LOL Is that the kis we will be using during the game vs Fulham? It is not bad. It is about time that we have the sponsors name on the front. Only one sponsor should be allowed though otherwise the kits would look like a NASCAR car!!!
the straight-out-of-the-adidas-catalog kits i can deal with. instead of the massive "Pepsi's Version of Sprite That Absolutely Nobody Drinks" logo on the front, it really should have the city or team name that each player is from.
Am I the only guy here that thinks ads (at least this ASG jersey) look better than the cartoon font on the front of MLS jerseys?
Sorry guys, but I like it. I guess I'm conditioned to it being a Limey, but the ad' just passed me by until it was mentioned on the thread.
There's only one sponsor on the front. The Adidas logo is there because they did the pesky thing of making the jersey.
goddamn, it's like adidas isn't even trying... I'm sure gonna miss Puma next year. The less ads, the better. I came to watch a game, not commericals.
Hmmmmmmm............so says the man whose team wears the 3-stripes across the chest. Looks like an adidas ad to me.
I'm just waiting for the "MLS SHOULD HAVE SPONSORS LOGO ON THE FRONT OF THEIR SHIRTS SO THEY CAN BE JUST LIKE THE REST OF THE WORLD AND SO IT'LL GET ALL THE SOCCER FANS WHO AREN'T TURNING OUT TO THE GAMES TO COME OUT" crew to step and defend that shirt. After all, it's what they've been clamoring for.
I would rather see this than sponsors on the front of MLS jerseys: I say stick with the team names. If anything, REMOVE the goofy team names, but keep the crests. THAT would be kicking it old school.
Sierra Mist is one of the biggest sponsers MLS has along with adidas. SO if in an exhibition on national TV (ABC) they want to promote their product..they have ever right to do so without a bunch of crybabies going on about it.