Adu probably means Etch is gone; Hudson too? (Wagman & Davidson, SoccerTimes 11/21) http://www.soccertimes.com/mls/2003/nov21.htm Don't tell me we're not getting MLS's special "make it up as we go along" treatment here with the Etch allocation. The idea that we're due an allocation for a player that we're apparently going to waive ... !?! I repeat: !?!. I understand why MLS is doing it. I just wish it weren't wrapped up in all this bullsh!t to make it look legit. Then again, maybe, it'll play itself out differently than Wagman and Davidson say here. One other thing, even I, by reputation the most vitriolic of Etch bashers, think it rather classless that it'd come down to waiving him. That would lack all grace. Hopefully he'll retire or just move on and the whole waiving business will just go away. It would be a shame if it really did end that way.