Black liberals need to respond to insult of Rice by Baraka

If I knew what a "skeeza" was, I'd probably enthusiastically agree with the term. Rice is incompetent and should have been fired on 9/12/01.

 

Baraka was an amazing film.

 

He shouldn't have called her a skeeza. That was wrong. He should apologize.*


* This should serve as definitive proof that I am not part of the Black radical Left (whatever that is).


I can think of several things she should be called that are more appropriate, however.

 

How about "Bucky"?

He should apologize to save his own credibility, not that he had any to begin with.

 

Bucky and Token are totally inappopriate (Bucky seems downright offensive and to his credit, Bush has a pretty good record of minority appointments).


Nit-wit implies stupid, which she's not. I would go for Incompetent.

 

Why should anyone bother? Is Baraka suddenly relevant again?

Probably, Baraka is hoping that black leaders condemn him because it gives him more press and makes him look "edgy". GOPers don't run out to condemn every two-bit thing that Jerry Falwell or David Duke says, which in the general scheme of things is probably better because it keeps their profiles as low as possible.

 

Jews need to respond to the insult of Cleavon Little by Brooks.

 

You're right, that's why I edited my post, but you were too quick for me.

My joking aside, I don't feel she's as big a dissapointment when compared to others in this administration.

 

Aw, are conservative feelings so easily hurt? Let me eat a bran muffin so I can give a ************.

 

In the third category there are people on the right who engage in personal attacks and believe everything they hear on talk radio.

 

Yes.

 

You really shouldn't.

And, I'd let Loney off from apologizing for calling conservatives names if he'd apologize for his "columns" first.

 

Let's pretend for a moment that this idiotic distinction of yours has any validity.

Let's also pretend that someone is dumb enough to click on your name, and masochistic enough to search on "all posts by this user." What's the over/under on how soon they find an exception to this "second category"?

And what's the over/under on how quickly you make a personal attack on someone outside of this category, now that you've said you never do it? I'm going to go with six hours.

In the first category are people on the Right who are woefully misinformed, incapable of expressing a coherent opinion, and basically about as miserable a passel of snakes, lemmings and paramecia that you would find in a month of Sundays. There is no second category.

 

I would, but since my readership has dwindled down to one blithering ultra-conservative in Southern California, there's really no point.

 

Hey! I resent that.

I call you names, too.

Asshat.

 

The all popular "Link me to [insert thread here] so I can come up with something witty in the meantime."

 

Oh I forgot. We're not supposed to think for ourselves in this time of crisis.

 

But you didn't SAY liberal, did you? You said three particular posters.

Squirrel molestor.