Articles from England

Discussion in 'Youth National Teams' started by JG, Jan 12, 2003.

  1. Sandon Mibut

    Sandon Mibut Member+

    Feb 13, 2001
    Somehow the second article is gonna work its way into a Paul Gardner column that raises the point that American soccer is too inundated with a British coaching philosophy of direct soccer that even the Brits are now saying is counter-productice to developing good players.

    Then he'll conclude that US Soccer needs a more Latin style... And then he'll admit he has a fetish for little brown boys.

    OK, perhaps he won't do that third part but the others will happen, guaranteed.
     
  2. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer New Member

    Sep 3, 1999
    Those are some good articles.
     
  3. superdave

    superdave Member+

    Jul 14, 1999
    Raleigh NC
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Link didn't work for me...can anyone summarize?
     
  4. Dan Roudebush

    Dan Roudebush New Member

    Mar 31, 1999
    But Sandon you haven't stated that you would disagreewith PG?

    Hughe's philosophy sucks.

    Not going direct,as many Brazil teams will play long ball, but contantly as in the premier league play. .There is little deception.
     
  5. voros

    voros Member

    Jun 7, 2002
    Parts Unknown
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I would take issue with Cartwright not calling Beckham a world class player. Obviously people's definitions of "world class" differ, but if Beckham isn't good enough to reach Cartwright's definition, then Cartwright's definition isn't useful in addressing his original point (how to develop young English players). After all, Beckham is certainly good enough to be used as a top target for how good you want your best players to be. If the fact that David Beckham is the best player their youth system could develop is supposed to be some sort of indictment of it, color me unconvinced.
     

Share This Page