'Bushisms' make university's banned list

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by Mel Brennan, Jan 23, 2003.

  1. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    Overused cliches, wordy redundancies and hyperbolic phrases -- including "make no mistake about it" from President Bush -- were declared banished Wednesday by the university overseers of an annual list of banned words...

    more at
    http://asia.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/01/01/banned.bushisms.reut/

    Also, in celebration of my country continuing general efforts toward all things opprobrious:

    Don't "misunderestimate" Dubya. Those verbal Bushisms are beginning to "resignate" with the American people. Maybe they'll even "embetter" the English language.

    They may have started out as verbal slip-ups but several of President George W. Bush's mangled phrases found their way on Tuesday to a list of the top words of 2002.


    more at
    http://www.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/01/15/offbeat.bushisms.reut/index.html
     
  2. cossack

    cossack Member

    Loons
    United States
    Mar 5, 2001
    Minneapolis
    Club:
    Minnesota United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Fine by me.

    I was more concerned when Berkeley (freakin' Berkeley) was censoring the use of Emma Goldman in peace pamphlets.
     
  3. spejic

    spejic Cautionary example

    Mar 1, 1999
    San Rafael, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Make no mistake about it, this is a must-see list. Now more than ever, CNN has proven it got game. Having said that, I am going to read it again... TO THE EXTREME!
     
  4. monop_poly

    monop_poly Member

    May 17, 2002
    Chicago
    From CNN Report:

    'But the most frequently used word on the planet, whatever the native language, is still "OK." '

    I wonder how they verify this?
     
  5. Ludahai

    Ludahai New Member

    Jun 22, 2001
    Taichung, Taiwan
    What, CNN needs to verify something?
     
  6. Ian McCracken

    Ian McCracken Member

    May 28, 1999
    USA
    Club:
    SS Lazio Roma
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    Why am I not surprised that university officials want to ban speech?
     
  7. GringoTex

    GringoTex Member

    Aug 22, 2001
    1301 miles de Texas
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Bolivia
    Probably because "OK" is used in English and Spanish.
     
  8. Garcia

    Garcia Member

    Dec 14, 1999
    Castro Castro
    Probably because Oklahoma is OK!
     
  9. Ludahai

    Ludahai New Member

    Jun 22, 2001
    Taichung, Taiwan
    Maybe they came to China and saw "OK" on signs all over the place. They just didn't know that with the two characters that come before it, it means "Karaoke".
     
  10. The Hunter

    The Hunter New Member

    Jun 24, 2002
    Stuttgart
    Personally, I find censorship of any kind to be offensive. Of course college campuses are hotbeds of censorship so why should we be surprised?

    Bush's speech patterns are a good representation of the way the media and advertisers have cliche-ized the language and a great many ignorant Americans these days tend to speak this way. So basically, he is representative of the people. Just as Clinton's moral foibles made Americans feel it was OK to screw around, Bush lets people know its OK to speak like a 10th grader.

    We Americans get the President we deserve. Why hide it?
     
  11. Godot22

    Godot22 New Member

    Jul 20, 1999
    Waukegan
    **snort**

    Before we really start sounding off on how horrible censorship is, let's, you know, read the article.

    It's a group of college administrators at a tiny, ice-cold Michigan state school releasing a list of the most tiresome cliches of the year as part of an annual tradition.

    Not censorship. Nothing is banned. Please unjerk your knees now.
     
  12. Scotty

    Scotty Member+

    Dec 15, 1999
    Toscana
    Hear me now and believe me later.
     
  13. Mel Brennan

    Mel Brennan AN INTERVIDUAL

    Apr 8, 2002
    Club:
    Paris Saint Germain FC
    Indeed, one typical test of who READS around here...yes, both articles were meant to submit the sadness of the fact that our President's stupidity is becoming "institutionalized," NOT that there was any real censorship issue.

    ...which you'd know if you read.
     

Share This Page