His intentions are not well meaning unless one is looking at things from a Mason's point of view. He is just a more polished version of Bergoglio. Kyrie Eleison
“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us.” - St. Anthony the Great
Before he was elected, Pope Leo’s brothers on Twitter or X had conservative view points I don’t know if they still post or not though. Ratzinger was also very strict and that’s why he resigned. Bergoglio on the other hand, went against many of the church teachings. I think that’s why they went with Leo to find an in between the other two.
Zio Falvo, con tutto il rispetto Bergoglio was a wolf in wolf's clothing, Prevost is a wolf with a much better tailor. Chicago has been one of the most important hubs for evil the last century or so. Saul Alinsky had disturbing ties to Montini (Pope Paul VI), Montini made Bernardin a cardinal, Obama (non-catholic) states that he was profoundly influenced by Cdl. Bernardin, and Leo (Prevost) claims that he draws much inspiration from Bernadin. Chicago is a cesspool. You mention Prevost's brothers. One of them said right after the conclave that he expects his brother will be just like Francis. Prevost basically affirmed his brother's assumptions with his first words to the world as Pope. And contrary to anyone with eyes to see and the teachings of the Church (which he is entrusted to uphold, protect and promote) he unofficially beatified Bergoglio within the first week or two of being in the Chair by saying something along the lines of "I could feel Francis from Heaven...". Bergoglio was an unrepentant public sinner (and he was not Catholic). Per Church teaching, it would be an error to presume he went straight toe Heaven. Personnel is policy. He still has Smoocho Fernandez and all the other den of creeps in their positions and continues to elevate more of them and bring more on. He is a friend and a promoter of those that openly partake and promote alternative lifestyles. The Masons have turned the Vatican into a cesspool as well. Please pray for his conversion. I suggest (at minimum) reading the "Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita" to understand how and why the Church does not look like it did the first 1900+ years of her existence.
This kirk thing is far bigger than when the democrats tried to kill Donald. We are winning the culture war against the scum
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOl829iAaQQ/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ== Finally a Canadian I could buy a beer for.
These lazy ********ers finally reconvened to Parliament. Charlie Kirk mentioned. I would have liked to have seen a wide angle shot to see if everybody stood and applauded. This profile belongs to a Bot cosplaying as an Ottawa Senators fan (blechhh) and Canadian. I don't know from which country, likely India. This is well known over here. Anyhow, posting it mainly for the topic not to give this bot notoriety. BREAKING: Conservative MP Rachael Thomas pays tribute to Charlie Kirk and DEFENDS the right to freedom of speech and expression.Even the Liberals stood up and gave Rachael a standing ovation. Wow. pic.twitter.com/ZzrLpTIiSB— Jinglai He 🇨🇦 (@JinglaiHe) September 15, 2025
I'm calling BS on this one. They are saying the Pride Parade in Southern Manitoba canceled for this coming Saturday due to threats from the Right -- NO WAY. About a month ago the Pride Parade in Ottawa was cut short. Why? Because Pro Palastine Protesters intersected with them (the Left eating the Left). Just learning now that the same thing happened in Toronto 2 years ago. Conservatives have NEVER interrupted Pride Parades here. No way. Now they are doing so in Manitoba of all places? Checking now there was another Parade elsewhere canceled due to pro hamas protesters and yet another canceled due to infighting in the organization's leadership. HAVE YET TO SEE A SINGLE TIME CANCELED DUE TO CONSERVATIVES. But they will have you believe its happened now. I smell a false flag.
Another disgusting vile pedophile. That first reply in the comments section... watched that video a day ago. Those are some astronomical odds. George Zinn, the elderly man first detained after the Charlie Kirk shooting, confessed to possessing child pornography on his phone, with FBI charges now filed against him. He admitted he instinctively acted as a distraction to give the real shooter a chance to escape.… pic.twitter.com/kOKvUZZeku— AF Post (@AFpost) September 16, 2025
OK Charlie Kirk assasın suspect Tyler Robinson's texts with roommate, from charging document pic.twitter.com/7VO9EhDP4k— TaraBull (@TaraBull) September 16, 2025
Trump should tweet that. Pin it at the top of his page. He should tweet more...every tweet gets like 50 million hits.lol Instead he posts on truth
Both sides are wrong though. Have to be fair here. 1) Kimmel and many on the Left are trying desperately to paint Tyler Robinson as MAGA. His parents certainly are but he is NOT. Even Chris Hayes on MSNBC, to his credit, stated today that Robinson is not on the Right. 2) However, this was after Trump's appointed FCC Head threatened to pull ABC affiliate broadcaster licenses if they didn't cancel Jimmy Kimmel. The thought police have arrived and this is not good even of you support Trump.
Hhhh, it is all coming to what I have been saying all along. You can have Stalin, Khan, Hitler, but in the end, the only thing that can really damage the world in the long run, are Americans. It's the best country in the world, right? Or as the unfortunate man, Kirk, would have said, the only country that people criticise but still do not want to leave, which fact, according to the deceased, proved that it was the best country in the world. Because, of course, in other stupid countries there are no people staying there in spite of bad politics due to family, feeling, or home, because those countries are NOT the best countries in the world.
Not sure why Kimmel and the Left insist Robinson was on the Right. This is more hope than anything else.
So on Reddit it is one big echo chamber… I try posting logical questions so people could think for themselves like “if a child is born to a “racist” family does that automatically make the child a “racist” or can the child develop his own opinion and say “those views are wrong” and not be a racist… all I get from people is I’m wrong he is a maga and to cry harder.