ITN reports that United have had several bids and his future is uncertain (seemed that his future at United was looking uncertain!). Also said he will not be with United at the start of next season. He better be at United at the start of next seaon or I have lost my £5 bet. The rumours keep coming, and United dont seem to be doing much about them. You would expect them to listen to offers, but you would hope both parties could sort, what will become a mess if they dont sort it out before the start of the season. Do you think SAF has had enough of Becks lifestyle? He doesnt take any prisoners, look at Stam or the disbanding of the 94 side. Although I dont think he would be our biggest loss, I dont want to sell our best players to our European rivals. We dont have to sell, but its the Bosman rule, if they dont agree a new contract. Do you think its convenient for both parties, that if he leaves they can blame the other? SAF may want rid. United say Becks not discussing a new contract so have to sell to avoid a Bosman. United have reportedly said Becks will not start discussions on a new contract, his last contract took over a year to agree. Becks I want to stay but United wanted to sell for the cash? The club will be ok after Beckham, as it was before. Stars come stars go. Becks offers crosses, passess and free kicks, as well as 100% effort. It seem a shame to lose him, so all parties get a grip, and keep Becks. Out of interest in terms of senior players I rate Scholes and Giggs more important. Giggs because he is capable of turning a game. He seems to have lost his way a lately.
yea, if beckham moves i think that will def be a huge loss. but giggs losing his way a bit? no. he doesn't have the flair he had a few years ago, but this was one of his best seasons and best of all he had almost no injury problems. if beckham does leave, i hope he plays for manchester united in the usa tour and not for barcelona. lol
Becks would be a loss. But if it serves to bring in a player like Rolandihno or Gattuso, I'm all for it.