Brazil vs Germany - Confed. Cup semifinals [R]

Discussion in 'Brazil' started by RealMadrid14, Jun 23, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nicephoras

    nicephoras A very stable genius

    Fucklechester Rangers
    Jul 22, 2001
    Eastern Seaboard of Yo! Semite
    That dive against Chelsea was a bit more than that. Carvalho did not illegal while marking Ballack, whereas Ballack fell backwards so fast it appeared that he had just suffered a terrible case of whiplash.
     
  2. extranjero

    extranjero New Member

    May 28, 2004
    I seem to remember that Carvalho shortly held Ballack's shirt. Not for long and not nearly strong enough to fall down but replays showed that there was illegal contact. Perhaps your tv program didn't show such replays?

    Anyway, after the game Ballack stated that it was a clear penalty which I found surprising and may reflect that he really felt disadvantaged by Carvallho's pulling. Ballack is not really known to make outrageous claims after games, and in fact he has acknowledged "that other referees might decide otherwise" or some such in other questionable situations.
     
  3. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    I am sorry ... but I saw absolutely no contact from Emerson.
     
  4. extranjero

    extranjero New Member

    May 28, 2004
    It seemed to me as if Emerson's hand slightly touched Ballack's back. Probably not in a foulworthy way but it was contact of a sort. There also seemed to have been slight contact of their feet as shown by replays. The later was difficult to see without to have the right camera angle.
     
  5. Camisa5

    Camisa5 New Member

    Mar 28, 2004
    Why are Germany playing in RED?
     
  6. Ombak

    Ombak Moderator
    Staff Member

    Flamengo
    Apr 19, 1999
    Irvine, CA
    Club:
    Flamengo Rio Janeiro
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    To promote their new third jersey. ie to sell more.
     
  7. nicephoras

    nicephoras A very stable genius

    Fucklechester Rangers
    Jul 22, 2001
    Eastern Seaboard of Yo! Semite
    Oh, I saw them. But he was holding Ballack before the ball was in the air, to keep Ballack near him (and Ballack was doing the same).
    If that is a penalty, then ANY contact in the penalty area is a penalty.

    Ballack can say whatever he wants, but that was never a penalty.
     
  8. extranjero

    extranjero New Member

    May 28, 2004
    I don't recall that Ballack was actually holding too but I wouldn't exclude it. This sort of thing is all too common. Anyway, whenever a defender holds a player in the penalty area he theoretically gives the referree an excuse to call a foul. Ballack's dive against Chelsea didn't simulate the holding itself but only its force.

    I think Ballack may have rationalized that by being held back by Carvalho he was in fact robbed of the chance to get away from Carvalho to reach the ball before him.

    But, heh, I don't believe it deserved a penalty too. Otherwise we would've at least a dozen penalties in every match.
     
  9. levfanatic

    levfanatic New Member

    Jul 2, 2004
    Cologne, Germany
    No, that red one is actually the new German away-jersey. It replaced the black away-jersey last fall after Klinsmann took office. No promotion necessary as there is no third jersey.

    The black one, by the way, was introduced in 2003 to replace the traditional green kit. Good decision, I think. Never liked that green one.

    Cheers
     
  10. Sempre

    Sempre ****************** Member+

    Mar 4, 2005
    NYC
    Club:
    AS Roma
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    Ballack is a stud. Did anyone see him pointing Lehman in the right
    direction on Ronaldhino's pk? That was class. Lehman followed his
    cue, too, but it wasn't to be . . .

    By the way, Gary Bloom on FSC said that the penalty was for Roque's
    shirt-pulling on Huth? You all are saying it was for Emerson on Ballack;
    which is the official call?
     
  11. DutchCane

    DutchCane Member+

    Apr 6, 2004
    New York, New York
    TP,

    It's interesting that not too many folks realize that the Defensive starts with the Midfield.

    I thought Roque played great in the 2nd half. Imvho if he progresses on this level he will be solid. He's just a whipping boy, can't win for losing. Robinho played with some real intelligence against the Germans. Kaka and Ronaldinho look tired. Why not play Renato and Juninho in their stead?
     
