It would be nice if Milley and co would call a press conference to say these things direct to the public instead of talking to the Atlantic and Bob Woodward
Actually, I am hoping that will happen. Hopefully, the campaign is coordinating something in that regard. I think Milley may be much more open to that than the likes of Mitt, Kelly or Mathis.
NYTimes has an interesting article on the role Musk has been playing in getting Trump elected. From spending tens of millions via his SuperPAC on voter outreach, to using the heightened outreach that Twitter's algorithm gives his account to push pro-Trump narratives, to outright censoring of tweets that include negative information about Trump. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/us/politics/elon-musk-donald-trump-pennsylvania.html
One of the days this week she was on a lot of different pods/shows. And it was, apparently, mostly recycled stuff about herself and her positions. From a political reporter stuff, what she said was nothing special. But it was noted that she is making a strong effort to go after lower information voters who don't pay attention to politics, and don't know her. In particular, it was noted that her being on Whose Your Daddy pod was strange as they focus mostly on entertainment, but that is also made sense in that it is almost entirely an U45 audience, majority female audience, and super majority U35 audience. It was an appearance to reach out to the people on the margins. And this is in contrast to what Trump is doing. He (and Vance) is also going on some non-typical pods, but the audiences for those pods are almost exclusively White heterosexual males. Harris is going after everybody else, and even trying to move some White heterosexual males to her side of the of the arena. I think this is a good strategy as well.
And it’s hard to believe any poll with Fabrizio’s name on it is non-partisan, as he is the Trump campaign’s internal pollster. Not to mention Emerson may not be a partisan pollster, but their results have leaned right since at least 2020.
I understand the concerns about GOP aligned polls and how they should be taken with a grain of salt, having said that the tightening of the race is a cause for concern.
This is a very interesting data point: 1844922804187128047 is not a valid tweet id I also read a post from an organizer saying Dems in Florida are getting envelopes with cash from republican women. Encouraging if true.
Somewhat related, I think. Was listening to some pod today, and they were discussing mail-in ballots. One of the reporters was saying that he spoke with possible (likely?) Harris-voting Republican women who didn't want to vote by mail, least they have their vote seen by people in the home.
Maybe there are more voters that we can get than we thought we could. And maybe the Florida dems are not so useless.
Given the global warming issue with Florida I've got a question. If Florida because of global warming is reduced to let's say 50% of it's current size, but people move away to other states in such numbers, the state is reduced to let's suppose 1/3 of it's current population....does that have any effect on Florida's contribution to the senate etc. or the voting for the president?
Senate, no. Every state gets 2 senators regardless of population. Presidential voting, yes. The number of electoral votes a state gets is equal to its number of members of Congress (2 senators + however many representatives), and representatives are allocated by state based on the census, which is taken every 10 years. Each state gets about 1 representative per 760,000 residents right now. Florida currently has 28 representatives, so it gets 30 electoral votes. If the population were a third of what it currently is, they'd get about 10 representatives using the current rep to population ratio, so they would have 12 electoral votes.
Not sure about that. 20% for Other is rather high. What is the current count in the Scott v. Mucarsel-Powell race?
Big deal. He got his speech in. He got his soundbytes out on MAGA-oriented media, AND it’s in California, where he wasn’t going to win anyway. So what if those people don’t vote for him now?
David Plouffe was on with Pfeiffer today if you want some super anorak analysis. Plouffe is a senior advisor on the Harris campaign so i presume the point of him doing this was strategy for dem operatives and keep volunteers focussed.