2019 MLS Week 31 Referee Discussion

Discussion in 'MLS Referee Forum' started by ManiacalClown, Oct 2, 2019.

  1. ManiacalClown

    ManiacalClown Member+

    Jun 27, 2003
    South Jersey
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    10/06/19

    Atlanta United vs New England Revolution
    Mercedes-Benz Stadium (4PM ET)
    REF: Ismail Elfath
    AR1: Corey Parker
    AR2: Chris Wattam
    4TH: Mark Allatin
    VAR: Sorin Stoica
    AVAR: Peter Manikowski

    D.C. United vs FC Cincinnati
    Audi Field (4PM ET)
    REF: Dave Gantar
    AR1: Jason White
    AR2: CJ Morgante
    4TH: Ismir Pekmic
    VAR: Rosendo Mendoza
    AVAR: Craig Lowry

    FC Dallas vs Sporting Kansas City
    Toyota Stadium (4PM ET)
    REF: Alan Kelly
    AR1: Eric Weisbrod
    AR2: Brian Dunn
    4TH: Baldomero Toledo
    VAR: Jose Carlos Rivero
    AVAR: Kevin Terry

    Houston Dynamo vs LA Galaxy
    BBVA Stadium (4PM ET)
    REF: Allen Chapman
    AR1: Jeremy Hanson
    AR2: Nick Uranga
    4TH: Elton Garcia
    VAR: Ricardo Salazar
    AVAR: Jonathan Johnson

    Los Angeles FC vs Colorado Rapids
    Banc of California Stadium (4PM ET)
    REF: Robert Sibiga
    AR1: Eduardo Mariscal
    AR2: Kevin Klinger
    4TH: Michael Radchuk
    VAR: Edvin Jurisevic
    AVAR: Fabio Tovar

    Montreal Impact vs New York Red Bulls
    Saputo Stadium (4PM ET)
    REF: Nima Saghafi
    AR1: Adam Wienckowski
    AR2: Jeremy Kieso
    4TH: Marcos DeOliveira
    VAR: Chico Grajeda
    AVAR: Thomas Supple

    Orlando City vs Chicago Fire
    Exploria Stadium (4PM ET)
    REF: Pierre-Luc Lauziere
    AR1: Oscar Mitchell-Carvalho
    AR2: Jose Da Silva
    4TH: Christopher Penso
    VAR: Kevin Terry Jr
    AVAR: Jozef Batko

    Philadelphia Union vs New York City FC
    Talen Energy Stadium (4PM ET)
    REF: Drew Fischer
    AR1: Jeff Hosking
    AR2: Gjovalin Bori
    4TH: Fotis Bazakos
    VAR: Geoff Gamble
    AVAR: Cory Richardson

    Portland Timbers vs San Jose Earthquakes
    Providence Park (4PM ET)
    REF: Rubiel Vazquez
    AR1: Logan Brown
    AR2: Brian Poeschel
    4TH: Luis Guardia
    VAR: Tim Ford
    AVAR: Cameron Blanchard

    Seattle Sounders vs Minnesota United
    CenturyLink Field (4PM ET)
    REF: Kevin Stott
    AR1: Mike Rottersman
    AR2: Eric Boria
    4TH: Farhad Dadkho
    VAR: Alex Chilowicz
    AVAR: Joshua Patlak

    Toronto FC vs Columbus Crew
    BMO Field (4PM ET)
    REF: Armando Villarreal
    AR1: Jeffrey Greeson
    AR2: Ian McKay
    4TH: David Barrie
    VAR: Jorge Gonzalez
    AVAR: Robert Schaap

    Vancouver Whitecaps vs Real Salt Lake
    BC Place (4PM ET)
    REF: Ted Unkel
    AR1: Kyle Atkins
    AR2: Corey Rockwell
    4TH: Ramy Touchan
    VAR: Joe Dickerson
    AVAR: Rene Parra


    Congratulations are in order as Pierre-Luc Lauziere gets whistle #1, and Robert Sibiga gets whistle #100.

    Sibiga is the quickest to ever get to 100 regular season MLS whistles, with 1576 days from his first to his 100th on Sunday.
     
    IASocFan and Bradley Smith repped this.
  2. AremRed

    AremRed Member+

    Sep 23, 2013
    Workhorse. Would be interesting to know how many matchweeks in that span he didn't have a whistle.
     
  3. LampLighter

    LampLighter Red Card

    Bugeaters FC
    Apr 13, 2019
    Is Stott showing any signs of slowing? I assume he's doing straight EPO and Testosterone boosters by now.
     
  4. ubelmann

    ubelmann New Member

    Seattle Sounders
    United States
    Jun 16, 2017
    POR vs SJ is a big assignment for Vazquez—given where the teams are in the standings, it is about as close to a playoff game as you get without actually being a playoff game. Plus the game will be nationally televised and it will be well attended.
     
    rh89, Ismitje and MassachusettsRef repped this.
  5. jdmahoney

    jdmahoney Member

    Feb 28, 2017
    Plymouth, MN
    Club:
    Chelsea FC
    I would not have predicted at the beginning of the season that Lauziere would be the first (and last) debut whistle this year (I believe- correct me if there were others).
     
  6. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Mendoza was new this year.
     
  7. GoDawgsGo

    GoDawgsGo Member+

    Nov 11, 2010
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    And before going full time, that would include another 10,000 college, high school, USSF, and unaffiliated matches. A workhorse is an understatement! Glad these guys are full time now and don't have to whore themselves out like they used to just to make ends meet.
     
