Anshutz called before Congress on insider trading concerns

Discussion in 'Business and Media' started by Jimbo, Sep 26, 2002.

  1. Jimbo

    Jimbo Member

    Dec 17, 1999
    Washington, DC
  2. FootyMundo

    FootyMundo New Member

    Mar 1, 2001
    Minneapolis
    If he did have a pre-existing contract in place and can demonstrate this fact, then there should be no issue. The contract would need to have specified the price at which to sell shares and would have needed to have been entered into when he was not in possession of MII. The article indicates that he had such an arrangement in place. The question then becomes whether that is true.

    Of course given the witch hunt mentality presently in place he may still suffer significant reputational damage. But if such an arrangement was in fact in place he has committed no crime.
     
  3. chayes

    chayes New Member

    Feb 29, 2000
    Raleigh, NC
  4. CrewDust

    CrewDust Member

    May 6, 1999
    Columbus, Ohio
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Congress needs to stop wasteing time on these minor issues and get to the bottom of the NJ and DC Stadium issues.
     
  5. Sandon Mibut

    Sandon Mibut Member+

    Feb 13, 2001
    Well, at least we should get some more up-to-date picture of St. Phil!
     
  6. Jimbo

    Jimbo Member

    Dec 17, 1999
    Washington, DC
    Not so fast. Anschutz was interviewed by staffers on Friday over the phone. Afterwards, committee chair Billy Tauzin said his committee wouldn't haul in Anschutz to testify. They were satisfied with Anschutz's explanation of stock sales made in May and June. BTW, he still owns 18% of Qwest, or 301 million shares, after selling 6.1 million shares for $213.5 million. Qwest closed at $2.26 Friday. It was over $40 per share a year ago. He's lost a ton of money on paper.
     
  7. BenReilly

    BenReilly New Member

    Apr 8, 2002
    Yes, the Anschutz case is vastly different. He has pretty much gone down with the ship.
     
  8. FootyMundo

    FootyMundo New Member

    Mar 1, 2001
    Minneapolis
    See my explanation. I do this stuff for a living. THAT is the reason he was left alone. He merely put a contract in place and it was triggered. Perfectly legal.
     
  9. deejay

    deejay Member+

    Feb 14, 2000
    Tarpon Springs, FL
    Club:
    Jorge Wilstermann
    Nat'l Team:
    Bolivia
    The Denver Posts says that Anshutz is cleared of all suspicions of insider trading.

    That should be the end of this story.
     
  10. FlashMan

    FlashMan Member

    Jan 6, 2000
    'diego
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hallelujah.

    (Though I'm generally no fan of profittaking, pension stealing, corporate dogs.)
     
  11. Detective40oz

    Detective40oz Member

    Jun 16, 2000
    Fairfax, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Yep saw in the USA Today that he will not be called in to testify...MLS lives on to see another day...now about these playoff attendances..WC Boost? ;)
     
  12. nancyb

    nancyb Member

    Jun 30, 2000
    Falls Church, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  13. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
    bottom of that article says they are going after phil for 4.8 million and 1.4 billion

    he is being asked to repay the most
     
  14. nancyb

    nancyb Member

    Jun 30, 2000
    Falls Church, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    that's going after the deep pockets system. Dang, I didn't get to the bottom of that thang.
     
  15. CTfan

    CTfan New Member

    Jan 5, 2001
    Charlottesville, VA
  16. FlashMan

    FlashMan Member

    Jan 6, 2000
    'diego
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I take back my "hallelujah" and replace it with a "oy vey".

    :(
     

Share This Page