It's not a question of him losing his job at this point. It's going to be whether he decides to step down or not
Bob got the USA to the Round of 16; did what was expected. On another note, I don't think I had ever seem him so animated on the sidelines before.
This is non factor at this point. Lets celebrate our win and not think of this negative BS. Go f*ck yourself
We know what you did. All we have to do is look at the other garbage you posted to know what you're all about. You're the same jackass who said he hoped the USA would go three and out to get rid of Bradley. This thread doesn't make you a troll. You're a troll because of persistent infringement.
Is he really worse than Globalusation? I don't know, maybe a draw...(I'd like to see them both "die in a fire" )
Maybe a better way to phrase the question: Does Bradley stay or does the ghost of Bruce Arena's second term necessatate a change, even with the great tenure of results? Always been a Bradley fan, but this is something that needs to be seriously thought about. My personal view, Bradley should be given a contract extension (if he takes it or not is another matter) not so much because of the results as the fact that the team seems to be working as a unit, firing on all cylinders, and whatever other sports cliches you want to use, and I don't want to mess with a good thing. Under Bradley the whole has been greater than the sum of the parts. That said, I can understand why, after the drop-off in Arena's second cycle, people would be hesitant about keeping a coach for eight years straight.