Bush's FCC: Your Butt is a "Sexual Organ"

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by MasterShake29, Jan 27, 2008.

  1. MasterShake29

    MasterShake29 Member+

    Oct 28, 2001
    Jersey City, NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Listen, all you women that have resisting the backdoor sex because it's unnatural or some other lame excuse, it's time to give that up.

    Because your butt is indeed a sexual organ. Don't take my word for it, just ask the FCC:



    Thanks Nancy Pelosi for not impeaching these idiots.
     
  2. Demosthenes

    Demosthenes Member+

    May 12, 2003
    Berkeley, CA
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Sounds like ABC was in violation, whatever your proclivities.
     
  3. Cascarino's Pizzeria

    Apr 29, 2001
    New Jersey, USA
    IIRC NYPD Blue (ok, trying hard not to puke) showed Frantz's azz one time. That should be a fine for bad taste, right?
     
  4. wallacegrommit

    Sep 19, 2005
    An ultimate irony, considering the apparent topic of the episode.
     
  5. YankHibee

    YankHibee Member+

    Mar 28, 2005
    indianapolis
    This is why it is great that the new generation is being raised on ATM. ATM, DP, BDSM, TP, BBW, these are all great examples of things that happen in a healthy, unrepressed society.
     
  6. PhillyQuakesFan

    PhillyQuakesFan New Member

    Jun 25, 2007
    Delaware County, PA
    Club:
    Philadelphia Union
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    Because of this?? Seriously???
     
  7. MasterShake29

    MasterShake29 Member+

    Oct 28, 2001
    Jersey City, NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    No.

    But because Nancy Pelosi made a political calculation to give George W. Bush a pass, stuff like this happens.
     
  8. Barbara

    Barbara BigSoccer Supporter

    Apr 29, 2000
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I was really hoping that someone else would respond to this but I guess I'll have to give it a shot. This really is not my favorite subject. Here goes.

    We don't poop from our buttocks. We don't need our buttocks to poop. Unless the person whose buttocks were shown on ABC was bent over, spreading said buttocks for a lovely view of the netherest of her nether regions, you can't say that excretory organs were exposed, therefore you can't say that ABC necessarily violated anything. Except me, for having to type this post.
     
  9. argentine soccer fan

    Staff Member

    Jan 18, 2001
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Club:
    CA Boca Juniors
    Nat'l Team:
    Argentina
    Of course we need our buttocks to poop. Otherwise we would fall into the toilet.
     
  10. Barbara

    Barbara BigSoccer Supporter

    Apr 29, 2000
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Doh! Silly me!
     
  11. YankHibee

    YankHibee Member+

    Mar 28, 2005
    indianapolis
    If we didn't have butts, couldn't we just stand up and coach the Browns to the Superbowl? Be sorta like a horse, no?
     
  12. HerthaBerwyn

    HerthaBerwyn Member+

    May 24, 2003
    Chicago
    Given what comes out of it, how can five networks show Bush's mouth for two hours tonight?
     
  13. wallacegrommit

    Sep 19, 2005
    Not true. Almost every show with people exposes excretory organs. Skin is the largest excretory organ of the human body.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excretion#Other
     
  14. IntheNet

    IntheNet New Member

    Nov 5, 2002
    Northern Virginia
    Club:
    Blackburn Rovers FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    We're getting a break for two hours from all five networks showing Obama's mouth 24/7...
     
  15. Claymore

    Claymore Member

    Jul 9, 2000
    Montgomery Vlg, MD
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    "....rage, rage against the dying of the [black] light!"
     
  16. Matt in the Hat

    Matt in the Hat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 21, 2002
    Brooklyn
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    You are all hypocrites. You all want the FCC to have content regulation power but get all pissy when they actually assert it.
     
  17. HerthaBerwyn

    HerthaBerwyn Member+

    May 24, 2003
    Chicago
    Wouldnt it be nice if the free market types had the courage of their convictions, even when it made them squicky?
     
  18. wallacegrommit

    Sep 19, 2005
    I want the police to have the power to arrest criminals, but I get pissy when they beat up innocent people.
     
  19. Matt in the Hat

    Matt in the Hat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 21, 2002
    Brooklyn
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    To make your comparison even remotely relevant you have to assume that the cops get to decide what behavior is considered criminal.

    The FCC should only regulate bandwidth and other technical matters. They need to get out of the speech police business.
     
  20. Kobranzilla

    Kobranzilla Member

    Sep 6, 2001
    NY F'in City
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    was this a joke?
     
  21. wallacegrommit

    Sep 19, 2005
    People speed all the time right in front of cops and don't get pulled over.

    The FCC enforces statutes, they don't have plenary power to make up the rules. A cop is enforcing a criminal statute, too. A cop can exercise discretion and so can the FCC.
     
  22. Matt in the Hat

    Matt in the Hat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 21, 2002
    Brooklyn
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Obviously they can't. They need their content regulation power stripped from them.
     
  23. Barbara

    Barbara BigSoccer Supporter

    Apr 29, 2000
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I only get pissy when they are unreasonable. I consider this unreasonable - especially the size of the fine.
     
  24. Matt in the Hat

    Matt in the Hat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 21, 2002
    Brooklyn
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    But I'm sure if the fairness doctrine, designed to limit political speech from the right, was put back into place you would consider that reasonable, right.

    And this is the big problem. It is the consumer that should be the arbitor of what is decent and indecent. What's reasonable and unreasonable. It should not be the federal government with their warped concepts of what is good and what is fair and what is tasteful.

    I mean there is still a 1st amendment, right?
     
  25. JBigjake

    JBigjake Member+

    Nov 16, 2003

Share This Page