Adidas boots vs Nike boots

Discussion in 'Soccer Boots' started by arcticduane, May 2, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. arcticduane

    arcticduane Member

    May 1, 2004
    Bradford, England
    Hi. Ive always wanted to know which r better so really this is just pulse vs AZTIII and f50 vs vapor i myself think adidas have ore revolutionary products (f50s insoles, X-traxion , predator and the fold over tongue) what about you guys. :D
     
  2. designez1

    designez1 Member

    Nov 19, 2003
    New York
    There's already another thread about this topic https://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?t=105506

    I wrote this:
    Nike = great marketing and commercials! It drives much more on its image and goodlooking products. However they have been losing their touch if you see the AZT90 III... Still everybody talks about them because Nike knows how to manipulate & hype us :D Make up your own mind and don't believe that everything with a swoosh is as cool as they want you to believe! I've heard that the Vapors costs about $20-$30 to make!!! You are paying $150 for the Nike logo and cool ads.

    Adidas = great, innovative & well-built products. They were making soccerboots probably before your parents were born and long before Nike even existed. You can't buy that kind of quality, expertise and class. It's the BMW and Porsche of sportsbrands...
    In the end it's your money, but I'll always go for the three stripes.
     
  3. achyx

    achyx New Member

    Apr 16, 2004
    UK
    i don't know if its a psychological thing, but i can always run in lighter boots, and that means NIKE. Adidas make heavy boots in comparison to Nike, and now after ive jumped to nike, i reckon ill be staying here..
     
  4. Dr. Boots

    Dr. Boots Member+

    Aug 15, 2002
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    please use the thread link above to post anymore info on this topic
     

Share This Page