2010 USSF Div. 2 and USL-2 Attendance Thread

Discussion in 'United Soccer Leagues' started by The Marquis, Apr 13, 2010.

  1. The Marquis

    The Marquis Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 13, 2007
    Washougal, WA
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm going to be keeping track of attendances this year. Be patient with me. I'll track both USSF Div. 2 and USL-2. Thanks to VioletCrown for passing along the historical data from his tracking last year and from other sources (I assume kenn.com) for previous years.

    Here are last years final numbers.

    USL-1/A-League

    Code:
    Final Numbers
    Year    Average    Median    %<2K    %>10k
    2002    3037    2185    40.1%    3.6%
    2003    3335    2463    42.9%    4.1%
    2004    3878    3107    30.9%    4.5%
    2005    4527    3554    19.6%    7.7%
    2006    4666    3370    18.5%    10.7%
    2007    4771    4274    19.6%    10.1%
    2008    5164    4510    10.9%    12.1%
    2009    4709    3662    21.2%    13.3%
    Code:
    USL1			 Total	Team Avg	Playoffs
    Montreal Impact		180494	12033		11282, 9835
    Portland Timbers	146008	 9734		14283
    Rochester Rhinos	 96425	 6428		n/a
    Vancouver Whitecaps	 79678	 5312		5135, 4516, 5886
    Charleston Battery	 53013	 3534		n/a
    Puerto Rico Islanders	 49391	 3293		4232, 5101
    Minnesota Thunder	 48135	 3209
    Austin Aztex		 44611	 2974
    Carolina RailHawks	 40953	 2730		2471
    Cleveland City Stars	 22362	 1491
    Miami FC Blues		 15952	 1063
    USL-2/D3 Pro League

    Code:
    Final Numbers
    Year    Average    Median    %<1K    %>3k
    2005    1680    1457    21.4%    11.9%
    2006    1803    1703    14.1%    11.8%
    2007    1575    1423    28.1%    6.3%
    2008    1614    1629    26.0%    7.3%
    2009    1602    1518    31.8%    7.1%
    Code:
    USL2				Total	Team Avg	Playoffs
    Richmond Kickers   		28737	2874		1923, 2991
    Wilmington Hammerheads		24666	2467		2783
    Western Mass Pioneers   	17130	1903
    Harrisburg City Islanders   	18571	1857
    Charlotte Eagles     		12420	1242		 760
    Crystal Palace Baltimore   	11807	1181
    Pittsburgh Riverhounds   	11778	1178
    Bermuda Hogges   		 7440	 744
    Real Maryland Monarchs		 3649	 608
     
  2. The Marquis

    The Marquis Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 13, 2007
    Washougal, WA
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I feel like a broke the board. Hmm, apparently I need some more learnin'

    Here is the season up through this most recent weekend.

    Final Numbers for historical data, 2.4% played in 2010

    Code:
    Year    Average    Median    %<2K    %>10k
    2002    3037    2185    40.1%    3.6%
    2003    3335    2463    42.9%    4.1%
    2004    3878    3107    30.9%    4.5%
    2005    4527    3554    19.6%    7.7%
    2006    4666    3370    18.5%    10.7%
    2007    4771    4274    19.6%    10.1%
    2008    5164    4510    10.9%    12.1%
    2009    4709    3662    21.2%    13.3%
    2010    2706    2328    25.0%    0.0%
    
    Code:
    USSF Div. 1        Total    Team Avg    
    Montreal Impact        0    0        
    Portland Timbers    0    0        
    Rochester Rhinos    0    0    
    Vancouver Whitecaps    4934    4934        
    Puerto Rico Islanders    0    0    
    NSC Minnesota         0    0
    Austin Aztex        2642    2642
    Carolina RailHawks    2013    2013    
    C.P. Baltimore        0    0
    Miami FC Blues        1235    1235
    AC St. Louis        0    0
    Tampa Bay Rowdies    0    0
    
    dang... more learnin' I'll have this figured out by seasons end.
     
  3. athletics68

    athletics68 Member+

    Dec 12, 2006
    San Diego & San Jose
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So if I'm reading this correctly, Carolina and YVR so far are below their averages, Miami is above their average, and Austin is about average?
     
  4. Alejo

    Alejo Member

    Jul 17, 2008
    Austin, Texas, Yall
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I thought our man, Violet Crown, helped you out with this stuff in the past Marquis?? Anyway good to see we have this thread goin for 2010, and let us not forget that none of "The big three of D2 Attendance" (Montreal/Rochester/and your own PTFC) have played a home game yet between them.
     
  5. The Marquis

    The Marquis Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 13, 2007
    Washougal, WA
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Hahaha, VioletCrown did it all before, I'm just taking over because he's not interested this year, and I'm beginning to understand why pretty quickly.

    Vancouver is about average, Austin is about average, Carolina and Miami are below.
     
  6. jasontoon

    jasontoon Member

    Jan 9, 2002
    Seattle, WA
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    With a stadium that holds only 6200, AC St. Louis probably won't move the needle much on the league-wide average. But I think hitting last year's league average - 4709 - is eminently doable for AC.
     
  7. ceezmad

    ceezmad Member+

    Mar 4, 2010
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Red Stars
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    2008 was a good year!
     
