Academy at Home Depot

Discussion in 'MLS: News & Analysis' started by kayasoleil, Jun 12, 2003.

  1. kayasoleil

    kayasoleil New Member

    Aug 14, 2002
    Virginia
    Maybe this has been discussed, but did anyone note when Wynalda mentioned during the opening game broadcast that there was to be an academy in the future at the center? what type of academy? For US soccer youth nationals? Moving U-17? Adding U-16? U-18? U-14?

    maybe he was just talking...or maybe something is in the works?
     
  2. NEKSoccer

    NEKSoccer Member

    Jul 21, 2000
    Long Island, NY
    ANY soccer school there is good enough for me. My cousin's kid went to soccer school at the Maracana Stadium in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. So why not have one here at HDC?
     
  3. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
    u-20 is the one that has been discussed the most... bruce wants an under 20 residency program to be started, however it won't start until after the u-20 championships and women's cup are over

    the u-17 program won't be moved... it's at the ideal place for a highschool program... carson is the ideal spot for an u-20 program.... csudh is right there for college age kids to take classes and participate in a residency program

    it will happen
     
  4. geordienation

    geordienation Moderator

    Apr 21, 2001
    Chicago
    Club:
    Newcastle United FC
    It's the one Jurgen Klinnsman is setting up.
     
  5. Revolt

    Revolt Member+

    Jun 16, 1999
    Davis, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    As a side bar, big article in yesterday's Sac Bee about contenders for upcoming NCAA Track & Field Championships. HDT is a prime competitor to snag competition.
     
  6. HalaMadrid

    HalaMadrid Member

    Apr 9, 1999
    Actually it WILL be moved...it just can't be yet. USSF has a contract with IMG for a few more years.

    Though a possibility has been raised of keeping it and establishing a West Coast U-17 academy.
     
  7. keeppah

    keeppah Member

    Feb 10, 2000
    Taunton, MA
    I hadn't heard of this, but this sounds great. I'm NOT advocating more than 3-4 residency camps, but it would be nice if there were a few around the country. The problem lies with how many are too many. In other words, at what point are the players not getting the best coaching or is their training being watered down by practicing with lesser-skilled players?
     
  8. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078

    from what i understand... a college isn't a highschool

    so i don't see the intelligence in moving it to carson's victoria street

    img is set up perfectly for highschool kids in a residency program, while carson is set up perfectly for a college age residency program... and you will see an under 20 program started in carson
     
  9. dcc134

    dcc134 Member+

    Liverpool FC
    May 15, 2000
    Hummelstown, PA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I have to agree that this makes the most sense.
     
  10. Femfa

    Femfa New Member

    Jun 3, 2002
    Los Angeles
    Many colleges now offer remedial (for college) high school classes on campus to prep students who didn't learn certain fundamentals well while in high school.
    They also offer prep courses for getting a GED, which might serve some of our clever U-17 well - they might be able to get that and start taking college classes.
    It's important to realize how young the curve is for a pro career - if these kids don't get in some college when they're 16 or so, they might never get it because they'll be playing overseas.
    Finally, college classes are better structured than high school for someone that has to travel a lot. Less busy work, more papers and exams that can be made up and so forth.
     
  11. dcc134

    dcc134 Member+

    Liverpool FC
    May 15, 2000
    Hummelstown, PA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, but we are talking about 15 an 16 year old kids, who all aren't on accelerates academic tracks.

    Another advantage of IMG is they are able to mingle with kids from other sports, (girls) who are the same age and dealing with the same issues. IMG has served US soccer well to this point, I don't see the sense in changing it.
     
  12. kevbrunton

    kevbrunton New Member

    Feb 27, 2001
    Edwardsburg, MI
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I agree. There are 3 local high school choices when attending the IMG Academy. There are also residency programs for several sports there -- so although you are being trained and inundated in soccer, you get a chance to mingle with kids from other sports.

    If Carson has or will have any of that, great -- then we can establish a U17 West. Personally, I think that 2 is perfect for the U16/U17 age having 30 to 36 at each camp split evenly between the U16's and the U17's. But the educational opportunities have to be established at Carson first.

    Once some of the other sports gets going at Carson, then we'll be able to look at expanding the soccer beyond the U20's.

    Personally, I think that the U20 residency should be a temporary program. Once MLS has full reserve squads, anyone that is at the U20 age of the caliber to be in a residendy program should be in professional training. Perhaps the reserve squad schedule could have openings such that the U20 squad could train together for a couple weeks each quarter. But the rest of the time, these guys would be training with their MLS team.
     
  13. lightningback

    lightningback New Member

    Jan 27, 2003
    Carson
    The Galaxy is working on a Galaxy specific academy as well. Similar to Metro? and the Fire?, I believe.
     
  14. dcc134

    dcc134 Member+

    Liverpool FC
    May 15, 2000
    Hummelstown, PA
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    This is where the focus really should be.
     
  15. HalaMadrid

    HalaMadrid Member

    Apr 9, 1999
    Well, I'll tell you why it makes sense to move: Because the USSF is paying IMG to use their facility.

    This really isn't a matter of will they move it or not move it; it's going to be moved, or a second program will be set up. it just can't for a few years.

    You really don't think they don't have high schools in Carson?
     
