According to the Chicago Rush - Rush Report, the Rush is the winninest team (according to regular season winning percentages over the last four years) - Here's the breakdown Rush - .583% FIRE - .548% Sox - .514% Cubs - .512% Bears - .463% Hawks - .434% Bulls - .271% I can't say whether these are right or not, but I'm guessing they took some time to figure them out. I'm guessing the Wolves were left out because they would have a higher percentage, all I could find online was since 1997 the Wolves are .629%. I also think they put regular season, because the FIRE would pull ahead considering the playoffs. If anyone is really feeling like diving into the numbers, I wonder how it breaks down when adjusted for number of games played
How does one go about computing win percentage with the possibility of ties? Is it a straight wins/all games or is it points/all points possible?
Isn't it an oxymoron to call it Chicago's winningest teams?? Just kidding. The Wolves should have been put on there. In the 10+ years they have been around, how many Cups have they won? I know they won the IHL at least twice and the AHL once. I would also like to see how the Sting and Blitz would stack up from the years they were around. Also, does anyone have a ranking for most league championships? I am guessing the Bears would be #1 with the Bulls, the Sting, the Fire etc...
Arena Ball has actually been around for quite a while now. They play in the spring and are on NBC. The AFL is indoor football along the lines of what indoor soccer is to the outdoor game. Kurt Warner is one the AFL's success stories.