I went ahead and put this in the conservative media bias thread because....well...MSNBC let someone use their site to write this trash Opinion | Michael Conway: If President-elect Joe Biden hopes to fulfill his pledge to unify the nation, he should do the unthinkable and pardon Donald Trump. -@NBCNewsTHINKhttps://t.co/cSkhYA5Jxt— MSNBC (@MSNBC) November 22, 2020 my least favorite part was this: dear msnbc.....I know it feels like centuries....but it hasn’t been so long that you should forget the fact that administrations don’t to criminal investigations....the FBI does, and administrations don’t do prosecutions, the DOJ does. Your further normalization of this very idea is somehow acceptable is simply the icing on the cake of your monumental ********ing failure to adequately cover the last four years. ******** you.
While I don't really care whether there is a pardon for Trump or not (Trump would just deny everything after the fact), I really agree with your "dear msnbc" comment. It is this bullcrap that really boils my blood. Well said.
The teaser of a Yahoo! story - "Trump gains in Wisconsin recount not enough to win" Ummm, yeah. Biden picked up 87 net votes in the Wisconsin recount.
Here's another awesome take: Sarah Cooper is the one who brought down Trump. It wasn't all of Trumps awfulness at all! 1333148749846224899 is not a valid tweet id
"NBC News could not independently verify whether the email is authentic and unaltered"genius— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) December 12, 2020 NBC continuing to fail us.
Since the thread has been reactivated: While the media loves to glamorize these Trump rallies, I literally got 5x the number of people to DC for a rally for impeachment in Sept 2019. This is a really tiny crowd, and smaller than a few weeks ago. This is not a pending civil war, but a small group of cult members.— Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈 (@Amy_Siskind) December 12, 2020 These RWNJ rallies are rather small, in the size of a few thousands. Larger rallies have been minimized and treated as marginal.
That’s terrible, compared with the diversity and talent of the current administration: Why? What is the f-ing purpose of publishing this? What journalistic value does it have? It's click bait at best, and that's a pretty low standard.— FunWhileItLasted (@richsin603) December 13, 2020
Of course I forgot again. I checked social media and got out of there when I saw Proud Boys were doing what they do.
I have, however, done 360 tomahawk slam dunks after taking off at the free throw line The "Doctor" is thus earned.
You cannot disagree with facts.... You cannot “disagree” with a factYou would never run a poll saying “Most feel gravity is real but some disagree”Every time a news outlet does something like this they validate the idea that the conspiracy theory “Biden didn’t win the election” might have a shot at being true https://t.co/RBfptsDZ23— Matt Negrin, HOST OF HARDBALL AT 7PM ON MSNBC (@MattNegrin) December 13, 2020
WSJ: Girls can’t be doctors. Also WSJ: Those girl doctors are playing the gender card!!!! WSJ edit page editor @WSJopinion doubles down on op-ed on Jill Biden. Claims the criticism is the work of the Biden camp playing the gender card instead of commentary on an insulting opinion piece that was so dumb it could be read as parody. https://t.co/iNO1t1NZcq— bob davis (@bobdavis187) December 14, 2020
Epstein's sexism was there, but casually so. His real argument was that an education degree from the University of Delaware doesn't count. That's why he mentioned both items, prominently. Had Jill Biden received a physics degree from Princeton I doubt that he would have written his article. It was a breathtakingly arrogant example of educational elitism, in support of a party that loudly claims to be opposed to educational elitism.
I used to read the WaPo. But thanks God I don't have to, since they want me to pay to read such stupidity: The 2nd WaPo opinion in days that make me happy I don't subscribe. Nikki Haley - seriously, @washingtonpost ? https://t.co/7q5RFzAjSW— Gina Hofner (@HofGina) December 17, 2020