Polar opposites. For PSG-Atletico it took me 3 hours to get into the stadium. I live 20 mins from the Rose Bowl, and I spent 30 mins on the freeway, and then 2.5 hours from the freeway exit to the parking lot (about a mile and a half distance). There were traffic control workers that had no idea what they were doing — at one point I was literally stuck in the same spot for over half an hour. It got so bad that when I finally got into the parking lot, they weren’t even checking for parking passes. Anyway, due to the terrible planning I ended up missing the whole first half. Having that experience in mind, I left about 4 hours early for yesterday’s game between River and Monterrey because under no circumstances was I going to miss even a minute of that match. Maybe getting there so early made the difference or maybe they simply sorted logistical things out having a few CWC games under their belts at that point, but it took me about 10 minutes to get from the freeway exit to my parking spot. Smooth as butter. And it’s not like I was the first one there: when I got there, there were already thousands among thousands of River fans there tailgating — making barbecues, singing, playing soccer. It was great! Ended up hanging with the crowds outside, before going into the stadium and crowdwatching leading to the event. No regrets whatsoever getting there so early. Waaaay better experience than that of PSG-Atletico, no doubt
Ouch. With both teams virtually owned by the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, it’s almost like Man City went out of their way to prove that no conflict of interest exists. Impressed by Salzburg. They are definitely exceeding my expectations.
Enough “on paper” differences/distractions I suppose. Grupo Pachuca didn’t have enough time to move things around on a group org chart. Very pleased their “replacement” fell flat on their face.
Rudiger claims racial abuse in Pachuca match: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c307nylpq37o I was wondering what that argument was about.
Going to miss the early match time slot matches. Now we have to wait until 3 PM EST and 9 PM EST time for the simultaneous kicks these last Group match days.
Brasil is reportedly interested in hosting the next tournament. https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_...xpresses-interest-hosting-club-world-cup-2029
Star the speculation now: Which Brazilian club will CR7 get transferred to in the months leading up to the 2029 Club WC?
Between Morocco-Iberia, Brazil, and Australia-New Zealand all of them are good choices. I'm probably asking for too much, but I would like to see a proper bidding process with a decision by the FIFA Congress. Hey, a man can dream.
South America lead the way - which continents are performing best at the Club World Cup? https://www.transfermarkt.com/south...-best-at-the-club-world-cup-/view/news/455846
I think there is something to be said about how under the old format teams like the Brazilian clubs would have to fly all the way to the other side of the world after a long grueling season in December. Now they are playing at least in the same hemisphere and they are in form due to it being more the middle of their schedule calendar.
Yeah, agree. Related to that I wonder if UEFA teams kinda sleep-walked their way into this tournament. For most of them, their opening CWC match marked their first match in a month. And maybe first meaningful match in ~1.5 to 2 months. Would not be surprised if we see them getting stronger as the tournament progresses.
I don’t think the hemisphere has much to do with it. I think there are two factors: the tournament being in June, rather than in December/January after a very tiring Libertadores/Brasileirao season (both end in December). The other factor being the different format of this tournament. You screw up one game and you can still be in it. In the other CWC format you have one bad night and it’s all over. Look at Palmeiras, for example — the first game they tied 0-0 vs Porto. In the other format, that could have lead to a penalty shootout that they might have lost, and there goes their whole tournament. With this expanded CWC format, on the other hand, you have more wiggle room to prove you’re the “better” side
Whatever the reasons are, I think it's safe to say Conmebol has (once again) firmly established itself as the second strongest confederation in the club game. I used to be quite critical, questioning the seeded status of the Libertadores winner in the old format. Especially from 2016-2020 and 2018-2022 when the Libertadores champions lost three out of five semifinals in the referenced five-year timeframe. But here in 2025, the results speak for themselves...
So let me get this straight, travel is a significant factor? Even if your fans are generally the loudest in the stands?
In Infantino's FIFA? LOL no - you'll get backroom deals and a vote by acclamation and you'll like it. Eh... I'd still have complained about the preferential seeding if the old format had been maintained (as the official CWC, that is). But the distribution of berths for this CWC has certainly been justified.
Everything is a factor. There is not just one variable. But when it comes to specific circumstances and trends and results you can clearly see that MLS and USA club teams do not like playing in front of thousands of Mexican fans. They almost never , ever win big games in those specific circumstances.