  8. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Minor quibble: you might want to change the USL-1/A-League to USSF D2/USL-1/A-League.

    Though that's getting a bit ridiculous, and if USL1 doesn't make and NASL does next year, then, oy, vey.

    Maybe just make it US Second Division*?

    Anyway, thanks much for picking up my slack.

    It will be interesting to see where things end up this season. Having dropped a poor attendance team in Cleveland, but replaced it with an even poorer drawing Baltimore, plus two new ones in St. Louis and Tampa attendance should go up.

    I wouldn't be surprised to see Austin go down a little -- sophomore slump. Heard that Tampa sold 1K season tickets. I think the odds are pretty good that both of them will draw better than last year's league average. Minnesota, despite being a new name, I expect will do pretty much the same as last year. It's a very familiar brand up there, and very hooked into the soccer community.

    Overall, I doubt we'll hit 2008 numbers. But should definitely do better than last year.
     
  9. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Vancouver is below anything they got last year, but if you look back over a longer time frame, it's right on par with what they usually do. In '08 (that really good year for the USL1), about half their games were below 5k, all of them in that upper 4k range.

    More importantly -- it was just one game. With the confusing off-season, most offices had a hard time preparing and selling season tickets.
     
  10. Mikey mouse

    Mikey mouse Member

    Jul 27, 1999
    Charleston, SC
    Club:
    Charleston
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  11. brentgoulet

    brentgoulet Member+

    Oct 12, 2005
    PuertoPlata, DomRep
  12. KyleScarborough

    KyleScarborough New Member

    Dec 3, 2009
    Washington, MO
    Club:
    St. Louis Lions
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Those numbers are pretty bad.

    I'm not jumping to conclussions or delusional enough to think it won't go down in St. Louis here after the hype of the opener, but we're apparently sold out today, or right at it.

    That's almost 6,200.
     
  13. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The number announced at the stadium (overheard on the webcast) was something like 5600. Pretty good.

    However, I really do wonder why Baltimore was so hot to move up. And why the NASL thinks they're a good organization to have.

    Portland will at least mask all that.
     
  14. njndirish

    njndirish Member

    Jul 14, 2008
    Notre Dame, IN
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    All I heard is that Porland sold out
     
  15. Mikey mouse

    Mikey mouse Member

    Jul 27, 1999
    Charleston, SC
    Club:
    Charleston
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  16. Howard the Drake

    Feb 27, 2010

    15,148
     
  17. Mikey mouse

    Mikey mouse Member

    Jul 27, 1999
    Charleston, SC
    Club:
    Charleston
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  18. DemonJuice

    DemonJuice Member

    Portland Timbers
    United States
    Aug 21, 2007
    Portland, OR
    Club:
    Portland Timbers
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Fixed
     
  19. brentgoulet

    brentgoulet Member+

    Oct 12, 2005
    PuertoPlata, DomRep
    Move Portland to MLS !
     
  20. CCSUltra

    CCSUltra Member+

    Nov 18, 2008
    Cleveland
    Club:
    Hertha BSC Berlin
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Because they have a lot of money. Baltimore wanted to move up to USL1 the same year Cleveland did.
     
  21. MLSTIM

    MLSTIM Member

    Mar 21, 2009
    Saint Charles
    Club:
    Norwich City FC
    I think the scary thing is that there wasn't much hype at all other then via the hardcore fans. There was barely any mention of the team in the paper or on the radio the past few months. Most of their marketing is done via Facebook and Twitter. It's amazing to think what could happen if AC St. Louis really marketed the team. I talked to a few people in the past week that follow soccer, not hardcore by any means and had no idea that we even had a team.

    Tim
     
  22. brentgoulet

    brentgoulet Member+

    Oct 12, 2005
    PuertoPlata, DomRep
    Good you mention all that. Yes, in these modern times Facebook and Twitter can do a lot of marketing
     
  23. VioletCrown

    VioletCrown Member+

    FC Dallas
    United States
    Aug 30, 2000
    Austin, Texas
    Club:
    Austin Aztex
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I don't follow the English leagues that closely. Didn't the parent club have some financial issues? So the plan for CP Baltimore is to follow in the parent club's footsteps, and blow all the money they have?

    Doesn't seem like a good plan to me. Here's hoping they start drawing better. Because if I were a Baltimore politician, I'd wonder if it was such a good idea to build them a stadium.
     
  24. KyleScarborough

    KyleScarborough New Member

    Dec 3, 2009
    Washington, MO
    Club:
    St. Louis Lions
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Seems to be the broken record story you hear: "No one even knows we have a team".

    A simple story on all the local sports channels would do wonders, I'd think. At least people would simply know of it.

    All that said, when a friend of mine told a co-worker who was a former player himself, he simply didn't remember the opening date, but he can bring upwards of 20 people alone who'd love to see it. So, word of mouth is important. Just keep promoting it and it'll get out there.

    Plus I'll be a season ticket holder for life.
     
  25. CCSUltra

    CCSUltra Member+

    Nov 18, 2008
    Cleveland
    Club:
    Hertha BSC Berlin
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yeah, you can say put it on the local sports channels all you want, but if they channels don't want to cover the team and don't care about the team, that ain't much you can do.

    @Violet, Palace UK did have problems, but CPB is a separate entity. They aren't too reliant on the parent team.
     

Share This Page