Holy smoke....this ************************ is even more vile than I thought....Irony is truly dead. Sen. J.D. Vance was interviewed on CNN by Dana Bash: BASH: Do you believe Kamala Harris is Black? VANCE: I believe Kamala Harris is whatever she says she is, but I believe, importantly, that President Trump is right that she’s a chameleon.
Bash was - as per usual - pathetic in that interview. let him spout his nonsense with barely any pushback. example: she asked about the catladies comment and allowed him to get away with "it was a quip" -- but she didn't follow it with "But your policy is that people with no kids get less of a vote, isn't it?" and this was after he repeated his crap about Walz's service record with "It was either he mis-spoke or a lie" and she let that slide too! christ she's useless.
The problem, which is not really obvious from Nate's comment, is that this is an attack on Harris. A Black and Indian woman leading in the polls and drawing big numbers, and he says she is a generic candidate. The dismissal of what she is doing - yes, what is doing - is shitty.
Yeah - the advantage "generic dem" has always had is they only need to turn out Biden's 2020 coalition to win. Like you, I think any of the next gen candidates would be leading because that anti-trump coalition is still out there. I do wonder how much of the magic of this campaign was the pent up worry about the Biden campaign finally finding a positive place
Probably but we have convinced the stat nerds that their opinion matters so now that he didn't get his wish of a primary, he is gonna dismiss her.
You have a one track mind What he is saying is that at this time in '20, Biden was up 8 points (worked out to be 4+ in November). That anti-Trump coalition of voters is still there, so logically a competent Dem candidate should be ahead so long as they turn out the exact same people - they don't need one voter more. We already know KH has made up lots of ground with those voters where Biden was struggling. Especially young and black voters, less so hispanic. He is not attacking KH. For instance if Newsom were the candidate, he might turn out to lack competence, or the public might not like him. None of these people apart from KH had much national profile, and even she is not well defined. All in all, its hard to unpick how much is KH magic / honeymoon / wave, and how much is just dems coming home now they finally have a candidate who they can rally behind. I suspect a bit of both.
This whole "generic" thing is so ********ing stupid....We have seen this canard over and over and it needs to be retired from serious discussion now. People do not vote on "generic" candidates.
Seriously mate, you can't be that obtuse. I can post articles and comments from the very same Nate Cohn where he is doing exactly that. FFS, he was advocating an "open convention" since she was "polling worse" than Biden and was obviously a bad candidate, according to the newly minted pundit, Nate Cohn. According to Nate, it was a mistake by Biden to endorse her. Why anyone would listen to anything he says is still a mystery to me. Both Nates are not serious people. Their rapid fall from decent data-based journalists to mediocre, bitter and asinine male pundits has been truly remarkable.
I didn't. And the poll, data, and media people don't get just how weird the Republican Party has become. And how much that, along with Dobbs is an anchor around them. And with Trump choosing JD Vance, well I doubt people are going to vote for him with bells on. Reluctantly voting for Biden? I get that. Lot of people may have been concerned about Biden's age, but they would've voted for him. The other thing people miss, is that Trump wasn't doing well in the primaries. That Nikki Haley was still getting a good chunk of votes even when she quit should be telling. For all the people going on about uncommitted harming Biden (Which didn't do a thing), it was sound and fury signifying nothing. Anyway, most of it, barring the weird and Dobbs, doesn't matter anymore. Biden stepped out, things are looking optimistic. I don't care what data people say because well, they tend to be a tad fanatical about it (And you know what Le Carre says about fanatics). And if the 2012 American League MVP debate taught me anything, data people tend to value data over everything else, including common sense.
We also have some boring options out there, there are a few Democrats that could do as well as Harris and most would have suffered if we would have had a bloody nomination process.
But is it true? Nate was right on calling for Biden to step away, he was saying way before most of us here accepted that. He was wrong for saying giving it to Harris was a mistake, he was thinking that 2020 Harris would make similar mistakes and fvck it up, but so far 2024 Harris>>>>2020 Harris. Nate was also wrong IMO on understimating how damaging an open convention would have been and he also understimated Harris ability to unify the party under her.
Biden dropping out changed the election from a referendum on Biden to one on Trump. The whole Republicans are weird moments most likely doesn't happen if Biden was still our candidate.
BTW vibes are changing, would this have happened under Biden as candidate? I doubt it. The undecided are finally deciding that the economy may not be as bad as they thought. NEW In a new Financial Times poll, Vice-President Kamala Harris is now leading former President Trump by one point on who voters trust more with the economy. This same poll, conducted last month when President Biden was still in the race, showed Biden trailing Trump. Since… pic.twitter.com/cn4N9IY9fs— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) August 11, 2024
Same. Getting the entire Democratic Party in line in 2 days was a really impressive start to what has been an impressive campaign effort.
I've come to believe that many people's primary motivation, from NYT staff to BS posters, is to prove how smart and prescient they are.
donny is pissing his pants These are not conspiratorial rantings from the deepest recesses of the internet. The author could have the nuclear codes and be responsible for decisions that will affect us all for decades. pic.twitter.com/zdmJ2fh7I6— David Plouffe (@davidplouffe) August 11, 2024
Despite the calls for an "open convention" from the Ezra Klein, Nate Cohn and even some rather brainless democrats, Biden did the right thing by endorsing Harris right away. That had a lot to do with getting the Party in line and the unity around her.
carolinaforward.org/… A new poll in North Carolina shows Vice President Harris tied at 46% with Donald Trump and shows Democrat Josh Stein leading Mark Robinson 46% to 36% in the race for governor of the Tarheel State. The survey has 2% of voters supporting Robert Kennedy, Jr., and the rest undecided or favoring other candidates.
You mean like other people in this thread, self included? You can get your point across without being a dick about it. Wanting a more open process was a valid opinion - even Obama felt that way too, and I don't think any Democrat would consider him brainless. It has worked out for Harris and the Democrats, but that outcome was in no way clear when Biden dropped out.