  16. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
    i really don't think a normal highschool is what these guys need

    they travel all over the place, go to school year round, and have spells when they can't be in school with normal students

    so it takes something special, like img

    img is getting some good pub for what they do with the u-17's... so there could very easily be a better deal created in the future
     
  17. HalaMadrid

    HalaMadrid Member

    Apr 9, 1999
    IMG doesn't have a special highschool. They go to Edison HS, which is just the local place. Well, they have Pendleton too, but I don;t think everyone goes there.

    You don't think an academic program could be set up tailored to HS kids at a University? There are a couple things holding up the movement of the program at present (pending approval of dormitories at HDC, funding, IMG contract) but academic options are not one of them.
     
  18. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
    i'm just not buying that the ussf has a higher priority to move the u-17's and not to keep guys like corey ashe out of college soccer

    the u-17's are set up and perfectly fine where they are at... the problem is now to keep our slightly older players in a higher level of training

    and the ussf can do it much, much, much faster than mls can do it... hell, they could work together in the long run and short term... but the ussf has to do this first... it's a huge priority
     
  19. HalaMadrid

    HalaMadrid Member

    Apr 9, 1999
    Wait, what does Corey Ashe have to do with moving the academy?

    The USSF has said they'll move it when the contract with IMG expires. This isn't me expressing my preference or opinion, I couldn't care less.
     
  20. jmeissen0

    jmeissen0 New Member

    Mar 31, 2001
    page 1078
    because the entire purpose of the thread is talk of an academy or residency program at victoria street... not where the u-17's might or might not go when there contract is up (and i find it hard to believe they would leave)

    the u-20's would/will wind up in carson before any other youth residency program
     
  21. BWogs

    BWogs New Member

    Jan 28, 2003
    Kansas City
    One question I have is what players would be in the U-20 residency program? It seems like a lot of the potential players are already playing in the MLS if it existed now for example.

    Obviously things could change in the future.
     
  22. DigitalTron

    DigitalTron New Member

    Apr 4, 2001
    Arlington, VA
    While JM0 makes some good points, I think Hala is correct here. While there are no "certain" plans for almost anything related to USMYT residency programs, the two primary options for the U-17's being considered presently are moving them to HDC or creating a second one at HDC. Either way, it is likely that some variation of U-17 or U-16 will end up at HDC.

    JM0 is probably correct about the U-20's though. The difference is that the U-20's wouldn't spend very much time in residency. While it would be nice to have them all attend the same college, that's just not going to happen. The U-20 camp would not be for MLS starter caliber players, but rather for the next tier of talent, and then only for some short stints and possibly the summer months.

    But the key is that everything is written in mud. Statements made are a good indicator of current thought, but nothing is written in stone. Hala's economics argument (if the US is paying, it wants to compensate AEG/CSDH for their investment into US soccer) is correct.

    I may be wrong, but I believe the Edison High School correctly referenced by Hala is called "Edison Learning Center" or somesuch. Sorry to nitpick, but I just wanted to underscore that it may not be a traditional high school, but rather one that has more choices and flexibility.

    Excellent ideas, excellent discussion. Anyone reading this thread and enjoying it should really check out the US Juniors forum. It's loaded with excellent discussions like this one. It can be found here:

    https://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=255

    -Digital
     
  23. The Cadaver

    The Cadaver It's very quiet here.

    Oct 24, 2000
    La Cañada, CA
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Do not know if this adds anything to the discussion, but the following is taken from the Home Depot Center web site:

    QUOTE:

    The U.S. Soccer Federation operates 11 National Teams, an Under-14 Developmental Program, Coaching Licensing Schools and Referee Training courses, all of which will use The Home Depot Center as a national training facility and headquarters.

    In addition to the natural grass stadium, the National Training Center at Cal State University, Dominguez Hills will feature five training fields, a practice area and a central building to house office space, locker rooms, a weight training room, physical therapy training rooms and player lounges. The NTC complex will also include a residential component, which will allow teams to stay at the facility.

    END QUOTE

    Please note the part that say, "all of which will use."

    We'll see.
     
  24. mpruitt

    mpruitt Member

    Feb 11, 2002
    E. Somerville
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    i think that the U-20 residency program would be a great idea. As Jim mentioned having the thing on a college campus is perfect. My biggest concern always is what happens to our U-17s after they graduate the program? TO me the answer is maybe having them graduating into that program, even if it only serves as a sort of reserve team for MLSers who aren't geteting time, or kids who don't want to go the college route.

    Ideally, I wouldn't mind seeing a training academy U-20 team residency to serve as sort of an overall reserve team for young MLSers.

    However, it would also be good to keep the quality of young MLSers improving. I think that a lot of people who've complained about a quality of play because of so many youngins might like this idea. Much as you see in Major League Baseball, you might see teams passing on drafting a very young kid until he was out of the u-20 residency.

    Overall, this is just a good idea. With the results that the U-17 program has shown this isnothing but a good idea, especially for those players who may develop at a later age.
     
  25. Senor Askew

    Senor Askew Member

    Jan 19, 2001
    San Francisco, CA.
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Then why, for ************s sake, are they in college?

    Another glowing endorsement for the American education system.
     

Share This Page