  8. threeputzzz

    threeputzzz Member+

    May 27, 2009
    Minnesota
    10k games? If you start at 13 and average a game every day year round, you reach 10000 games about age 40.
     
  9. Mikael_Referee

    Mikael_Referee Member+

    Jun 16, 2019
    England
    A question from an outsider looking in - is Rubiel Vazquez a young talent (ie. future top FIFA)?

    I expected a FIFA/Toledo/Kelly/Chapman format of referee for that game to be honest.
     
  10. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    He’s going on the 2020 list with Saghafi. Brown and Uranga on as ARs.

    Whether he’s good enough or not to rise in the FIFA ranks, I truly don’t know. The usage of and focus on VAR has made it a lot more difficult to figure out who is actually officiating and managing matches well. But PRO likes him. This is a surprising appointment but not shocking.
     
  11. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    That non-call in Portland at 27’—yeesh. That’s as clear of a foul and pretty close to an easy red card as you can get. But, historically, we don’t punish fouls after shots. So now that we have VAR, does tradition give way to the facts? I guess not here.
     
    rh89 repped this.
  12. pr0ner

    pr0ner Member+

    Jan 13, 2007
    Alexandria, VA
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I wonder if the double red (one VAR related) in DC is the first time one team went down two men at roughly the same time.
     
  13. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    And that’s not a red in 90 + 3’?! It has to be...
     
    rh89 and TLR2 repped this.
  14. TLR2

    TLR2 Member

    Mar 26, 2016
    Club:
    Everton FC
    he did not have a good game at all
     
  15. rh89

    rh89 Member

    Sep 29, 2015
    OR
    The sheer number of missed KMIs, all benefiting SJ at the expense of POR, is astounding. I wonder if he was so concerned with advantaging the home team that he way over-corrected? But yowza that was rough.

    Question - what's a failed assessment mean for a referee like Vazquez mean? We've seen a couple referees flunk out of PRO, but I'm not sure how many failed assessments it takes. I honestly hope Vazquez gets another opportunity and learns from this, but what does this mean for him?
     
  16. ManiacalClown

    ManiacalClown Member+

    Jun 27, 2003
    South Jersey
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I would have liked to see both reds given, but I don't think the first one rises to the level of a clear and obvious error because there's no stud contact. It's still far too high and late, though.

    The one in second half added time I think needed to be reviewed. Lunging scissor from behind while facing the immediate end of your season? Just has to be red.


    EDIT: I forgot the first one was in the penalty area so there's your in road for a review. It's a clear foul.
     
    rh89 and MassachusettsRef repped this.
  17. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Exactly.
     
  18. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    A FIFA badge.

    Maybe he’s less likely to get a playoff match, but it’s not like PRO viewed this as a gamble. One bad match doesn’t change anything.
     
  19. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Honestly, it felt like a fear to make a big decision coupled with a VAR standard that was WAY higher than the week-to-week standard we saw this season. Whether or not that perceived fear had anything to do with the fact that VAR is viewed as a fail-safe is anyone’s guess. But it really felt like Vazquez was avoiding making big calls because he knew he had Ford there and then Ford didn’t intervene because it didn’t want to be the story once Vazquez passed on a decision. Felt like a self-fulfilling prophecy. Or the EPL.

    The whole match felt wrong—it felt like something from 5-10 years ago in MLS. Luckily it didn’t affect the result. But if either Timbers attacker had been seriously injured we’d have a big problem—and that easily could have happened.
     
    rh89 repped this.
  20. Mikael_Referee

    Mikael_Referee Member+

    Jun 16, 2019
    England
    If someone responds the minutes of the crucial decisions from Vázquez's game, I'll cut them into video clips
     
  21. rh89

    rh89 Member

    Sep 29, 2015
    OR
    I think that’s true, but how do you see the Review for the handball. I don’t think that should be a handball, but Ford felt confident enough to recommend a review. Why did Ford not send down any later decisions?
     
  22. ManiacalClown

    ManiacalClown Member+

    Jun 27, 2003
    South Jersey
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    On the handling, I suppose the key was that it came off the player's knee before the arm, but I think next year that's almost certainly a foul so it's going to feel wrong to a lot of folks.
     
  23. doog

    doog Member

    Jun 11, 2006
    I guess I'm in rh89's camp, in that I don't understand Tim Ford's standard in this match. Of all of the plays that were eligible for review, I think he picked the most suspect one to send down. If that's Ford's standard for clear and obvious, shouldn't the tackle on Paredes in the 26th minute and the tackle on Valentin in the 93rd minute also have qualified?

    The four most controversial calls are probably:

    25:51-26:50 Tackle on Paredes
    32:20 -34:25 - Handling on SJ sent down by VAR.
    84:19-85:05 - Loria simulation yellow card
    92:22-92:45 - Scissor tackle by Rios

    The times all start with the live play and then include multiple replay angles.
     
  24. ManiacalClown

    ManiacalClown Member+

    Jun 27, 2003
    South Jersey
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I agree that the handling was almost certainly less clear of an error than either of those tackles. The standard was quite baffling to me as well.
     
  25. FootyPDX

    FootyPDX Member

    Portland Timbers
    England
    Nov 21, 2017
    Portland has really been getting on PRO's nerves a lot lately. I'm sure he's not completely biased, but he can't be that bad at his job, can he?
     

Share This Page