WHY THE SOUTH IS BETTER THEN THE NORTH were better the nthe north because we have manners and we have more bombs
Re: WHY THE SOUTH IS BETTER THEN THE NORTH Gee timmy, that was a well thought out attempt at a complete sentence. It's good to have goals in life, and your dream of one day learning to count past eleven and maybe even be able to spell tough words like we're and the is a lofty one, but I'm sure that by the time you finally complete the fifth grade, your thirty eight year old mind should be able to accomplish this elusive feat. Good luck, tiger.
Tabernacle! Forget da Molson,you Anglican,come and try and take our water,goddam,when you turn everyplace south of le Fleuve St.Laurent into a desert,you afl guy..We will have the Nordiques Old Timers shoot rondelles at your heads,no? You don' know what a lap dance is?Too bad for you... Calisse,you probably eat your chips without cheese and gravy.And your damn monnaie,only one color!How do you know what to tip the lap dancer,eh? BTW,the original author of this demographic theory included Quebec as a seperate "nation".
I must say, this is the least deserving sticky thread in the history of Big Soccer...and that's saying a lot. I think GringoTex is just stroking his own ego with this moderator abuse!
This is at least a 20-year old theory.I remember that there were originally nine distinct areas noted. New England (inc. Maritimes) Megalopolis (Northeast Corridor/Rust Belt) Dixie (guess) The Islands (So Fla and Carribean) Quebec (yeah!!) The Heartland (Midwest and Prairie Provinces) The Empty Quarter (Rocky Mountains&Alaska) Texas-Mexico (Forgot the cute name,but it's essentially Spanglishtown) Ecotopia (NorCal to Vancover,including Victoria) And stop slammin' my mom's side of the family!That's my job!
I'm sure there are plenty of little theories out there on the matter. This restructuring, however, is strictly mine own. I have cultivated it over the last couple years and last year made it more public.
Fair enough,but - Are you sure you never read any similar works on this issue before developing the theory? It's always good to note sources. BTW,I'm almost serious about the water bit that I mentioned previously.If we ever initiate military action against Canada,it will be to gain direct US control over resources such as water.
I wasn't kidding when I said I've only read six books in my life. Honest to god. I've never studied for anything in my life and never paid attention to things I wasn't interested in in school. Therefore, it's not hard to figure out why college wasn't a good plan in my life. Proper education is one of the most overrated commodities on the market today.
> If we ever initiate military action against > Canada,it will be to gain direct US control over > resources such as water. Hey, I already said this years ago on this forum. Too bad all our posts were lost.
NEW AMERICAN ORDER UPDATE Acting as emissary for amerifolklegend and his New American Order, I offered Ohio to indians. "No thank you," indians said, "we'd prefer to continue playing with tomahawks in and around illegal government uranium mines in the middle of a desert than move to ************ing Ohio."
Actually the state is Colorado, and the signs say "My parents didn't move all the way from Iowa to Long Beach to live with minorities!"
And forfeit the only currently functioning SSS in existence in the former USA? Of course to get rid of Cleveland, that forfeiture might be worth it.
Michigan will happily trade Ohio and Indiana for northeastern Illinois and a section of Ontario to be named later.