So we agree: in the end, Honduras wasn't disrespected. If anything some of the Chilean players were honest and admitted to not knowing some of the Honduran players (kind of expected, utilero ). Do you think Amado Guevara and David Suazo knowa about the Dutch Antilles starters before Honduras plays them in CONCACAF qualifying? So, in other words, Yanez: I am agreeing with you .
I think Honduras took this a lot seriously than we did...it is a shame and a bit embarrasing the Chilean players only started worrying when they were 1 man down. Did anyone notice Chile actually controlled play with 1 less player for most of the second half? Even the comentator from Honduras said the goal was the first shot on goal from Honduras that half? What would have happened if Chile had played like that from minute 1 when they had all players? They tried to make up for it in the end but tried to hard and made it tougher on themselves by trying to show off and take on the Honduras defense individualy instead of a team. I don't care if it's a 'A', 'B', 'C' or 'Z' team. Anytime a player puts on that red jersey they better take it seriously! If you are not then don't make these friendlies instead of looking like a clown.
The excuse was "we lost, we played with 10..." that was not our fault, not that they said it but i was just tryin' to highlite and reiterate that it was not our fault...
I understand that both teams played with their B squad but Chile should have won that game their league is supposed to be alittle better than Honduras no??
Typical Mosco comment. LOL Isn't the Mexican league supposedly better than the Honduran one? If so, how do you explain you guys losing to them?
The ref had nothing to do with it. I didn't expect any different type of response from you, though. Do you have anything remotely intelligent to contibute?