbians.

 

There are many heterosexual couples that do or never plan on having kids. Do they not qualify for marriage if it is a crucial part of marriage?

If two men or women live together and love each other are given the label "Married", will society and civilization come to a complete stop?

Again, procreation shoudl not be a guideline for a binding commitment. Should infertile men or women be barred from marriage?

In my opinion, the denial of rights and privledges to a group of people because of the sexuality (which is a personal choice) is as wrong as denying the same to people of differing religions, beliefs etc.

 

Getting back on topic. Do you notice how CNN's website is not placing the drop in oil prices prominently. I wonder why?