How odd. Do you have a link to what you were reading? No. No, it doesn't. One crackpot author does not balance out the weight of established knowledge in the fields in question. Therefore, they do not meet in the middle. The crackpot author is all by himself waaaaay at the other end of the line from all of the experts who are not crackpots.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/12/pentagon-zombie-pigs-first-then-hibernating-gis/ It's not reanimating dead bodies - it's about delivering a drug or "cocktail" that will essentially cause hibernation of someone who has suffered a major combat injury and massive blood loss. The idea is to shut/slow down as many body systems as possible so the soldier survives until they can be transported to advanced medical care. It's not creating zombies at all, despite the popular press.
Well, he had to. The original was written by a member of the mainstream press, and is thus part of the lying conspiracy. Anything the journalist says is wrong, and anything different you make up is right.
I didn't misinterpret, I think that you might have misread me. This is what I wrote: Upon rereading this now, I see where you can misinterpret. I apologize. What I meant to say was that Sitchin, in one of his books speaks about reanimated bodies. Then I alluded to the story about the Darpa grant and the chemical that would be injected into soldiers who are wounded on the battle field.
Stop assuming things. You are wrong on all accounts. Althought, we can't say that the mainstream press hasn't passed along lies and mistruths in the past. So I would take anything thats said with a grain of salt.
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have used "misrepresent" because that's too strong a word for what I was trying to say but I was tired and cranky and too lazy to think of a better word.
I'm not assuming anything. I'm simply using what you yourself have said to point out your absurdity in a humorous way.
This thread was set as a trap for aliens. Aliens can't resist posting here & once they post we red card them.
I've come to believe that these so called E.T.'s are in fact fallen angels/demons and not fom another planet at all.
Well it was shown before Christmas actually but yea I saw it. Nothing I haven't heard of before ( big paranormal buff here ) but I find it funny how defensive and angry archeologists get over this stuff.
You might be talking about a different show. The one I saw had almost no one giving opposing views. There were a couple of token people but there was nothing resembling a point-by-point refutation of the utter horseshit that the ancient astronaut crowd was spouting.
Speaking of point-by-point refutation, what are the explanations for that so called "landing strip" in the mountain range in chile I believe? Also with the huge puzzled shaped stones stacked on top of each other in south america as well? I've always been curious.
Do you mean the Nazca Lines in Peru? I'm pretty sure that most people who don't think they're runways for ancient aliens believe that they are religious in nature. Ancient people were skilled masons? Isn't that the most likely explanation?
I don't think its the Nazca lines, if I remember correctly from the Ancient Aliens documentary it looks like a typical runway except on top of a mountain range, where the peaks of these mountains have been flattened, and according to the proponents it was alien engineers who designed this so ufos could safely land.
I guess I can't address what you're specifically referring to since you don't even know yourself. Anyway, do you think aliens came to earth in ships that needed runways? You don't think that a race of beings that mastered interstellar travel hasn't mastered landing without a runway? Is that reasonable?