United have 39 points despite having one of the worst defenses of all the top teams in Europe and having played poorly in many, many matches this season. It's not a stretch to speculate that if they had better players and played in a more stable and suitable system they would run away with the prem. It is a stretch however to assume that the bottom ten teams from the prem would beat out the bottom 10 teams from La Liga. Teams in La Liga outside of Real and Barca have far less resources than teams in the prem yet they play the better football and have close to the same points totals as the teams outside of Man Utd, Man City and Chelsea in the prem. Yet they're only 2 points ahead of Valladolid who have to deal with far tougher opposition and have much less resources. And they have the same points total as Torino in Serie A with a far worse GD.. ------- How does the prem being flush with cash prove that the bottom teams are somehow greater than the other bottom teams in Europe? Pulling power or financial power means little if you don't do the business on the pitch. Just ask Man City.
I might have taken it differently if I didn't get bad news about my mom's health recently and if I hadn't had 3 tankards of beer last night. 1 tankard equal 25oz of beer.
Nah, you're just pretentious. The internet is such a funny place. The problem with letting your personal side become over exposed on here is that you begin to take everything else too seriously.
The points totals last season don't really suggest this is true. If anything - it risks becoming a beat up league like Spain - but just with 3 big monied sides not two.
Apparently the Zimbabwean FA is putting forward evidence that some player in 1972 scored 116 goals in a calendar year, trying to take Messi's record back. Chialtu is the name, Sid Lowe is tweeting about it.