Bad Idea: Business & Media forum split

Discussion in 'Customer Service' started by AndyMead, Jan 31, 2003.

  1. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Please recombine the Business & Media. The non-soccer business thread is a bad idea. It's the "Business and Media" forum, not the "Soccer Business and Soccer Media" forum.

    At least that's what I thought.
     
  2. monster

    monster Member

    Oct 19, 1999
    Hanover, PA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, it was my idea, so you are contradicting your previous statement about me. ;)

    But seriously, this isn't etched in stone in my mind. This came out of brainstorming to try and re-work things since "Links & Articles" kind of outlived its purpose after the World Cup, in our opinion.

    The forum is busy. The forum is diverse. And the forum is, in my opinion, a dumping ground for any and everything that people want to talk about. Maybe this is a way to split things up. Maybe not. Apparently Jesse thinks it's worth a try. So let's see how it works out.
     
  3. tcmahoney

    tcmahoney New Member

    Feb 14, 1999
    Metronatural
    Andy, as you and Andy B have pointed out, it's valuable and interesting to take a look at how other leagues run their business and compare and contrast to MLS, WUSA and the A-League.

    But some of the stuff honestly wanders a little far afield sometimes -- like USASoccer's WNBA threads, or someone mentioning promotion and relegation in connection with an American non-soccer league.

    At first, the sentiment was to simply pack anything non-soccer related off to Other Sports. But instead, what we've done is we've kept the non-soccer business threads in B&M, but given them a separate forum, keeping the main B&M forum focused on soccer-related business and media.

    Like monster said, nothing's etched in stone here. This isn't like making a bad player trade. If this doesn't work out, we can always combine the two again and go forward from there. But let's see how this works out, though.

    BTW, I think we can all agree that "Links and Articles" has outlived its usefulness until the next World Cup, though.
     
  4. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Then moderate heavier. I had no compunction about moving fluff/crap threads to FFA, MLS, or other fora.

    Threads about domestic sports league business is what the forum was all about. What lessons can soccer learn. How does soccer compare. Etc... Like it or not, the WNBA, Title IX, and XFL are germaine to the discussion of soccer sports business in the United States.

    I guess my main problem threads were the - I saw this article (well it was in the media). Your biggest problem seems to be the soccer basher threads. I would just move those, without links, to FFA.

    There have been multiple attempts to split B&M for years, and this is, in my opinion, the worst attempt of them all.
     
  5. Rocket

    Rocket Member

    Aug 29, 1999
    Chicago
    Club:
    Everton FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'd like to see just one B&M forum. But if you all are set on breaking it up, why not make "Media", and not "Non-Soccer Business", the subforum within the B&M forum?

    Like Andy Mead, I think most people who're interested in soccer league business are interested in the business of other sports' leagues as well. So it seems natural to keep all of that discussion in one forum.

    Media is a rather specialized branch of the business side and has its own devoted band of followers. Folks who're very knowledgeble and/or interested in the subject like monster and kenntomasch would regularly visit a media forum no matter where it was located so that they could argue Nielsen numbers and cable vs. satellite. On the other hand, I think the number of BS members who're very interested in non-soccer business on its own is somewhat limited.

    I have no doubt media discussion could survive in its own forum. Threads placed in a non-soccer business forum, on the other hand, are apt to be viewed by just a few, IMHO.
     
  6. Godot22

    Godot22 New Member

    Jul 20, 1999
    Waukegan
    I agree with AndyMead.

    A writer suggesting relegation for the NFL is primarily a puff piece that belongs in Other Sports. An article describing the WNBA's transition from Single Entity to a more conventional ownership structure is of immediate significance to MLS fans.

    And I would argue that the Links and Articles forum became irrelevant when falcon6 got a yellow card, but hey, that's just me.

    If any split of B+M needs to happen, I'd argue for a "Media Activism" forum to be spun off for "Write A Letter To This Guy's Editor," "Stuff The Ballot Box Of This Internet Poll," "SportsCenter Doesn't Respect Soccer" threads and their ilk.
     
  7. BhoysFC1995

    BhoysFC1995 New Member

    Nov 30, 1999
    NYC
    i agree with that statement.
     
  8. dark knight

    dark knight Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Dec 15, 1999
    Club:
    Leicester City FC
    I've said it before, but I think the split should be B&M Lite, or some similar name, and should approximate the splits of the US and MLS boards where the non-N&A forums are a little less serious. Jim Rome, Ty & Jack threads, and "Gilmore Girls just mentioned soccer!" threads could be sent there.
     
  9. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078

    sounds good to me
     
  10. Labdarugo

    Labdarugo Member

    Dec 3, 2000
    Downwind
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Sounds like it just may have been split the wrong way. Why not somthing like this?
    • Soccer and other sports business
    • Soccer in the media
     
  11. AndyMead

    AndyMead Homo Sapien

    Nov 2, 1999
    Seat 12A
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    There are two absolutes in BigSoccer B&M forum.

    1. Everyone thinks it should be split up.
    2. Nobody can figure out how to do it.

    Hey, I was in the trenches. I've been involved in the discussions. The signal to noise ratio is still among the highest on BigSoccer even with the repetitive crap threads.
     
