Candidates for 2027 WWC

Discussion in 'Women's World Cup' started by Lechus7, Oct 19, 2020.

Tags:
  1. r0adrunner

    r0adrunner Member+

    Jun 4, 2011
    London, UK
    Club:
    AS Roma
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    I also cannot think of a reason generally speaking why FIFA would not want to award a WC to England.
     
  2. PJ234

    PJ234 Member

    DC united
    United States
    Oct 17, 2021
    How about Turkey? They have a lot of stadiums in the 20,000s and 30,000s?
     
  3. NaBUru38

    NaBUru38 Member+

    Mar 8, 2016
    Las Canteras, Uruguay
    Club:
    Club Nacional de Football
    My argument is that the English Football Association is bad at gathering support among UEFA members, let alone elsewhere.

    Certainly...

    Certainly.
     
  4. M

    M Member+

    Feb 18, 2000
    Via Ventisette
    Biggest problem for England bids used to be hooliganism by England fans at major competitions. Convincing UEFA to support your bid when England fans were behaving badly abroad was a hard sell. That problem seems to have disappeared in the last 15 years or so. But during that time period we had the corruption of the '18 and '22 World Cup bids. Also, it's actually tougher for European bids to succeed as there's more competition in UEFA for hosting major tournaments. Look at CONCACAF, for example, where the US hosts (or in '26 is the major host) for every Gold Cup and for the '94 and '26 World Cups.

    I actually think England would be a perfect fit for a Women's World Cup.
     
    toad455, r0adrunner and blissett repped this.
  5. toad455

    toad455 Member+

    Nov 28, 2005
    We just had a joint co-host with the 2023 WWC. The men's WC, essentially, has to be a joint co-host due to them having 48 teams now. Is the WWC now more likely to be a duel hosting event from now on?
     
  6. almango

    almango Member+

    Sydney FC
    Australia
    Nov 29, 2004
    Bulli, Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    The infrastructure demands for a WWC are less than a MWC. There may be more joint bids, but there are still a lot of nations who could host on their own if they desired.
     
    blissett and PJ234 repped this.
  7. SiberianThunderT

    Sep 21, 2008
    DC
    Club:
    Saint Louis Athletica
    Nat'l Team:
    Spain
    More likely? Yeah, would make sense, just because it's more teams; but that doesn't mean it's going to be likely in general. Only one of the 32-team MWCs was ever co-hosted, and FIFA has very specifically passed over any other joint bids since then until they expanded to 48 teams.
     
    M, toad455 and blissett repped this.
  8. Lohmann

    Lohmann Member+

    Arminia Bielefeld
    Germany
    Feb 24, 2020
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    Duisburg is out because they can't guarantee that the roof renovation of their stadium is finished by December 2026 as demanded by FIFA.
     
  9. Cheetah101

    Cheetah101 Member

    Apr 21, 2009
    Arizona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I was watching a couple of 2010 clips on youtube and it got me to wondering if the vuvuzela might be a knock against South Africa hosting?

    Will they be required to ban them from stadiums in order to host again?
     
  10. NaBUru38

    NaBUru38 Member+

    Mar 8, 2016
    Las Canteras, Uruguay
    Club:
    Club Nacional de Football
    I thought that the vuvuzelas were charming, at least as a couch potato.

    The organizers intentionally put pre-recorded vuvuzelas on stadium loudspeakers. I know that some journalists hated them but whatever.

    It's all about the money.
     
  11. Lohmann

    Lohmann Member+

    Arminia Bielefeld
    Germany
    Feb 24, 2020
    Nat'l Team:
    Germany
    Gelsenkirchen replace Duisburg.
     
  12. toad455

    toad455 Member+

    Nov 28, 2005
    South Africa moves bid to 2031 WWC.

     
    blissett and PJ234 repped this.
  13. shlj

    shlj Member+

    Apr 16, 2007
    London
    Club:
    FC Nantes
    Nat'l Team:
    France
    There is a Dutch report that suggest USA/Mexico might withdraw ...
     
    blissett, toad455 and PJ234 repped this.
  14. PJ234

    PJ234 Member

    DC united
    United States
    Oct 17, 2021
    Not surprised tbh. USA just has so many events being hosted. For me personally I would like to see it in Brazil.
     
    Cheetah101 repped this.
  15. toad455

    toad455 Member+

    Nov 28, 2005
    I figured their dods were slim since they're hosting the men's World Cup the year prior. Don't think FIFA would have approved that.
     
    PJ234 repped this.
  16. lil_one

    lil_one Member+

    Nov 26, 2013
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It doesn't look like it:

     
  17. toad455

    toad455 Member+

    Nov 28, 2005
  18. shlj

    shlj Member+

    Apr 16, 2007
    London
    Club:
    FC Nantes
    Nat'l Team:
    France
    FIFA announced there are three official bids as expected:

    Brasil; Belgium, Germany, Netherlands; Mexico, USA. bids data are available on their website.
     
    PJ234, toad455 and blissett repped this.
  19. Lechus7

    Lechus7 Member+

    Aug 31, 2011
    Wroclaw
    toad455 and blissett repped this.
  20. toad455

    toad455 Member+

    Nov 28, 2005
    Still dumbfounding that the men's World Cup host(s) get named 6+ years in advance and the women's World Cup host(s) get 3 years notice. The 2034 men's World Cup host has already been named(Saudi Arabia).
     
  21. SiberianThunderT

    Sep 21, 2008
    DC
    Club:
    Saint Louis Athletica
    Nat'l Team:
    Spain
    To be fair, while FIFA already let this cycle slip a while ago, the next cycle is gonna get that 6+ years advance planning. It's not like they could go back in time at this point to fix this cycle.
     

Share This Page