  12. XaviandXabi

    XaviandXabi Member

    May 4, 2005
    CT
    it was Emerson pulling Ballack, i remember the commentor sayng that was what the ref said at HT or something
     
  13. Camisa5

    Camisa5 New Member

    Mar 28, 2004
    Ballack is a ........... (I had better not swear). Stay on your feet you Son of Klinsmann.
     
  14. afa10fef

    afa10fef Member

    Aug 13, 2004
    Toronto
    Club:
    Toronto FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    LOL
     
  15. Redshift

    Redshift Member+

    Dec 14, 2004
    Los Angeles, CA
    Club:
    Corinthians Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    tpmazembe,

    I know you mentioned previously that you didn't want to continue rehashing the whole debate about Roque, but yours was one of the few thoughtful discussions I've read on the matter -- so here goes:

    I agree with your basic premise that Brasil's strategy and playing style puts an inordinate amount of pressure on the CBs and that even defenders of Puyol, or Nesta's ilk might not be able to deal with the ensuing defensive problems significantly better than Brasil's current defensive lineup. Like you said, playing attacking football entails tradeoffs and it is incredibly unfair to blame one person for the consequences of these tradeoffs. Likewise, I don't believe that Roque lacks skill or is without his merits--far from it. For instance, he had a magnificent WC final, where he dealt with everything that was thrown
    at him, or if one prefers a more a more recent example, one could take the "milimetric" pass that led to Brasil's second goal in the Confed. Cup semifinal as proof of his footballing acumen. All of this is erased and forgotten with the latest stupid goof (where we are sure our grandmother could have done better) or puerile and unnecessary foul leads to a penalty.

    No. These are not the reasons I think Roque should be replaced.

    There is no simple answer to the Selecao’s defensive woes--but a better “saida de bola” would go a long way. This is not a new problem, either. If one examines the matches where the critical link between the defense and midfield was put under pressure, one will find precisely the games where Brasil had the largest problems. I think the team needs a CB with more tranquility and greater ability to pass the ball, or run with it if necessary. I think Juan fits the bill (I’m sure you got a chance to see the Brasil-Mexico game in the Copa America last year) but there are other options, like Edmilson. Furthermore, I am not of the opinion that it’s a strictly defensive issue. The current Brasil side lacks a true center midfielder—someone with a wide range of passing options at his disposal, vision to distribute ball, play incisive through passes, defend when necessary and generally make the ball run rather than run with the ball--a Falcao or Gerson. I think that Alex most closely fits this requirement (though Ricardinho could also do it to a lesser extent)—he would add a lot more dimension to the Brasilian offense than Kaka, whom I like but think should not be a starter. You could stick two DMs behind the pair of Ronaldinho and Alex, one to play a role like Gilberto Silva fulfilled in the WC and another capable of either defending or attacking (like Kleberson or Renato):

    ==============Dida=================
    ==================================
    ========CB==========CB============
    ==================================
    RB===========================LB====
    ==================DM==============
    =========DM=======================
    ==================================
    ======================Alex=========
    =========Ronaldinho=================
    ==================================
    ======Ronaldo=====Adriano============

    Or maybe Robinho in Adriano's place comming more from behind.
     
  16. Cool Rob

    Cool Rob Member

    Sep 26, 2002
    Chicago USA
    Club:
    Flamengo Rio Janeiro
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    This is probably the best post I've ever read on any site. Good job. My main concern is defense on set pieces, a problem which is to some extent a separate problem from the Quarteto system.
     
  17. Redshift

    Redshift Member+

    Dec 14, 2004
    Los Angeles, CA
    Club:
    Corinthians Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    It's a shame that Alex was injured before the cup... I wonder if we will ever get to see him on the pitch with Ronaldinho.
     
  18. MIGkiller

    MIGkiller Member+

    Flamengo
    Brazil
    May 9, 2003
    Rio de Janeiro
    Club:
    Flamengo Rio Janeiro
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    I think this thread has already run its course; we should be discussing the Bra vs Arg game of today. Any other general Confed. Cup discussion should be continued on the main Confed. Cup thread of this forum.
     

Share This Page