  12. Bill Archer

    Bill Archer BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 19, 2002
    Washington, NC
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm tempted to create a sockpuppet to write this post, because I've got a reputation to maintain around here,

    BUT

    Andy Mead is entirely correct here. When there was just one forum, and it was moderated appropriately, it worked a lot better than it does now.

    It is one of only a couple Forums which need this treatment, but in this case ruthless moderation was the key.

    (And also being up front about it; Andy never made any bones about how the moderation was heavy, entirely subjective and continuous. How the hell else could it have survivied the Oliver Tse wars, among other things?)

    Let's go back.
     
  13. Andy_B

    Andy_B Member+

    Feb 2, 1999
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    As one of the original moderators of the B&M board, I always welcomed diverse posting about other sports.

    The change is less interesting to me and as such I rarely bother to read, much less post in that board.

    I would combine the board back into one.

    Create two official threads:
    1) Soccer Bashers
    2) US Soccer announcers

    Anyone who posts that crap outside of those threads gets moved or deleted.

    Moving the non soccer business has done nothing but dramatically lower the signal to noise ratio of one of the few safe havens left on BS.

    Andy
     
  14. Huss

    Huss Member

    Aug 1, 1995
    New York, NY
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Given Andy's history and relationship with the site and our users, we have executed his recommendation.
     
  15. monster

    monster Member

    Oct 19, 1999
    Hanover, PA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I said I was up to any solution so I'll see if this works. I don't see what didn't work in the last change so I'm kind of flummoxed.

    Outside of comments from maybe four people here, I got no feedback. And since there were almost no threads on non-soccer business anywhere in the last two weeks, I don't think there's an issue. The problem before wasnon-soccer business threads trumping soccer business threads.

    Given the latest change, can we sticky those threads? Otherwise, if they fall down, people will start their own threads, creating more confusion if someone doesn't get to it right away.
     
  16. Jeff

    Jeff Member

    Apr 14, 1999
    Alexandria, NOVA
    The Non-Soccer Business threads likely appeared to be "hidden in the back office" to many. That may have influenced traffic.

    Personally, I like Andy_B's idea. How other sports run the business side of their leagues indirectly is soccer related in many cases. Often useful to use what one league and/or franchise does as a benchmark for what soccer can do (promotions). Also, new sports ventures can make a market more crowded, which can be an extra hurdle for soccer to overcome. I'll stop here.
     
  17. monster

    monster Member

    Oct 19, 1999
    Hanover, PA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Took nine minutes for a troll to appear. Who had that in the pool?
     
  18. monster

    monster Member

    Oct 19, 1999
    Hanover, PA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Bad etiquette quoting myself, but the score is

    Three posts, all three by trolls.
     
  19. Dan Loney

    Dan Loney BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 10, 2000
    Cincilluminati
    Club:
    Los Angeles Sol
    Nat'l Team:
    Philippines
    Now WAIT a minute here.

    When did "Gilmore Girls" mention soccer?
     
  20. dark knight

    dark knight Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Dec 15, 1999
    Club:
    Leicester City FC
    It might help to tweak the title - like Official Whine about Jim Rome, et. al. thread. Okay maybe not that exactly, but you get the idea.
     
  21. monster

    monster Member

    Oct 19, 1999
    Hanover, PA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I have always thought any thread or forum of that ilk was a bad idea because it just advertises for trouble. Six posts. None serious. I've binned three and am moving one more there.

    This is much better than the other way. :rolleyes:
     
  22. geordienation

    geordienation Moderator

    Apr 21, 2001
    Chicago
    Club:
    Newcastle United FC
    Andy, there is no perfect solution. Your reply is to mod heavier. Well, if that's the case, then a lot of good discussions which have been in there over the last 12 months would NEVER have stuck around during your time as Mod.

    What Brian says is right. I guess it's a little frustrating that instead of PM'ing me or Brian or TCM with suggestions that we find them in here.

    We've tried to reconfigure it several times (Links and Articles, Non soccer biz) in an effort to keep the amount of nonsense to a minimum ("Tyson wearing a soccer jersey").

    Thanks for all the feedback. :rolleyes:
     
  23. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    I thought Andy's point was that he moved threads that he judged off topic to other boards. So it wasn't that these good discussions didn't happen but that they happened (or not) on another board. I don't see any reason why every discussion posted on B&M should remain on B&M. It is possible for mods to make judgments, that is to distinguish between on and off topic threads and move them to a more appropriate board.

    But maybe that's just me - I think the ability to make judgments about all sorts of things is the most important quality a moderator can have. And if that quality is lacking then I think it's ridiculous to believe that configuring the boards any differently is going to solve anything.
     
  24. monster

    monster Member

    Oct 19, 1999
    Hanover, PA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Things did get moved. And people bitched. I thought it was a good idea creating a subforum that appeared above any other thread (so it was less likely to be missed) with a place for threads I believed to clutter the forum.

    Others didn't. Jesse made a change. And now we have a thread basically serving as an open invitation to trolls.
     
  25. Knave

    Knave Member+

    May 25, 1999
    Well of course they did. So the mods should explain why the threads got moved. I still fail to see why making judgments and moving threads is not an option.
     

Share This Page